Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
notandClaude Opus 5 a87a32e269 docs(infra): document MFA on the medewerker realm + ADR-0031 (refs #132)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m24s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 3m27s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 9m41s
Runbook gains an MFA section and how to get a code; synthetic-data lists the fixture
TOTP secret and the extra grant parameter; demo-script gains the S-15c note and its
staff logins now mention the second factor. check_realms.py grows an 'otp' argument
that prints a current code for a manual demo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 09:11:03 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 5 3567bc1f42 feat(infra): enforce MFA on the medewerker realm (refs #132)
Every seeded medewerker carries a TOTP credential, so Keycloak's conditional-OTP
step in both the browser and direct-grant flows always challenges them; a password
alone no longer yields a token. CONFIGURE_TOTP becomes a default required action so
any medewerker added later must enrol before logging in.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 09:08:50 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 5 30c5279e90 test(infra): medewerker login must be refused without a second factor (refs #132)
The keycloak smoke check now asserts that a password-only grant on the medewerker
realm is rejected and that a TOTP code completes it. The e2e medewerker logins move
to a shared helper that submits Keycloak's OTP challenge. Both fail against the
current realm export, which enforces no MFA.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 09:07:45 +02:00
not 94720f0fcb fix(observability): stop single-binary Tempo evicting its only ingester (closes #156) (#157)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m21s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m11s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m19s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m57s
## What & why

`verify-tracing` flaked on `verify-stack` run 722 — `FAIL — no single trace spanned ['bff', 'projection-api']` — and went green on a plain re-run of the same commit. **The trace chain was not broken; Tempo could not ingest:**

```
removing distributor_pool failing healthcheck addr=127.0.0.1:9095
  reason="rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded"
pusher failed to consume trace data  err="context canceled"   (x18)
```

The root cause is the *mechanism* of the data loss, not whatever caused the stall. Tempo runs **single-binary**, so the distributor and the ingester are the same process and the distributor's ingester pool holds exactly one, in-process, member. dskit nevertheless health-checks that member over loopback gRPC with a **1 s** deadline (`checkinterval: 15s`, confirmed from the running image's `/status/config`). On the shared runner a transient stall blows the deadline, the only ingester is evicted from the pool, and every subsequent push fails until the next check interval — spans silently dropped.

With one in-process ingester the health check can **never** route around a failure. Its only possible effect is to discard data. So it is off:

```yaml
ingester_client:
  pool_config:
    healthcheckenabled: false
```

This lands at the point where *both* candidate triggers named in #156 (GC pressure near `mem_limit`, CPU contention from the grown stack) turn into lost spans, so **`mem_limit: 400m` is untouched** — raising it on a memory-tight runner risks reintroducing the `verify-e2e` OOM of #144. It also does not paper over anything the way a longer `TRACING_TIMEOUT` would (#156's own note).

Second change: `infra/tracing-check.py` prints `tempo_distributor_ingester_clients` on its failure path. From the check's side, Tempo-dropped-spans and missing instrumentation look identical — that ambiguity is what cost a container-log dive on run 722. A recurrence now names itself.

Closes #156

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#156).
- [ ] **Failing test committed before the implementation — N/A, and deliberately so.** The trigger is runner load, so no deterministic red exists; the "red" is run 722's observed `verify-tracing` failure plus its Tempo logs. Same precedent as d5e5fa2 (#115, Playwright OOM) and 4aafd32 (#147, uWSGI caps). A test asserting the config says what the config says would add no gate: Tempo hard-fails on an unknown key (verified — `field health_check_enabled not found in type client.PoolConfig`), so a typo or a config rename on a Tempo bump already turns `verify-up` red.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #156`).
- [ ] CI green — the point of the change.
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (Tempo is not in `WAIT_SVCS`; config-only change, same image).
- [x] Docs updated — ADR-0023 Consequences.
- [x] ADR — amended **ADR-0023** rather than adding a new one: this is a consequence of that ADR's single-binary Tempo choice, not a new decision (one decision per ADR, §12).
- [x] Demo note — N/A, not user-visible.

## Notes for reviewers

Verified locally against the built image (the flake itself is not locally reproducible — see the runner-load point above):

1. `docker run --rm register-referentie/tempo:dev -config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml -config.verify=true` → parses.
2. `GET /status/config` on the running container → `healthcheckenabled: false` (was `true`).
3. The new diagnostic reads `tempo_distributor_ingester_clients` off a live Tempo.

