not 1dd8bd4e1b
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m58s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 9m1s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m53s
S-24/#25 · Helm chart + Kubernetes deployment, and Caddy for the portals (#166) (#167)
## What & why

Two changes, made and verified together on a real cluster.

**S-24 / #25 — a Helm chart for the platform.** One chart, `infra/helm/big-reference`,
whose `values.yaml` is a near-literal transcription of `infra/docker-compose.yml`, rendered
by three generic templates (Deployment, Job, Service) over a `workloads` map. Adding a
service is a values edit. `make k8s-lint` renders and schema-checks the whole stack without
a cluster. The issue asked for a *sketch*; this is deployed and verified end to end (see
below), which is more than it asked for — the part it asked for that is **not** here is the
production-posture write-up (HA, secrets, backup), see Known gaps.

**#166 — Caddy replaces nginx in the portals.** nginx resolves a variable `proxy_pass`
upstream itself, using only the `resolver` directive and never `/etc/resolv.conf`'s search
domains. That had cost two workarounds in one script: rewriting the resolver address for
rootless podman, and injecting a full FQDN so the bare `bff` name could resolve on
Kubernetes. Caddy dials per request through the system resolver, so `reverse_proxy
bff:8080` works on every engine unchanged; `apps/portal-nginx-resolver.sh` and the chart's
`BFF_HOST` env are deleted.

Closes #25
Closes #166

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation — twice: the Caddyfile contract test
      before the Caddyfiles, `make k8s-lint` before the chart.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issues (`refs #25` / `refs #166`).
- [ ] CI green — awaiting the run on this PR (`make k8s-lint`, `dotnet format` and the new
      unit self-check pass locally; the compose e2e and mutation lanes are CI's).
- [ ] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes —
      the portal images were rebuilt and verified standalone, but a full `make up` run has
      not been done on this branch. Please confirm in review or let CI's smoke test speak.
- [x] Docs updated — `docs/runbooks/kubernetes-talos.md` (new), `frontend-decisions.md`,
      `demo-script.md`, and the docs that named nginx.
- [x] ADR added — ADR-0033 (chart) and ADR-0034 (Caddy).
- [ ] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md` — not added: the deployment target is not a
      user-visible slice, and the Caddy swap is invisible to the demo script beyond the
      wording fix included here.

## How it was verified

Brought up from scratch on a single-node Talos v1.14.0 VM (6 vCPU / 10 GB, virtio disk)
under virt-manager: **29 pods ready and four bootstrap Jobs complete in under three
minutes, zero restarts**, using ~4.4 GB of the VM's 10 GB.

- Full Common Ground path: portal Caddy → BFF → domain → Flowable → ACL → OpenZaak +
  Objecten → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → public register (`INGEDIEND`, reference
  matching the submitted registration).
- Werkbak read with an MFA'd medewerker token → 200.
- The browser flow driven with Playwright against `http://localhost:30140`: secure context,
  `crypto.subtle` present, Keycloak form reached, login completed, **no console errors**.
- Routing checked against a stub BFF: SPA fallback serves deep links, each portal proxies
  its own groups, and a portal does *not* proxy a neighbour's group.

## Notes for reviewers

Three bugs this shook out, each fixed at the cause rather than the symptom:

1. **`command` vs `args`.** Compose's `command:` replaces the image CMD; Kubernetes'
   replaces the ENTRYPOINT. Transcribing one to the other broke every upstream image that
   relies on its entrypoint — postgres refused to run as root, Keycloak tried to exec
   `start-dev`. The chart now `fail`s at render time on `command`.
2. **Concurrent migrations.** Both `/setup_configuration.sh` and `/start.sh` run
   `manage.py migrate`; compose serialises them with `depends_on`, Kubernetes has no such
   edge, so the init Job and its web pod raced (`relation "zgw_consumers_service" already
   exists`). The four Django services now do both steps in order in the web pod — which
   also deletes four workloads.
3. **`emptyDir` databases are wiped by any pod-template change.** `make k8s-reseed` now
   also restarts `event-subscriber` and `projection-api`, which create the projection
   schema on start and otherwise keep writing to a schema-less database.

