Commit Graph
24 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
not d74270b0bd docs+test(e2e): ADR-0026, S-15b demo note, default-fill e2e (refs #131)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m49s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 3m44s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 15m53s
2026-07-24 15:45:18 +02:00
not 4698c869f3 feat(portal-beheer): beheer portal + read-only catalogus viewer (closes #130) (#133)
CI / build (push) Successful in 4m31s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4m48s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m50s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 4m44s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 7m12s
CI / verify-stack (push) Canceled after 0s
## What & why

S-15a, the first of the S-15 (#16) split. A new **beheer** portal (medewerker realm, like behandel) shows the ZTC catalogus — the published zaaktypen — **read-only**. A beheerder logs in and sees the seeded BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype.

Closes #130

### The vertical

portal → BFF `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` → ZGW Catalogi API.

- **ACL**: new read-only `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` listing published zaaktypen (reuses the ADR-0021 Catalogi client; public-safe `identificatie`/`omschrijving`).
- **BFF**: new typed `IAclClient` + `Downstream:Acl:BaseUrl`, and `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` behind a new `beheerder` policy (reuses the medewerker bearer scheme + realm-role lifting). OpenAPI spec + generated Angular client regenerated.
- **Keycloak**: `beheerder` realm role + `bram-beheerder` test user in the medewerker realm.
- **Frontend**: new `apps/beheer` Angular app (copied from behandel) with a read-only catalogus page; `SECURE_API_ROUTES=['/beheer/']`.
- **Infra**: `beheer` compose service (port 8143), added to `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log-dump; a Playwright e2e (beheerder login → catalogus shows BIG-REGISTRATIE).

### New boundary → ADR-0025

The BFF now reaches the **ACL directly** for the catalogus read — a new service-to-service edge (§14). The catalogus is neither a domain nor a projection concern, and §8.1 means only the ACL may read ZGW; routing through the domain would pollute it with a non-domain passthrough. §8.1/§8.3 stay intact. Recorded in **ADR-0025**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer: ACL, BFF, frontend).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing #130.
- [ ] CI green — pending Gitea Actions run.
- [x] `docker compose up` brings up `beheer` (health-gated in `WAIT_SVCS`).
- [x] Docs — ADR-0025 + demo-script S-15a note.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Verified locally

lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit (Acl 57 / Big 152 / EventSubscriber 19 / Bff 40) ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · frontend build (4 apps) ✓. Mutation ratchet: added a gateway unit test for the new `ListZaaktypenAsync` mapping so the ACL score holds. verify-stack (compose smoke + e2e) runs in CI.

## Notes for reviewers

- The BFF drops the ZGW URL from `BeheerZaaktype` (public-safe: identificatie + omschrijving only).
- The catalogus e2e asserts on the stable seeded `BIG-REGISTRATIE` (not a per-test reference), safe on the shared verify stack.
- Follow-ups: **S-15b** (#131) default-fill CRUD, **S-15c** (#132) medewerker-realm MFA.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #133
2026-07-24 11:08:17 +00:00
not d5dfbdc0b2 feat(obs): Prometheus metrics on /metrics + golden-signal Grafana dashboard (closes #124) (#129)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m47s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m59s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m57s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m58s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m57s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m29s
## What & why

S-16c, the last of the S-16 (#17) split, on top of the backplane (#122) and distributed tracing (#123). The five .NET services now expose OpenTelemetry **metrics** in Prometheus format at `/metrics`; Prometheus scrapes each (one job per service); and Grafana ships a pre-built **Request path — golden signals** dashboard (traffic / errors / latency / saturation), split by service.

Closes #124

### How

- Each service adds `.WithMetrics(AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation + AddHttpClientInstrumentation + AddMeter("System.Runtime") + AddPrometheusExporter)` and maps `/metrics`. Same shape as the S-16b tracing wiring already in these `Program.cs` files.
- `infra/observability/prometheus/prometheus.yml`: one scrape job per service (`acl`, `domain`, `bff`, `event-subscriber`, `projection-api`), reached by compose service name.
- `infra/observability/grafana/provisioning/dashboards/`: dashboard provider + `golden-signals.json` (baked into the Grafana image by the existing `COPY provisioning/`).
- `verify-metrics` (new CI verify-stack step + Makefile target): generates BFF traffic and asserts Prometheus scraped the golden-signal metric from every service. Mirrors `verify-tracing`.