Worth knowing: that metric is legitimately `0` on an idle Tempo — the pool is populated lazily on first push. It only prints on the failure path of a check that has already generated traffic, so the reading is meaningful there, but don't read a bare `0` on a quiet stack as an eviction.

Follow-up left undone: if `verify-tracing` still flakes after this, the next suspect is the .NET OTLP exporter timeout (#156's last note), not Tempo's memory cap.Reviewed-on: #157
2026-09-01 08:31:36 +00:00
13 changed files with 278 additions and 30 deletions
@@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ itself, so no in-image healthcheck tool is required.
- Three more images built each CI run (kept small; not on the health-gate list).
- Storage is ephemeral container fs — a demo backplane, not a retention target.
Object storage for Tempo / remote-write for Prometheus is a later concern.
- Tempo runs **single-binary**, so its distributor and ingester are one process and
some of its distributed-mode machinery is not just redundant but harmful. Its
ingester-pool health check is disabled (`ingester_client.pool_config`) because with
a single in-process ingester the check can never route around a failure — a 1s
loopback-gRPC deadline missed under CI load only evicted the one ingester and made
Tempo drop spans, which is how `verify-tracing` flaked (#156). Expect the same
shape from other distributed-mode knobs if we tune them; the fix is to switch to
real multi-ingester Tempo, not to re-enable them here.
## Coupling rules touched (CLAUDE.md §8)
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# ADR-0031 — MFA on the medewerker realm, with a fixture TOTP secret
- **Status:** Accepted
- **Date:** 2026-09-03
- **Slice:** S-15c (Gitea #132)
## Context
Staff (behandelaar, teamlead, beheerder) act on citizens' registrations and on the ACL's
default-fill: the highest-privilege logins in the platform. The medewerker realm protected
them with a password alone, while the citizen realms (digid, eherkenning, eidas) mock
brokers that carry their own assurance levels. A reference application that demonstrates a
government architecture should show MFA on the staff realm.
Two things had to be decided: **how** to enforce OTP in a realm export, and **how the
automated checks and a human demo obtain a code** — the e2e drives a real browser login and
`make keycloak-smoke` drives a real password grant, so neither can scan a QR.
## Decision
**Enforce OTP by giving every seeded medewerker a TOTP credential**, rather than replacing
Keycloak's browser flow with a copy whose OTP execution is `REQUIRED`.
Keycloak's stock `browser` and `direct grant` flows both contain a *conditional OTP*
subflow that fires when the user has an OTP credential. Seeding the credential therefore
turns the challenge on for every seeded user, in both flows, without duplicating ~40 lines
of flow JSON into the export. `CONFIGURE_TOTP` is additionally set as a **default required
action**, so a medewerker created later must enrol before their first login.
**The seeded secret is a fixed, committed fixture** (`BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED`) shared by all
medewerkers. Codes are then computable: `infra/keycloak/check_realms.py` (Python, stdlib
`hmac`) and `tests/e2e/medewerker-login.ts` (Node `crypto`) each implement RFC 6238 in
about six lines — no OTP dependency on either side, and no enrolment step in the tests.
## Consequences
- A password alone no longer yields a token on the medewerker realm; `check_realms.py`
asserts that refusal, so the enforcement cannot silently regress.
- Every medewerker login in the e2e goes through `loginMedewerker()`, which submits the OTP
form. New staff specs must use it.
- **The secret is public.** It is a demo fixture and worthless outside this synthetic
stack, in the same class as the committed `test123` passwords and the mock DigiD broker.
A real deployment enrols per-user authenticators (or federates to DigiD Machtigen /
eHerkenning at the required assurance level) and seeds no credentials at all.
- Enforcement is *effectively* realm-wide but *technically* per-user: the conditional
subflow is what fires. A medewerker whose OTP credential were removed would fall back to
the required action at next login (enrol, then challenge) rather than skipping MFA — an