Known gaps / follow-ups:

- **Secrets.** `values.yaml` carries the dev credentials in plain text (`admin/admin`, the
  ZGW client secret, the two Objecten tokens) and the chart has no `Secret` objects. Fine
  for a laptop demo, and exactly what #25's "production posture" ADR should address — I
  suggest a follow-up issue rather than stretching this PR.
- **No CI gate for the chart yet.** `make k8s-lint` exists but is not wired into
  `.gitea/workflows/ci.yaml`, and nothing enforces that the chart and the compose file stay
  in step. Worth a small follow-up.
- **This is two slices in one PR.** They were built and verified together and the diff is
  entangled (the chart was written against Caddy from the start), so splitting now would
  mean re-creating an nginx-shaped chart to throw away. Happy to split if you'd rather.
- **Rebased onto #161** (merged as #165) rather than merged, to keep the history linear.
  One conflict, in the `unit:` target where both branches add a self-check line — resolved
  by keeping both. #161's `infra/host-browser.yml` arrived with
  `/usr/share/nginx/html/config.json` and is fixed to `/usr/share/caddy/` inside the
  `feat(portals)` commit, so no commit on this branch leaves that overlay pointing at a
  path the images no longer have.Reviewed-on: #167
2026-09-10 08:53:58 +00:00
2026-07-14 14:46:55 +00:00
2026-06-03 11:38:28 +02:00

register-reference

A reference application demonstrating how to build a Dutch government register (a BIG-style professional register) on top of unforked Common Ground modules — OpenZaak, Open Notificaties, Objecten, Open Klant — with loose coupling, modern workflow tooling, and data-governance ready integration points.

This repository is the runnable companion to Respellion's Foundations playbook entry on Common Ground architecture for non-municipal contexts (CIBG, DUO, RVO, and similar uitvoeringsorganisaties).

Status: under active development. See BACKLOG.md for the current iteration.


Start here

Document Purpose
docs/PRD.md What we're building and why. Goals, non-goals, architecture summary, scope. Read once at project start.
CLAUDE.md How we work. Engineering principles, TDD/DDD/BDD discipline, non-negotiable architectural rules, Gitea conventions. Read every task.
BACKLOG.md Iteration plan. A curated mirror of the active Gitea milestone — Gitea Issues are the system of record.
docs/architecture/ Diagrams (Mermaid sources) and ADRs. Start with adr-0001-loose-coupling.md.
docs/runbooks/ Operational guides: local startup, seeding, common failures, CI debugging.

The day-to-day operational pages — environment URLs, known issues right now, on-call notes — live in the Gitea Wiki for this repository. The wiki points at docs/ for anything authoritative.


What this application demonstrates

  • A BIG-style professional register modelled on Dutch public-sector patterns, with four end-user portals: self-service, openbaar register, behandel-portal, beheer-portal.
  • Common Ground modules as upstream peers — never forked, reached only via documented APIs (ZGW, NRC events).
  • An Anti-Corruption Layer that confines all ZGW knowledge to one place, so the rest of the codebase stays domain-shaped rather than municipality-shaped.
  • BPMN + DMN workflows via Flowable as a separate, swappable module — using the external-task job-worker pattern so BPMN models never reach into OpenZaak.
  • A read projection as the public-facing data path, decoupled from the authoritative modules.
  • Synthetic data and mock identity (Keycloak realms standing in for DigiD, eHerkenning, eIDAS, and a medewerker IdP) so the whole system runs locally without external dependencies.
  • TDD, DDD, BDD, mutation testing, ADRs, and Conventional Commits as enforced defaults — encoded in CI.
  • Gitea-native delivery: source, issues, milestones, project boards, releases, container registry, packages, wiki, and Actions.

For the architecture rationale, see docs/PRD.md §3 and docs/architecture/.


Local quickstart

Prerequisites

  • .NET 10 SDK (for make lint/build/unit)
  • A container engine with Compose v2 — Docker, or rootless Podman (see docs/runbooks/ci.md for the Podman + Compose-provider setup)
  • make, curl, git
  • ~4 GB free RAM, ~5 GB free disk (grows as services land)

Clone

git clone git@git.labs.respellion.tech:eho/register-referentie.git
cd register-referentie

Wired today (Iteration 0): only the placeholder BFF exists so far. Get to green in under 10 minutes — run the full check gate, or just the running service:

make ci          # lint + build + unit + container smoke — the CI gate
docker compose -f infra/docker-compose.yml up -d --build --wait
curl http://localhost:8080/health     # -> Healthy

--wait exits non-zero unless the container reports healthy, so it doubles as the compose-up smoke test. The remaining services and the URLs below land in later slices.