### Dependency (CLAUDE.md §13/§14)

Adds `OpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus.AspNetCore` `1.17.0-beta.1` (matched to the `1.17.0` core already in use). It gives the OTel-native `/metrics` pull endpoint; replacing it would mean hand-rolling Prometheus exposition over a `MeterListener`; the risk is that it is a **prerelease** package (the whole OTel .NET Prometheus line is `-beta`) — pinned, wired only in `Program.cs`, and gated by `verify-metrics`. Recorded in **ADR-0024**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#124).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (`test(bff): /metrics exposes http-server request duration`).
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [ ] CI green — pending Gitea Actions run.
- [x] `docker compose up` reaches green health within 3 min (backplane images unchanged in shape; not on the health gate, ADR-0023).
- [x] Docs updated — demo-script S-16c entry.
- [x] ADR added — ADR-0024.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- `/health` polls are counted as traffic (metrics aren't path-filtered, unlike traces). Fine for a demo dashboard and honest — real load stacks on top.
- `projection-api` has no Stryker config (unchanged); the four mutated services carry the metrics wiring in `Program.cs`, same as the merged S-16b tracing code.
- Metric names verified against a live service: `http_server_request_duration_seconds{,_bucket,_count}`, label `http_response_status_code`, `dotnet_process_cpu_time_seconds_total`.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Reviewed-on: #129
2026-07-24 08:31:41 +00:00
not 88338396f6 feat(obs): distributed traces across the .NET services (S-16b, closes #123) (#126)
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 12m13s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m50s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m58s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 2m8s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 4m29s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 11m51s
## What & why

S-16b, second of the S-16 split, on top of the #125 backplane. The five .NET services now emit OpenTelemetry traces so a request is **one connected trace** across them.

- Each host wires `AddOpenTelemetry().WithTracing(...)` with `AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation` (incoming) + `AddHttpClientInstrumentation` (outgoing) + `AddOtlpExporter` to **Tempo**.
- Because every cross-service call already goes through a typed `HttpClient` (§8 boundaries), the W3C `traceparent` propagates with no manual code — bff → domain → acl → openzaak and bff → projection-api stitch into a single trace.
- Service name + OTLP endpoint come from `OTEL_*` env set per app service in compose. `/health` is filtered out so liveness polls don't flood the traces.

No new ADR — ADR-0023 already records the stack + the two documented gaps (browser-side tracing is out of scope, so the trace begins at the BFF; the async Flowable-poll boundary is a separate trace).

Closes #123

## Definition of Done

- [x] Failing test committed first (`verify-tracing` fails with no instrumentation).
- [x] Implementation makes it pass — **validated locally end to end**: a real connected trace spanning `bff` + `projection-api` was found in Tempo (BFF→projection→db + Tempo subset, no OpenZaak/egress).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #123`).
- [ ] CI green — awaiting Gitea Actions (verify-tracing added to verify-stack after verify-bff).
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected — services boot healthy even when Tempo is unreachable (exporter no-ops; verified).
- [x] Docs — demo-script + BACKLOG.
- [x] ADR — none needed (covered by ADR-0023).

## Notes for reviewers

- **Per-service wiring, no shared lib:** the block is duplicated across the five hosts by design — services don't share code across boundaries here (§8), same as the duplicated typed clients.
- **Packages:** OpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting / Instrumentation.AspNetCore / Instrumentation.Http / Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol, all 1.17.0, pinned per-csproj (no central props file).
- **The check** generates anonymous BFF→projection traffic (no auth, no OpenZaak), then queries Tempo (TraceQL search → fetch trace → assert both service.names present) from a python:3-slim container in-network — same idiom as run-projection-check.sh.
- **Next:** #124 (S-16c) adds `/metrics` + Prometheus scrape targets + golden-signal Grafana dashboards.

Reviewed-on: #126
2026-07-23 14:38:26 +00:00
not 4274fd30d1 feat(infra): observability backplane — Tempo + Prometheus + Grafana (S-16a, closes #122) (#125)
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m22s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 11m53s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m24s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m54s
## What & why

S-16a, the first of the **S-16 split** (#17 closed → #122/#123/#124, §13). Stands up a local, CI-friendly observability backplane so traces (S-16b) and metrics (S-16c) have somewhere to land, viewable in one Grafana.

- **Grafana Tempo** — OTLP trace ingest (gRPC 4317 / HTTP 4318), local storage.
- **Prometheus** — scrapes itself for now; service `/metrics` targets arrive in S-16c.
- **Grafana** — Tempo + Prometheus datasources auto-provisioned with fixed uids (`tempo`, `prometheus`), exposed on :3000.

All three are small **built images** with config baked in (`infra/observability/`), on the existing `cg` network. **No OTLP collector** (Tempo ingests OTLP directly; Prometheus scrapes) and **no config-volume seeding** — the tools aren't verbatim CG peer modules, so a 3-line `COPY` Dockerfile is the simpler path that still reaches sibling containers on the CI runner (**ADR-0023**).

### Verified, not assumed

`make verify-observability` (new CI `verify-stack` step, run early) asks Grafana to reach both datasources — Prometheus via its health method, Tempo via the datasource proxy (Tempo's plugin implements no health method) — so it proves the datasources are wired, not merely that containers booted. Validated locally against the three containers (no external egress): Grafana healthy, both datasources reachable.