acceptable equivalence for this purpose, and the reason the required action is set.
- Reversal is a one-file edit: drop the `otp` credentials and the `requiredActions` block.
+36 -4
View File
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ zaaktype cache). Store is in-memory: an edit reverts to the configured env on re
```bash
make up
# 1. Log in as bram-beheerder / test123 → "Default-fill" tab → change a value → Opslaan.
# 1. Log in as bram-beheerder / test123 + OTP (`python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp`)
# → "Default-fill" tab → change a value → Opslaan.
open http://localhost:8143/default-fill
#
# 2. Automated: the ACL uses the current default-fill per zaak (unit) and the endpoints are behind the
@@ -161,7 +162,8 @@ directly (ADR-0025); managing the default-fill config (S-15b) and MFA (S-15c) co
```bash
make up
# 1. Log in as bram-beheerder / test123 → the catalogus lists the published zaaktypen.
# 1. Log in as bram-beheerder / test123 + OTP (`python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp`)
# → the catalogus lists the published zaaktypen.
open http://localhost:8143
#
# 2. Automated (a CI verify-stack e2e): a beheerder logs in and sees BIG-REGISTRATIE.
@@ -304,7 +306,8 @@ make verify-local # → "OK — a fresh local stack completed the flow with
# 3. Or by hand in the browser: log in at http://localhost:8140 (jan-burger / test123), submit +
# upload a PDF, then approve it in the werkbak at http://localhost:8142 (merel-behandelaar /
# test123); it shows as INGESCHREVEN in the openbaar register at http://localhost:8141.
# test123 + OTP, see S-15c); it shows as INGESCHREVEN in the openbaar register at
# http://localhost:8141.
```
> The zaaktype is discovered by the ACL itself since S-27 (below); `local-seed`'s `acl.env` now
@@ -589,7 +592,7 @@ or **afwijzen** — which also completes the Beoordelen task so the process adva
```text
# 1. Open the behandel portal and log in as a behandelaar (medewerker realm):
# http://localhost:8142/ → merel-behandelaar / test123
# http://localhost:8142/ → merel-behandelaar / test123 + OTP
#
# 2. The werkbak lists the registrations awaiting beoordeling (referentie / bsn / status).
# Find the reference from the submit confirmation and click "Goedkeuren" on that row.
@@ -812,3 +815,32 @@ make verify-domain # → "the timed-out registration's zaak was cancelled to
`POST /annuleringen` → ZGW `resultaten` + `statussen` (Geannuleerd); the aggregate then moves to
`Verlopen`. The ACL cancels the zaak **before** the aggregate is expired, so a failed ZGW call leaves the
job for redelivery rather than diverging the two (ADR-0019).
---
## S-15c — MFA on the medewerker realm (#132, ADR-0031)
**Outcome:** staff logins (behandel + beheer portals) need a **second factor**. The medewerker realm
seeds every medewerker with a TOTP credential, so Keycloak's conditional-OTP step challenges them in
both the browser flow and the direct grant; a password alone no longer yields a token. `CONFIGURE_TOTP`
is a default required action, so a medewerker added later must enrol first. Citizen realms (digid,
eherkenning, eidas) are unchanged — they mock brokers that carry their own assurance.
```bash
# 1. Manual: log in to the behandel portal. After username + password Keycloak asks for a code.
python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp # a valid code, right now
open http://localhost:8142 # merel-behandelaar / test123 + that code
#
# 2. Automated: the realm smoke check asserts the password alone is REFUSED, then that
# password + TOTP succeeds and still carries the behandelaar role:
make keycloak-smoke # → "medewerker merel-behandelaar password-only login refused [OK]"
#
# 3. End-to-end: every staff login in the e2e goes through the OTP prompt (loginMedewerker):
make verify-e2e # → registration.spec (behandelaar approves), catalogus.spec, default-fill.spec
```
**The path:** the seeded `otp` credential in `infra/keycloak/realms/medewerker-realm.json` activates
Keycloak's stock conditional-OTP subflow — no custom browser flow. The fixture secret is shared and
committed on purpose so the checks can compute codes; a real deployment enrols per-user authenticators
(ADR-0031).
+30
View File
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ login per realm and asserts the identifying claim:
| eidas | pierre-dupont | `eidas_id` |