Target service URLs (most land in later slices)

Service URL
Self-Service portal http://localhost:4200
Openbaar register http://localhost:4201
Behandel-portal http://localhost:4202
Beheer-portal http://localhost:4203
BFF http://localhost:8080
OpenZaak http://localhost:8000
Open Notificaties http://localhost:8001
Flowable http://localhost:8080
Keycloak http://localhost:8180
MkDocs site (after build) http://localhost:8000/docs/

Test credentials, BSNs, and personas: see docs/synthetic-data.md.

Build the docs site

python3 -m venv .venv && .venv/bin/pip install mkdocs-material
.venv/bin/mkdocs serve         # live preview at http://localhost:8000
.venv/bin/mkdocs build         # static site in ./site

Repository layout

register-reference/
├── apps/                       # Angular portals (Nx monorepo)
│   ├── self-service/
│   ├── openbaar/
│   ├── behandel/
│   └── beheer/
├── libs/                       # shared Angular libs (UI, auth, generated API client)
├── services/                   # .NET services
│   ├── bff/
│   ├── domain/                 # BIG Domain Service
│   ├── acl/                    # Anti-Corruption Layer (the only code that knows ZGW)
│   ├── event-subscriber/
│   └── projection-api/
├── workflows/                  # BPMN + DMN sources
├── infra/                      # docker-compose, Keycloak, OpenZaak, Flowable, seed
├── tests/
│   ├── acceptance/             # Gherkin / Reqnroll BDD scenarios
│   └── e2e/                    # Playwright
├── docs/                       # versioned documentation (MkDocs source)
├── .gitea/                     # Gitea Actions workflows, issue/PR templates
├── CLAUDE.md                   # working agreements
├── BACKLOG.md                  # iteration plan (mirror of active milestone)
└── README.md

Full description in docs/PRD.md §9.


Working in this repository

Source of truth for work: Gitea Issues + Milestones for this repository. BACKLOG.md is a mirror.

Branching: trunk-based. Short-lived branches off main, named <type>/<issue-number>-<short-slug> (e.g. feat/14-acl-default-fill).

Commits: Conventional Commits, referencing the Gitea issue:

feat(acl): default-fill bronorganisatie (refs #14)

The merging PR closes the issue via closes #14 in the squash-commit body.

Pull Requests: the unit of review. Squash-merged. PR template enforces the Definition of Done checklist from CLAUDE.md §3.

Releases: CalVer (YYYY.MM.PATCH), tagged on main, changelog generated by git-cliff, published as a Gitea Release with container images in the Gitea Container Registry.

See CLAUDE.md for the full working agreements, the architectural non-negotiables, and the rules Claude Code follows on every task.


Testing

  • Unit tests — dominant. .NET (xUnit) and Angular (Vitest / Testing Library).
  • Integration tests — Testcontainers-driven, exercising real OpenZaak, Flowable, NRC.
  • Acceptance tests — Gherkin scenarios in tests/acceptance/, one per user-visible flow.
  • End-to-end — Playwright, expanding slice by slice from the walking-skeleton happy path.
  • Mutation testing — Stryker.NET and Stryker, baseline-ratcheted on main.

Run everything:

./tools/test-all.sh

Run a focused slice (example):

dotnet test services/acl

Contributing

  1. Find or open a Gitea issue using one of the templates in .gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ (slice.md, bug.md, adr-proposal.md).
  2. Assign yourself, move it to "In progress" on the milestone's project board.
  3. Branch off main, follow the CLAUDE.md working agreements (TDD: red commit → green commit → refactor commit).
  4. Open a PR using the template, link the issue, ensure the Gitea Actions pipeline is green.
  5. Squash-merge once approved. The merging commit closes the issue.

If a task pushes against any of the architectural rules in CLAUDE.md §8, stop and open an adr-proposal issue first. That conversation is more important than the code.


License and attribution

Respellion-authored code is licensed under EUPL-1.2. Upstream Common Ground modules retain their own licences (typically EUPL-1.2 or MIT — see each module's repository).

This reference application is not an official product of CIBG, DUO, VNG Realisatie, or any government body. It is a Respellion playbook artefact illustrating an architectural pattern.


Contact

  • Issues, questions, proposals: open a Gitea issue on this repository.
  • Architectural discussion: start with an adr-proposal issue.
  • Anything sensitive: contact Respellion through the channel in docs/runbooks/contact.md.
S
Description
No description provided
Readme
1.8 MiB
2026.07.0
Latest
2026-07-14 14:47:22 +00:00
Languages
C# 60.8%
TypeScript 14.3%
Python 8.5%
Shell 8.3%
Makefile 2.6%
Other 5.4%