Closes #122

## Definition of Done

- [x] Failing test committed first (`verify-observability` fails with no backplane).
- [x] Implementation makes it pass; verified locally.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #122`).
- [ ] CI green — awaiting Gitea Actions (verify-stack now includes the observability step; `docker compose config` validates locally).
- [ ] `docker compose up` reaches green health within 3 min — new containers are lightweight and off the health-gate list.
- [x] Docs — ADR-0023, demo-script, BACKLOG sync.
- [x] ADR added — `docs/architecture/adr-0023-observability-stack.md`.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **No app changes** — this is pure infra; the five services are untouched (instrumentation is #123/#124).
- **Ports:** Grafana 3000 (admin/admin, anonymous viewer on), Prometheus 9090; Tempo internal to `cg`.
- **CI:** the three containers are added to the failure log-dump list; deliberately **not** added to `WAIT_SVCS` (the check polls Grafana itself, so no in-image healthcheck tool is needed). Trades ~3 small image builds per run.
- **Next:** #123 wires OTLP export + `AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation`/`AddHttpClientInstrumentation` into the five hosts so a request becomes one connected trace in Tempo.

Reviewed-on: #125
2026-07-23 12:26:22 +00:00
not 4fe9915816 feat(domain): herregistratie reminder sweep on a Quartz cron (S-17, closes #18) (#121)
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m14s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m20s
CI / build (push) Successful in 59s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m16s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m38s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m53s
## What & why

S-17: a BIG inscription is valid for a fixed term; before it lapses the zorgprofessional must herregistreren. This adds a **daily herregistratie reminder sweep**.

- **Domain:** `Approve(ingeschrevenOp)` now stamps the inscription moment; `HerregistratieVoor` derives the deadline (inscription + 5-year validity); `HerregistratieReminderDue(asOf)` is the single rule (inside the 90-day window, inscribed, not yet reminded); `MarkHerregistratieReminderVerstuurd()` is idempotent.
- **Store:** `FindDueForHerregistratieReminderAsync(asOf)` — the sweep's candidate set, filtered on the aggregate's own rule (no duplicated policy).
- **Application:** `HerregistratieReminderSweep` — pure over the store + an injected `TimeProvider`; flags + persists each due inscription, returns the reminded ids.
- **Infra/API:** `HerregistratieReminderJob` (Quartz `IJob`) fires the sweep on a daily cron (03:00, overridable via `Quartz__Cron`) and logs the count. `GET /registrations/{id}` surfaces `herregistratieVoor` + `herregistratieReminderVerstuurd`.

**Decisions (both raised with you before coding):** use Quartz.NET as the PRD names it — a genuine cron concern, distinct from the queue-draining pumps, which stay as-is (**ADR-0022**, proposal #120); and the reminder's observable effect is a flag on the aggregate + a log line (no outbound notification infra in v1). No coupling rule (§8) is touched — Quartz is internal to the Domain Service.

Closes #18
Closes #120

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green per layer: domain rule, store query, sweep).
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit for the 90-day knob.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #18`).
- [ ] CI green — awaiting Gitea Actions.
- [ ] `docker compose up` reaches green health checks within 3 minutes — API boots locally with Quartz initialised; verified in CI compose smoke.
- [x] Docs updated — ADR-0022, demo-script, BACKLOG.
- [x] ADR added — `docs/architecture/adr-0022-quartz-scheduler.md`.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **Ripple:** `Approve()` gained the inscription moment, so the two approving handlers (`ApproveRegistration`, `BeoordeelRegistratie`) now take an injected `TimeProvider`; existing tests pass a fixed clock. All three `IRegistrationStore` implementers (prod, unit fake, acceptance) got the new query.
- **Calibration knobs:** validity (5y) and reminder lead time (90d) are domain constants marked with `ponytail:` comments; promotion path to beheer config (S-15) noted in the ADR.
- **Mutation:** the Quartz job shell is excluded from Stryker, mirroring the pumps; all rule/sweep/query logic is covered.
- Local: 152 domain unit tests green; API boots with the Quartz scheduler and `/health` green.

Reviewed-on: #121
2026-07-23 10:31:56 +00:00
not 5de8c1e292 feat(acl): resolve the zaaktype by identificatie, not a pinned URL (S-27, closes #113) (#118)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m21s
CI / build (push) Successful in 58s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m36s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m36s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m4s
## What & why

The ACL was handed a **pinned zaaktype URL** (`Acl__Defaults__ZaaktypeUrl`) + informatieobjecttype URL. OpenZaak assigns those UUIDs at creation, so every stack had to seed the catalogus and then capture + inject the resulting URLs out of band (CI's `run-domain-check.sh`; the local `local-seed`→`acl.env` bootstrap from ADR-0020). Brittle, and a stale/placeholder URL failed opaquely (OpenZaak 400).