| medewerker | merel-behandelaar | role `behandelaar` |
The medewerker row also asserts that the password **alone** is refused — that realm
enforces MFA (below).
All test users / credentials are in [../synthetic-data.md](../synthetic-data.md).
## Notes
@@ -35,3 +38,30 @@ All test users / credentials are in [../synthetic-data.md](../synthetic-data.md)
- **Image** pinned to `quay.io/keycloak/keycloak:26.1`.
- Claims are injected by OIDC protocol mappers on `big-portal` (user attribute → token
claim); `medewerker` roles come through `realm_access.roles`.
## MFA on the medewerker realm (S-15c)
Staff logins (behandel + beheer portals) need a second factor; citizen/company realms
(digid, eherkenning, eidas) do not. Two halves in `medewerker-realm.json`:
- Every seeded medewerker carries a **TOTP credential** with the fixture secret
`BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED`, so Keycloak's built-in *conditional OTP* step fires on every
login — browser flow (an `#otp` prompt after the password) and direct grant (a `totp`
form field) alike.
- `CONFIGURE_TOTP` is a **default required action**, so any medewerker added later must
enrol an authenticator before the first login.
See [../architecture/adr-0031-mfa-on-the-medewerker-realm.md](../architecture/adr-0031-mfa-on-the-medewerker-realm.md).
### Getting a code
```bash
python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp # prints a valid 6-digit code right now
```
Or enrol a phone once: the secret in base32 is `IJEUOTKFIRCVORKSJNCVET2UKBJUKRKE`
(`otpauth://totp/medewerker?secret=IJEUOTKFIRCVORKSJNCVET2UKBJUKRKE`). The e2e computes its
own code in `tests/e2e/medewerker-login.ts`.
**Fixture only.** A shared, committed secret is a demo convenience, never a production
posture — see the ADR's consequences.
+8
View File
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ All test users share the password **`test123`**.
| `eidas` | eIDAS (EU) | `pierre-dupont` | `eidas_id` = `FR/NL/AB-1234-5678` |
| `medewerker` | Internal staff | `merel-behandelaar` | role `behandelaar` |
| `medewerker` | Internal staff | `tom-teamlead` | roles `behandelaar`, `teamlead` |
| `medewerker` | Internal staff | `bram-beheerder` | role `beheerder` |
`medewerker` users additionally need a **second factor**: that realm enforces MFA (S-15c,
ADR-0031). All three share the fixture TOTP secret `BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED`; print a current
code with `python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp`.
The identifying claims are injected via OIDC protocol mappers on `big-portal`
(user-attribute → token claim); `medewerker` roles appear in `realm_access.roles`.
@@ -32,5 +37,8 @@ curl -s -X POST \
-d username=jan-burger -d password=test123 -d scope=openid | jq -r .access_token
```
For a `medewerker` user, add `-d totp=$(python3 infra/keycloak/check_realms.py otp)` —
without it the grant is refused with `invalid_grant`.
Decode the JWT payload to see the `bsn` claim. `make keycloak-smoke` checks every realm
automatically.
+46 -12
View File
@@ -1,19 +1,25 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Smoke-check the Keycloak realms: each realm's OIDC login works (password grant)
and returns its expected identifying claim. Stdlib only. Exits non-zero on failure.
and returns its expected identifying claim. The medewerker realm additionally enforces
MFA (S-15c), so its login must be refused without a TOTP code. Stdlib only.
Exits non-zero on failure.
"""
import base64, json, sys, urllib.error, urllib.parse, urllib.request
import base64, hashlib, hmac, json, struct, sys, time, urllib.error, urllib.parse, urllib.request
BASE = "http://localhost:8180"
CLIENT = "big-portal"
PWD = "test123"
# realm, user, claim ("__roles__" => check realm_access.roles), expected-contains
# Fixture TOTP secret seeded into every medewerker in infra/keycloak/realms/medewerker-realm.json.
# Keycloak HMACs the raw secret bytes, so no base32 decoding is involved.
OTP_SECRET = b"BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED"
# realm, user, claim ("__roles__" => check realm_access.roles), expected-contains, mfa-enforced
CHECKS = [
("digid", "jan-burger", "bsn", "123456782"),
("eherkenning", "acme-ondernemer", "kvk", "12345678"),
("eidas", "pierre-dupont", "eidas_id", "FR/NL"),
("medewerker", "merel-behandelaar", "__roles__", "behandelaar"),
