Files
register-referentie/docs/architecture/adr-0023-observability-stack.md
T
not 94720f0fcb
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m21s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m11s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m19s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m57s
fix(observability): stop single-binary Tempo evicting its only ingester (closes #156) (#157)
## What & why

`verify-tracing` flaked on `verify-stack` run 722 — `FAIL — no single trace spanned ['bff', 'projection-api']` — and went green on a plain re-run of the same commit. **The trace chain was not broken; Tempo could not ingest:**

```
removing distributor_pool failing healthcheck addr=127.0.0.1:9095
  reason="rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded"
pusher failed to consume trace data  err="context canceled"   (x18)
```

The root cause is the *mechanism* of the data loss, not whatever caused the stall. Tempo runs **single-binary**, so the distributor and the ingester are the same process and the distributor's ingester pool holds exactly one, in-process, member. dskit nevertheless health-checks that member over loopback gRPC with a **1 s** deadline (`checkinterval: 15s`, confirmed from the running image's `/status/config`). On the shared runner a transient stall blows the deadline, the only ingester is evicted from the pool, and every subsequent push fails until the next check interval — spans silently dropped.

With one in-process ingester the health check can **never** route around a failure. Its only possible effect is to discard data. So it is off:

```yaml
ingester_client:
  pool_config:
    healthcheckenabled: false
```

This lands at the point where *both* candidate triggers named in #156 (GC pressure near `mem_limit`, CPU contention from the grown stack) turn into lost spans, so **`mem_limit: 400m` is untouched** — raising it on a memory-tight runner risks reintroducing the `verify-e2e` OOM of #144. It also does not paper over anything the way a longer `TRACING_TIMEOUT` would (#156's own note).

Second change: `infra/tracing-check.py` prints `tempo_distributor_ingester_clients` on its failure path. From the check's side, Tempo-dropped-spans and missing instrumentation look identical — that ambiguity is what cost a container-log dive on run 722. A recurrence now names itself.

Closes #156

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#156).
- [ ] **Failing test committed before the implementation — N/A, and deliberately so.** The trigger is runner load, so no deterministic red exists; the "red" is run 722's observed `verify-tracing` failure plus its Tempo logs. Same precedent as d5e5fa2 (#115, Playwright OOM) and 4aafd32 (#147, uWSGI caps). A test asserting the config says what the config says would add no gate: Tempo hard-fails on an unknown key (verified — `field health_check_enabled not found in type client.PoolConfig`), so a typo or a config rename on a Tempo bump already turns `verify-up` red.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #156`).
- [ ] CI green — the point of the change.
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (Tempo is not in `WAIT_SVCS`; config-only change, same image).
- [x] Docs updated — ADR-0023 Consequences.
- [x] ADR — amended **ADR-0023** rather than adding a new one: this is a consequence of that ADR's single-binary Tempo choice, not a new decision (one decision per ADR, §12).
- [x] Demo note — N/A, not user-visible.

## Notes for reviewers

Verified locally against the built image (the flake itself is not locally reproducible — see the runner-load point above):

1. `docker run --rm register-referentie/tempo:dev -config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml -config.verify=true` → parses.
2. `GET /status/config` on the running container → `healthcheckenabled: false` (was `true`).
3. The new diagnostic reads `tempo_distributor_ingester_clients` off a live Tempo.

Worth knowing: that metric is legitimately `0` on an idle Tempo — the pool is populated lazily on first push. It only prints on the failure path of a check that has already generated traffic, so the reading is meaningful there, but don't read a bare `0` on a quiet stack as an eviction.

Follow-up left undone: if `verify-tracing` still flakes after this, the next suspect is the .NET OTLP exporter timeout (#156's last note), not Tempo's memory cap.Reviewed-on: #157
2026-09-01 08:31:36 +00:00

83 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0023: Grafana-native observability stack (Tempo + Prometheus + Grafana)
- **Status:** Accepted
- **Date:** 2026-07-23
- **Deciders:** Respellion engineering
- **Slice:** S-16a (#122), first of the S-16 (#17) split
## Context
The PRD calls for "OpenTelemetry traces, Prometheus metrics; a local Grafana with
pre-built dashboards" (§80). S-16 was split (CLAUDE.md §13) into a backplane slice
(this one), distributed tracing (#123), and metrics + dashboards (#124). The
backplane must stand up first: a local, CI-friendly place for traces and metrics to
land, viewable in one UI, reaching green health within the 3-minute compose budget.
Two shape decisions are non-obvious enough to record.
## Decision
**Run a Grafana-native stack — Grafana Tempo (traces) + Prometheus (metrics) +
Grafana (UI) — with the services exporting OTLP straight to Tempo (no collector),
and ship the config baked into small built images.**
### Trace backend: Tempo (not Jaeger)
Tempo keeps everything under one Grafana pane alongside metrics (and later logs),
which is exactly the "local Grafana with dashboards" the PRD asks for. Jaeger would
add a second UI and a second mental model for no benefit at this scale.
### No OTLP collector
Tempo ingests OTLP directly (gRPC 4317 / HTTP 4318) and Prometheus scrapes each
service's `/metrics`, so a collector would be a hop that processes nothing. Skipped.
If we later need fan-out, tail sampling, or log processing, a collector is an
additive change — the services already speak OTLP.
### Config baked into built images, not config volumes
The upstream Common Ground modules (OpenZaak, NRC, Keycloak, Flowable) run as
**verbatim** images and get their config streamed into external named volumes by
`infra/seed-config.sh`, because bind mounts don't reach sibling containers on the
CI runner (see `docs/runbooks/gitea-actions-gotchas.md`). The observability tools
are **not** peer modules we must run verbatim, so we take the simpler path: a
three-line `Dockerfile` per tool that `COPY`s its config in. This reaches sibling
containers everywhere (docker, podman, CI) with no seed step, no `CFG_VOLS` entry,
and no Makefile sprawl.
### Verified, not assumed
`infra/run-observability-check.sh` (the `verify-observability` step, run early in CI
`verify-stack`) asks Grafana to reach both datasources — Prometheus via its health
method, Tempo via the datasource proxy (Tempo's Grafana plugin implements no health
method) — so the check proves the datasources are actually wired, not merely that
containers started. The containers are not in `WAIT_SVCS`; the check polls Grafana
itself, so no in-image healthcheck tool is required.
## Consequences
**Positive**
- One UI for traces + metrics + (future) logs. Config is versioned in
`infra/observability/` and self-contained in the images.
- Backplane is independent of app instrumentation — #123 and #124 build on it.
**Negative / costs**
- Three more images built each CI run (kept small; not on the health-gate list).
- Storage is ephemeral container fs — a demo backplane, not a retention target.
Object storage for Tempo / remote-write for Prometheus is a later concern.
- Tempo runs **single-binary**, so its distributor and ingester are one process and
some of its distributed-mode machinery is not just redundant but harmful. Its
ingester-pool health check is disabled (`ingester_client.pool_config`) because with
a single in-process ingester the check can never route around a failure — a 1s
loopback-gRPC deadline missed under CI load only evicted the one ingester and made
Tempo drop spans, which is how `verify-tracing` flaked (#156). Expect the same
shape from other distributed-mode knobs if we tune them; the fix is to switch to
real multi-ingester Tempo, not to re-enable them here.
## Coupling rules touched (CLAUDE.md §8)
None. The stack is passive infrastructure: services *push* OTLP and *expose*
`/metrics`; nothing in the stack calls into a service or a peer module.