Now **the ACL resolves them itself** from OpenZaak's Catalogi API by stable business key:
- config `ZaaktypeIdentificatie` (`BIG-REGISTRATIE`) / `InformatieobjecttypeOmschrijving` (`Diploma`);
- a `CachedZaaktypeCatalog` resolves **lazily on first use** and caches (success only, so a pre-publish miss is retried — no startup ordering coupling);
- a clear "No published … found" error replaces the opaque placeholder 400.

Design in **ADR-0021** (proposed in #117).

Closes #113
Closes #117

## Consequences (the payoff)

No stack captures/injects a server-assigned URL any more — `docker-compose.yml`/`.local.yml`, `run-domain-check.sh` and `local-seed` all drop it; the local `acl.env` shrinks to a single line.

**One thing S-27 can't remove** (confirmed empirically during this work): OpenZaak validates the `zaaktype` field on zaak-create with Django's URLValidator and **rejects a single-label host** (`http://openzaak:8000/…` → `zaaktype: bad-url`). So the ACL's **base URL** must still point at a URL-valid host (a container IP); that base-URL injection from ADR-0020 stays (local `acl.env` now carries only it; CI keeps `ACL_OPENZAAK_BASEURL`). ADR-0021 records this.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issues (#113 slice, #117 adr-proposal).
- [x] TDD — resolver + gateway-lookup unit tests, updated `AclService` tests (50 unit tests green).
- [x] Implementation makes them pass; refactor of both compose stacks + verify scripts follows.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing #113.
- [ ] CI green — see below.
- [x] `docker compose up` reaches green health — verified: fresh `make local` + `make verify-local` green with **no zaaktype-URL injection**; `acl.env` is base-URL-only.
- [x] Docs — ADR-0021 + demo-script S-27 note.
- [x] ADR added (ADR-0021).
- [x] Demo note appended.

## Verification done locally

- **50 unit tests** pass (resolver resolve/cache/retry-on-failure; gateway match/miss/blank-key; all `AclService` paths).
- **6 ACL integration tests** pass against a live seeded OpenZaak — incl. resolving the zaaktype + Diploma iot by business key, and a clear error for an unknown identificatie.
- **Fresh `make local` + `make verify-local`**: full flow (submit → werkbak → openbaar) green; `acl.env` = `Acl__OpenZaak__BaseUrl` only.
- `make lint` clean; ACL mutation ratchet run locally (see checks).

## Notes for reviewers

- `IZaakGateway` gains two resolve methods; `AclService` depends on the new `IZaaktypeCatalog` (singleton, so the cache persists).
- Supersedes the pinned-URL mechanism; ADR-0021 documents that ADR-0020's `seed-env`/entrypoint shim are **simplified** (base-URL only), not deleted, because of the URLValidator constraint above.

Reviewed-on: #118
2026-07-22 14:49:25 +00:00
not 183d0bce31 fix(infra): docker-compose.local self-seeds zaaktype, DMN + NRC abonnement (closes #110) (#114)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m20s
CI / build (push) Successful in 59s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m42s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m42s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m21s
## What & why

The host-browser stack (`make local`) had drifted behind three slices, so a fresh bring-up couldn't complete the flow: registrations stuck at `OpenZaakAanmaken`, the behandel werkbak stayed empty, and the openbaar register showed nothing. The `verify-*` scripts do this setup for CI at test time; `make local` had no equivalent.

This makes the local stack **self-seed at bring-up** so it just works in a browser:

- **DMN** — `flowable-init` now also deploys `diploma-eligibility.dmn` (was BPMN-only), so completing `WachtOpDocumenten` routes through the DMN to `Beoordelen` instead of 404ing.
- **Zaaktype + ACL** — a `local-seed` one-shot publishes the BIG zaaktype (whose UUID is server-assigned, hence not static in the compose file) and writes the real URLs to `seed-env:/acl.env`; the ACL sources it on startup via an entrypoint override.
- **NRC abonnement** — an `nrc-subscribe` one-shot registers the `zaken` subscription at the event-subscriber callback, so notifications reach the projection/openbaar register.

Both one-shots reach OpenZaak/NRC by **container IP** (a single-label host fails their Django URLValidator), mirroring the CI verify scripts. Design + trade-offs in **ADR-0020**.

