Files
register-referentie/docs/architecture/adr-0003-default-fill.md
Edwin van den Houdt 4b2af5c635
Some checks failed
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / unit (push) Has been cancelled
CI / compose-smoke (push) Has been cancelled
feat(acl): ACL skeleton — OpenZaak default-fill (refs #5) (#45)
2026-06-04 07:50:45 +00:00

45 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0003: ACL default-fill strategy
- **Status:** Accepted
- **Date:** 2026-06-04
- **Deciders:** Respellion engineering
- **Relates to:** S-04 (#5); builds on ADR-0001 (loose coupling)
## Context
The ACL is the only code that talks to ZGW APIs (ADR-0001 / CLAUDE.md §8.1). When the
domain asks it to "open a zaak", the domain payload is intentionally free of ZGW
specifics — it carries domain facts (e.g. the registrant's BSN), not OpenZaak fields. But
OpenZaak's `POST /zaken` requires ZGW-mandatory fields: `bronorganisatie`,
`verantwoordelijkeOrganisatie`, `startdatum`, `vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding`, and a
`zaaktype` URL. Something has to supply those, and it must not leak into the domain.
## Decision
**The ACL default-fills the ZGW-mandatory zaak fields; the domain never sees them.**
- `bronorganisatie`, `verantwoordelijkeOrganisatie`, `vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding`, and the
`zaaktype` URL come from **ACL configuration** (`AclDefaults` options) — not hardcoded,
not from the domain. This keeps them operationally manageable (the beheer portal will
edit them in S-15) and environment-specific (the seeded BIG zaaktype URL differs per env).
- `startdatum` is derived from an injected **clock** (today's date), so it is
deterministic in tests.
- The mapping from domain payload → ZGW `ZaakRequest` lives entirely inside the ACL
(`Application` builds the request from payload + defaults; `Infrastructure` serialises and
POSTs it). No other service constructs ZGW payloads or URLs.
## Consequences
- **Positive:** the domain stays ZGW-agnostic; ZGW knowledge is in one named place; defaults
are config (testable, env-specific, later editable via the beheer portal).
- **Cost:** the ACL must be configured per environment (the seeded zaaktype URL, the
organisation RSINs). Missing/invalid config fails fast at the ACL boundary.
- **Follow-ups:** mapping the BSN onto the zaak (eigenschap/rol), status transitions, and
documents are explicitly out of scope for S-04 and get their own slices.
## Alternatives considered
- **Defaults in the domain payload** — rejected: leaks ZGW concerns into the domain,
violating ADR-0001.
- **Hardcoded defaults in code** — rejected: not env-specific, not operationally editable.