Files
register-referentie/docs/architecture/adr-0034-caddy-serves-the-portals.md
T
not 2d40c84e2c docs(portals): ADR-0034 — Caddy serves the portals (refs #166)
Records the decision, the directive-order footgun that shapes the Caddyfiles, and
the measured cost (the images grew 75.7 MB → 90.6 MB). Also updates the three
frontend-decisions entries and the two other docs that named nginx.
2026-09-04 17:51:21 +02:00

104 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0034: The portals are served by Caddy, not nginx
- **Status:** Accepted
- **Date:** 2026-09-04
- **Deciders:** Respellion engineering
- **Slice:** _(none yet — raised directly alongside the Kubernetes deployment, ADR-0033)_
## Context
Each portal ships as one image that does two jobs: serve the built Angular app, and
reverse-proxy *its own* BFF endpoint group so the browser calls a single origin (no CORS,
and the DigiD/medewerker token rides along — ADR-0010, ADR-0013). Until now that was nginx
with a hand-written `nginx.conf` per app.
Two workarounds had accumulated around nginx's resolver, both for the same root cause:
**nginx resolves a variable `proxy_pass` upstream itself**, using only the `resolver`
directive, and never the search domains in `/etc/resolv.conf`.
1. `resolver 127.0.0.11` (Docker's embedded DNS) is wrong on rootless podman, which uses a
network-specific aardvark address — so `apps/portal-nginx-resolver.sh` rewrote the
directive at container start by reading the pod's actual nameserver.
2. On Kubernetes the bare `bff` name cannot resolve at all without the `svc.cluster.local`
search domain, so the same script gained a `BFF_HOST` override that the Helm chart set
per portal (ADR-0033).
Both existed only to tell the proxy how to resolve one hostname.
## Decision
**Serve the portals with `caddy:2-alpine` and a small `Caddyfile` per app, replacing the
nginx runtime stage, the four `nginx.conf` files, and the resolver workaround.**
Caddy dials its upstream per request through Go's resolver, which reads
`/etc/resolv.conf` — nameserver *and* search domains. So `reverse_proxy bff:8080` resolves
correctly under Docker, rootless podman and Kubernetes with no per-engine configuration,
and it still starts before the BFF exists and picks up its restarts (the property the
variable `proxy_pass` was there to buy). `apps/portal-nginx-resolver.sh`, its unit test and
the chart's `BFF_HOST` env are deleted.
The Caddyfile uses `handle` blocks rather than a bare `try_files`:
```
handle /behandel/* { reverse_proxy bff:8080 }
handle { root * /usr/share/caddy; try_files {path} /index.html; file_server }
```
`handle` blocks are mutually exclusive and matched most-specific-first. This matters:
Caddy's default directive order puts rewrites (`try_files`) *before* `reverse_proxy`, so a
top-level `try_files {path} /index.html` would rewrite every API path to `/index.html`
before the proxy ever saw it — the SPA fallback would silently eat the API. The `handle`
form makes the routing explicit instead of relying on directive-order trivia.
`infra/test_portal_caddyfiles.py` (in `make unit`) asserts each portal proxies exactly its
own endpoint groups and keeps the SPA fallback. The four files are near-identical, so a
copy-paste slip is cheap to make and expensive to find: proxying another portal's group
hands a browser an endpoint its token isn't for, and the failure surfaces as a 401 three
services away.
### Alternatives considered
- **Keep nginx.** Zero migration, and it works — but the resolver workaround stays, and it
had already grown a second head for Kubernetes. Both heads are nginx-specific.
- **Keep nginx, hard-code the FQDN.** Would need a different config per deployment target
(compose vs Kubernetes), which is exactly the fork the chart was written to avoid.
- **Drop the proxy and use CORS.** Turns the same-origin design (ADR-0010) inside out:
CORS preflights, an explicit origin allowlist in the BFF, and a token attached
cross-origin. Not a serving decision — an architectural regression.
- **Kubernetes Ingress in front of the portals.** Solves nothing about compose, adds a
controller, and the portals would still need something to serve static files.
- ponytail ceiling: plain HTTP on `:80`, no compression, no cache headers beyond Caddy's
defaults, and Caddy's automatic HTTPS deliberately unused (there is no hostname to get a
certificate for). Upgrade path: `encode zstd gzip` and a cache policy for immutable
Angular bundles; a real hostname makes TLS a one-line `Caddyfile` change, which is the
main reason this is worth having in place.
## Consequences
**Positive**
- One resolver behaviour across compose, podman and Kubernetes; a script, a unit test and a
chart env var are deleted rather than maintained.
- The images gain `curl` for free (the alpine nginx image had only busybox `wget`), which
the compose healthchecks can use.
- Routing intent is readable: one `handle` block per endpoint group, one for the app.
- TLS later is a one-line change instead of a new component.
**Negative / costs**
- A new runtime dependency in four images (CLAUDE.md §13): Caddy replaces nginx rather than
joining it, so the count is unchanged, but it is a less familiar config language for
anyone who has only read nginx configs.
- The images grew: 90.6 MB against nginx's 75.7 MB, because `caddy:2-alpine` carries a
bigger static binary than nginx's. Measured, not estimated.
- Caddy's directive-order rule is a genuine footgun (see above); the `handle` form and the
Caddyfile comments exist to keep the next person out of it.
- Any operational note that says "the portal's nginx" is now wrong; the ones in `docs/` were
updated with this ADR.
## Coupling rules touched (CLAUDE.md §8)
None. §8.3 is unchanged and unchanged in kind: the portals still talk only to the BFF, and
the proxy is still the thing that makes that same-origin.