Closes #110

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#110).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation — `test(infra): …` adds `infra/run-local-flow-check.sh` / `make verify-local`; the three gaps' failures were observed live on a fresh `make local` (red), and the fix turns it green.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; docs commit follows.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #110`).
- [ ] CI green — running on the restored runner. Infra-only change; the CI `verify-stack` job uses `docker-compose.yml` (untouched). Also validated locally: `make verify-local` passes against a fresh `make local` (see below).
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks — verified: `make local` healthy in ~2m20s, then `make verify-local` green.
- [x] Docs updated — ADR-0020 + demo-script note.
- [x] ADR added in `docs/architecture/` — ADR-0020.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **Infra-only** — no service code changes; the ACL image and the CI stack (`docker-compose.yml`) are untouched.
- **Verified end-to-end on a fresh stack** (`make local-down && make local && make verify-local`):
  ```
  >> 2. zaak opened            (zaaktype seeded + wired)
  >> 3. documents accepted 204 (DMN deployed)
  >> 4. in the werkbak         (DMN routing → Beoordelen)
  >> 5. visible in the openbaar register (NRC abonnement)
  OK — a fresh local stack completed the flow with no manual seeding
  ```
- **Follow-up:** the cleaner design — ACL resolving its zaaktype by `identificatie` instead of a pinned server-assigned URL — is split out as **S-27 (#113)**; landing it would remove the `acl.env` injection here. ADR-0020 records this.
- The `seed-env` volume carries the generated `acl.env` from `local-seed` to the ACL; a `down --volumes` (as `make local-down` does) resets it cleanly.

Reviewed-on: #114
2026-07-22 12:44:29 +00:00
not c8fdfbb699 feat(acl,domain): cancel the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (S-10c, closes #106) (#109)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m34s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m0s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m17s
## S-10c · Close the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (closes #106)

Completes the S-10a/S-10b boundary flagged in ADR-0017: when a registration's 30-day document term lapses, the domain now cancels the **ZGW zaak** as well as marking the aggregate `Verlopen`, so OpenZaak and the register no longer diverge.

### What it does
On expiry the `ExpireRegistrationWorker` calls the ACL to set the zaak to a distinct, non-terminal **`Geannuleerd`** status with a **`Vervallen`** resultaat (vs the approval `Afgehandeld` + `Geregistreerd`), resolved **by omschrijving** in the ACL — the ACL-first ordering mirrors approval so a failed ZGW call leaves the job for redelivery rather than diverging the two.

**Path:** Flowable P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job → domain `ExpireRegistrationWorker` → ACL `POST /annuleringen` → ZGW `resultaten` + `statussen` (Geannuleerd) → aggregate `Verlopen`.

### Layers touched (each red→green)
- **ACL gateway** — `SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync` (Geannuleerd + Vervallen by name); approval now resolves its `Geregistreerd` resultaat by name too (a second resultaattype now exists).
- **ACL service/API** — `AclService.CancelZaakAsync` + `POST /annuleringen`.
- **Domain** — `IAclClient.CancelZaakAsync` + client; expiry worker cancels the zaak before advancing to `Verlopen`, guarded against redelivery double-cancel.
- **Seed** — non-terminal `Geannuleerd` statustype (volgnummer 2; `Afgehandeld` → 3) + `Vervallen` resultaattype, both idempotent by omschrijving and sharing the zaaktype's procestype.
- **Verify/integration** — ACL↔OpenZaak integration test (live `Geannuleerd` + resultaat); `run-domain-check.sh` fires the real P30D timer and asserts the zaak reaches `Geannuleerd` end-to-end; BDD scenario asserts cancel-on-timeout vs untouched-when-in-time.
- **Docs** — ADR-0019 (cancellation modelling decision), demo-script, BACKLOG.

### Design note (ADR-0019)
ZGW allows only one eindstatus per zaaktype, so `Geannuleerd` is modelled as a **non-terminal** status (it records a cancellation status + resultaat but does not set `einddatum`). This follows the issue's explicit "distinct statustype + resultaat" outcome; the shared-eindstatus alternative is recorded in the ADR.

### Tests
Unit + acceptance all green locally (Acl 38, Big 134, Acceptance 17, Bff 33, EventSubscriber 19). Integration + verify-stack run in CI (need live OpenZaak + selectielijst egress).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Reviewed-on: #109
2026-07-21 13:58:15 +00:00
not 0904df8db0 feat(acl): diploma upload stored in the ZGW Documenten API (S-10b, closes #103) (#108)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m21s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m40s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m31s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m56s
## What & why

S-10b: the self-service **diploma upload** is now real. After submitting, the citizen picks a PDF and
uploads it; the portal base64-encodes it client-side → BFF → domain → **ACL**, which stores it in the
ZGW **Documenten (DRC) API** as an `enkelvoudiginformatieobject` and relates it to the zaak, then the
`WachtOpDocumenten` wait completes and the case advances to beoordeling. Per §8.1 only the ACL talks to
ZGW.

Closes #103

Mechanism in **ADR-0018** (proposal #107). Builds on S-10a (#102). The zaak-close-on-expiry item is
carved to **#106 (S-10c)**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green per layer).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #103`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR).
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (ACL boots on a placeholder informatieobjecttype URL; the real one is injected by verify-domain).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0018, demo-script, BACKLOG + S-10c).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0018-diploma-upload-via-acl-documenten.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **ACL** (`OpenZaakGateway.StoreDocumentAsync` + `AclService.StoreDiplomaAsync` + `POST /documenten`) reuses the existing gateway patterns (ZGW Bearer, buffered non-chunked body, **no CRS** — Documenten isn't geo). Unit-tested via the stub handler; an **integration test** stores a real document against live OpenZaak (verify-acl).
- **Transport:** base64 JSON on every hop (portal encodes client-side) — I deviated from proposal #107's multipart to keep one contract shape and avoid `IFormFile`/antiforgery/multipart-client plumbing; fine at diploma size (ADR-0018 §Alternatives).
- **Infra:** `seed_catalogus.py` seeds + publishes a "Diploma" `informatieobjecttype` and relates it to the zaaktype (while both concept); `verify-domain` injects its URL into the ACL. No new ZGW scopes (seed applicatie has `heeft_alle_autorisaties`).
- **e2e:** uploads a real PDF (`setInputFiles`) after the openbaar INGEDIEND row confirms the zaak is open (so storage doesn't race the OpenZaak worker).
- **Scope boundary:** the ZGW zaak is not set to a cancellation status on 30-day expiry — that's #106 (S-10c).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Reviewed-on: #108
2026-07-21 12:15:33 +00:00
not 4777ff2b1d feat(workflow): document-wait task + 30-day timeout cancellation (S-10a, closes #102) (#105)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m14s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m37s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m17s
## What & why

S-10a, the **workflow/timeout spine** of the (split) document-upload slice: the registratie process
now parks at a **`WachtOpDocumenten`** user task with an **interrupting `P30D` boundary timer**. When
the documents arrive the task completes and the process continues into the diploma routing (S-13) →
Beoordelen; if the 30 days lapse, the timer cancels the wait, runs a `RegistratieVerlopen`
external-worker task, and the domain expires the aggregate to a new terminal status **`Verlopen`**.
Backend only — the real upload trigger (portal → BFF → ACL → Documenten API) is S-10b (#103).

Closes #102

Mechanism recorded in **ADR-0017**; opened as proposal #104. Mirrors the S-14 escalation
(boundary-timer + external-worker) and S-11 withdrawal (interrupting cancel) patterns.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green pairs per layer).
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #102`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR).
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (no new services; deploy path unchanged).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0017, demo-script, BACKLOG split).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0017-document-wait-timeout-cancellation.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **Domain** (`Registration.Expire()` + `Verlopen`), **application** (`ExpireRegistrationWorker`),
  **infra** (`RegistratieVerlopenProcessor`/`Pump`, `IRegistratieVerlopenClient`, Flowable
  acquire/complete + `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync`) — the timeout counterpart to the OpenZaak/escalation
  worker trios; idempotent per §8.6.
- **BPMN** verified live against a `flowable-rest` probe: complete `WachtOpDocumenten` → routes to
  Beoordelen; fire the P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job (carrying `registrationId`) + the wait
  task cancelled. `verify-domain` exercises both branches in-stack (completes the wait in every existing
  block; fires the timer and asserts `Verlopen` in a new block).
- **Scope boundary:** on expiry the aggregate goes `Verlopen` and the process ends, but the ZGW *zaak*
  is not yet set to a cancellation status — that needs a new ACL method + statustype seeding and is
  folded into S-10b (noted in ADR-0017).
- `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync` is built and HTTP-tested here but not yet called from a domain endpoint;
  S-10b wires the upload trigger to it.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Reviewed-on: #105
2026-07-20 09:42:02 +00:00
not ccae27b3da feat(workflow): diploma-eligibility DMN routes foreign diplomas via CBGV-advies (S-13, closes #14) (#101)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m16s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 58s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m29s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m20s
## What & why

S-13: a diploma's origin decides its route. A **DMN** (`diploma-eligibility`) is evaluated inline by
the registratie process as a **`businessRuleTask`**; an exclusive gateway routes a **foreign**
(Buitenlands) diploma through a new **CBGVAdvies** user task before `Beoordelen`, a **domestic** one
straight there (PRD flow 4). The domain's only new job is carrying the diploma origin and passing it
as a process start variable.

Chose **Option B (DMN in the BPMN)** over the issue's literal "evaluated by the Domain Service via
Workflow Client" wording — keeps the decision a first-class workflow artefact and §8.2 clean.
Rationale in **ADR-0016** (proposal #100); noted on this issue.

Closes #14

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #14`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (additive; DMN deployed by flowable-init).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0016, demo note).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0016-diploma-eligibility-dmn.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## How it was built (TDD)

- **Domain**: `DiplomaOrigin` on the aggregate + submit command; threaded through the process-start port so the Workflow Client emits a `diplomaOrigin` start variable. Red → green.
- **DMN + BPMN**: `workflows/diploma-eligibility.dmn` (origin → route); `businessRuleTask` + exclusive gateway + `CBGVAdvies` user task in `registratie.bpmn`; DMN deployed to Flowable's DMN engine by `flowable-init`.
- **Both paths**: `Een diploma op herkomst routeren` acceptance scenarios (origin carried into the process) + unit tests; verify-domain drives a foreign registration through CBGVAdvies→Beoordelen and the domestic one straight to Beoordelen — exercising both DMN branches live.

## Notes for reviewers

- Deviation from the issue's Option-A wording is deliberate and recorded (ADR-0016); the outcome is unchanged.
- The self-service eIDAS→foreign wiring is out of scope here (this slice is area:domain + area:workflow); the domain submit accepts an optional `diplomaOrigin` so the foreign path is drivable.
- Local green: domain unit 109, acceptance 15, `dotnet format`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 95.39%** (break 90). The DMN/`businessRuleTask` REST wiring is CI-verified on verify-stack (no local full-stack run here).

Reviewed-on: #101
2026-07-20 07:26:52 +00:00
not 7bcbc726ce feat(workflow): beoordeling escalation to teamlead after 14 days (S-14, closes #15) (#99)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 56s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m11s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m30s
## What & why

S-14: a beoordeling a behandelaar does not pick up within **14 days** escalates to the **teamlead**.

A non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on the `Beoordelen` user task fires an external-worker task
(`BeoordelingEscaleren`); the domain's escalation worker reassigns the still-open task's candidate group
from `behandelaar` to `teamlead`. The task keeps its identity — only who may claim it changes. The
escalation-via-external-worker decision is recorded in **ADR-0015** (proposal #98); it upholds §8.2
(the Workflow Client stays the only code that talks to Flowable) and keeps Flowable a stock image.

Closes #15

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #NN`).
- [x] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (no new services; escalation is additive to the domain worker).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0015, demo note).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0015-beoordeling-escalation.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## How it was built (TDD)

- **Workflow Client** (`IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`): acquire `BeoordelingEscaleren` jobs → find the open `Beoordelen` task in the instance → add `teamlead`/remove `behandelaar` candidate group → complete the job. Red → green.
- **Escalation drain loop** (`BeoordelingEscalatieProcessor`) + hosted `BeoordelingEscalatiePump`, mirroring the OpenZaak worker. Red → green.
- **BPMN**: non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on `Beoordelen` → external task → escalation end.
- **Both branches** (escalate after timeout; no-op when completed in time) covered by the `Een beoordeling escaleren` acceptance scenarios + Workflow Client unit tests.
- **Live integration**: `verify-domain` fires the timer early via Flowable's management API and asserts the reassignment to teamlead.

## Notes for reviewers

- Interface segregation: escalation is on `IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`, separate from the OpenZaak worker's `IExternalWorkerClient`.
- Reassignment is two REST hops (add teamlead, remove behandelaar); idempotent on redelivery — see ADR-0015 consequences.
- Local checks green: domain unit tests (104), acceptance (13), `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 96.69%** (break 90). The `run-domain-check.sh` escalation path is CI-verified on verify-stack (local full-stack run is constrained here).
- `BeoordelingEscalatiePump` excluded from mutation, mirroring the existing `OpenZaakJobPump` exclusion.

Reviewed-on: #99
2026-07-17 09:45:36 +00:00
not 94699f3603 feat(self-service): trek aanvraag in — withdrawal action (S-11c-2, closes #12) (#93)
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m15s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m1s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m21s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m56s
## What & why

Final sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** — the user-facing "trek aanvraag in" action, which **closes #12**.

- **self-service portal**: the submit confirmation gains a **"Trek aanvraag in"** button. It withdraws the just-submitted registration via `postSelfServiceRegistrationsIdWithdraw(reference)`; success shows an *ingetrokken* confirmation, a failure is surfaced (`role="alert"`) and the action stays available — same confirm-and-surface pattern as submit.
- **acceptance**: `Een registratie intrekken` — owner withdraws → INGETROKKEN + workflow cancelled; a different bsn is reported not-found.
- **e2e**: `withdrawal.spec.ts` — DigiD submit → trek aanvraag in → the portal confirms ingetrokken.
- **docs**: demo-script + frontend-decisions.

Together with S-11a (#88), S-11b (#89), S-11c-1 (#90), this completes the flow: citizen withdraws → domain INGETROKKEN → BPMN message event cancels the process → the case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak.

Closes #12

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12).
- [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the tests pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` unaffected.
- [x] Docs updated (demo-script + frontend-decisions).
- [x] ADR — ADR-0014 (from S-11b) covers the cancellation decision; nothing new here.

## Notes for reviewers

- Full local gate run before pushing: `dotnet format --verify-no-changes` clean; `make unit` green (Acceptance **11** incl. the 2 new withdrawal scenarios, Big 95, BFF 30, Acl 27, EventSubscriber 19); self-service lint/test/build green (9 tests, incl. the 2 new withdraw tests).
- `withdrawal.spec.ts` waits on the *ingetrokken* confirmation (which only renders after the withdraw POST returns), so it can't cancel the request early (the 499 lesson from #87). Live-validated by verify-stack.

Reviewed-on: #93
2026-07-16 13:06:55 +00:00
not 3abf8f7ccf feat(behandel): behandel-portal — werkbak + beoordeling (closes #13) (#87)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m30s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 4m59s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m5s
## What & why

Finishes **S-12 · Behandel-portal — werkbak + beoordeling**. The backend sub-slices (S-12a/b/c-1/c-2) were merged, but the slice's stated outcome — a behandel *portal* with medewerker login, a werkbak, and decide — had no frontend. This adds it.

- **`libs/auth`**: `MedewerkerAuthService` + `provideMedewerkerAuth` (Keycloak `medewerker` realm), a `roles`/`hasRole` surface on the shared `AuthService`, and a realm-roles protocol mapper so the SPA can read `behandelaar`/`teamlead` from the token. The BFF remains the security boundary (ADR-0013).
- **`apps/behandel`**: a new Nx Angular app mirroring self-service — medewerker OIDC login and a **werkbak** page listing registrations awaiting beoordeling (`GET /behandel/werkbak`) with per-row **Goedkeuren/Afwijzen** actions (`POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide`) that refresh the list. NL DS/Utrecht, standalone + signals.
- **e2e**: the walking-skeleton happy path now approves through the real portal (behandelaar logs in, finds the row by reference, clicks Goedkeuren) instead of the temporary admin endpoint.
- **infra/docs**: behandel service in compose (`:8142`, depends on Keycloak); added to the smoke `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log dump; `frontend-decisions.md` and `demo-script.md` updated.

Closes #13

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #13`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes. *(behandel image + container verified locally; full stack gated in CI.)*
- [x] Docs updated if behaviour, contracts, or operations changed.
- [x] ADR added — ADR-0013 (merged with the backend sub-slices) already covers the wiring; no new decision here.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- Verified locally: auth + behandel + all frontend projects pass lint & unit tests (incl. axe WCAG 2.1 AA); production build green; the behandel Docker image builds and serves with the correct baked `medewerker` config + SPA fallback.
- The full compose-up smoke, e2e, and mutation are CI-gated (known local full-stack verify limits).
- **Follow-ups (not in scope):** the `WerkbakItem` contract has no citizen name (werkbak shows the BSN) — adding one is a BFF+domain contract change; and the domain's temporary admin `approve` endpoint is now unused by the e2e and could be removed.

Reviewed-on: #87
2026-07-16 08:31:57 +00:00
not 9997da8beb feat(#78): one citizen reference across self-service and the openbaar register (#79)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m33s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m54s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m34s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m39s
## What & why

Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**:

- **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`.
- **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log.
- **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference.

Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL.

Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #78
- [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7
- [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched)
- [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green)
- [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended
- [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose

closes #78

Reviewed-on: #79
2026-07-14 14:01:49 +00:00
not 1c185e6686 S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m6s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m34s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m35s
## What & why

S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.

## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)

- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.

## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)

- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).

## Verification

- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).

closes #75

Reviewed-on: #77
2026-07-14 09:04:57 +00:00
not bc9831c113 S-09: Openbaar Register portal — public lookup (#76)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / build (push) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 1m57s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m19s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 6m31s
Anonymous openbaar portal completing the walking skeleton (submit → projection → public visibility).

closes #10
2026-07-13 14:35:34 +00:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 d3f23a4da3 docs(portal-self-service): serving/e2e decisions + walking-skeleton demo note (refs #68)
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 14:09:04 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 29f3dcc6cf docs(portal-self-service): record NL DS + DigiD decisions and demo note (refs #67)
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 5m46s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 13:13:04 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 fd90c4abe2 docs(portal-self-service): frontend-decisions + demo note for S-08a (refs #65)
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m8s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / frontend (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Record the workspace/tooling decisions (pnpm, Nx scoped to apps/+libs/, Vitest,
no @nx/docker, no Nx Cloud, Gitea-only) and a demo note for running the placeholder
app. NL DS deferred to S-08c.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:58:02 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 96d447832f docs(bff): demo note for the BFF front door (S-07) (refs #8)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 58s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 5m56s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:15:39 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 67f0ffb88d docs(domain): demo note for submitting a registration (S-05) (refs #6)
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 58s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Failing after 17m2s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 6m2s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:32:29 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 0d0778036e docs(arch): ADR-0008 read projection store + demo note for the event path (refs #7)
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 2m16s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 5m34s
ADR-0008 records the read-projection design: one rebuildable store shared by the Event
Subscriber (writer) and projection-api (reader) as one CQRS bounded context (reconciled
with §8.5), idempotency + rebuild from the notification log (no OpenZaak access, §8.1),
the deferred bsn/naam, and the new EF Core + Npgsql dependency. Add a demo-script entry
walking the OZ→NRC→subscriber→projection-api path and wire both into the MkDocs nav.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 15:11:36 +02:00