("digid", "jan-burger", "bsn", "123456782", False),
("eherkenning", "acme-ondernemer", "kvk", "12345678", False),
("eidas", "pierre-dupont", "eidas_id", "FR/NL", False),
("medewerker", "merel-behandelaar", "__roles__", "behandelaar", True),
]
@@ -23,10 +29,17 @@ def decode(jwt):
return json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(p))
def grant(realm, user):
def totp(secret=OTP_SECRET, period=30, digits=6):
"""RFC 6238 code: HMAC-SHA1 over the 30-second counter, dynamically truncated."""
mac = hmac.new(secret, struct.pack(">Q", int(time.time()) // period), hashlib.sha1).digest()
o = mac[-1] & 0x0F
return str((struct.unpack(">I", mac[o:o + 4])[0] & 0x7FFFFFFF) % 10 ** digits).zfill(digits)
def grant(realm, user, **extra):
data = urllib.parse.urlencode({
"grant_type": "password", "client_id": CLIENT,
"username": user, "password": PWD, "scope": "openid",
"username": user, "password": PWD, "scope": "openid", **extra,
}).encode()
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{BASE}/realms/{realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token", data=data,
@@ -35,11 +48,27 @@ def grant(realm, user):
return json.loads(r.read())
def second_factor_refused(realm, user):
"""The password alone must not yield a token on an MFA-enforced realm."""
try:
grant(realm, user)
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
return e.code in (400, 401)
return False
def main():
ok = True
for realm, user, claim, expect in CHECKS:
for realm, user, claim, expect, mfa in CHECKS:
extra = {}
if mfa:
refused = second_factor_refused(realm, user)
ok = ok and refused
print(f"{realm:12} {user:18} password-only login refused "
f"[{'OK' if refused else 'MFA NOT ENFORCED'}]")
extra = {"totp": totp()}
try:
at = decode(grant(realm, user)["access_token"])
at = decode(grant(realm, user, **extra)["access_token"])
if claim == "__roles__":
val = at.get("realm_access", {}).get("roles", [])
good = expect in val
@@ -57,4 +86,9 @@ def main():
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
# `check_realms.py otp` prints a current code for the fixture secret — what a human demoing
# the medewerker portals types at Keycloak's OTP prompt (docs/runbooks/keycloak.md).
if len(sys.argv) > 1 and sys.argv[1] == "otp":
print(totp())
else:
main()
+37 -3
View File
@@ -2,6 +2,16 @@
"realm": "medewerker",
"enabled": true,
"displayName": "Medewerkers",
"requiredActions": [
{
"alias": "CONFIGURE_TOTP",
"name": "Configure OTP",
"providerId": "CONFIGURE_TOTP",
"enabled": true,
"defaultAction": true,
"priority": 10
}
],
"roles": {
"realm": [
{ "name": "behandelaar", "description": "Behandelt registratieaanvragen" },
@@ -43,7 +53,15 @@
"lastName": "Behandelaar",
"email": "merel@big.example.nl",
"emailVerified": true,
"credentials": [{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false }],
"credentials": [
{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false },
{
"type": "otp",
"userLabel": "seeded TOTP (fixture)",
"secretData": "{\"value\":\"BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED\"}",
"credentialData": "{\"subType\":\"totp\",\"digits\":6,\"counter\":0,\"period\":30,\"algorithm\":\"HmacSHA1\"}"
}
],
"realmRoles": ["behandelaar"]
},
{
@@ -53,7 +71,15 @@
"lastName": "Teamlead",
"email": "tom@big.example.nl",
"emailVerified": true,
"credentials": [{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false }],
"credentials": [
{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false },
{
"type": "otp",
"userLabel": "seeded TOTP (fixture)",
"secretData": "{\"value\":\"BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED\"}",
"credentialData": "{\"subType\":\"totp\",\"digits\":6,\"counter\":0,\"period\":30,\"algorithm\":\"HmacSHA1\"}"
}
],
"realmRoles": ["behandelaar", "teamlead"]
},
{
@@ -63,7 +89,15 @@
"lastName": "Beheerder",
"email": "bram@big.example.nl",
"emailVerified": true,
"credentials": [{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false }],
"credentials": [
{ "type": "password", "value": "test123", "temporary": false },
{
"type": "otp",
"userLabel": "seeded TOTP (fixture)",
"secretData": "{\"value\":\"BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED\"}",
"credentialData": "{\"subType\":\"totp\",\"digits\":6,\"counter\":0,\"period\":30,\"algorithm\":\"HmacSHA1\"}"
}
],
"realmRoles": ["beheerder"]
}
]
+12
View File
@@ -25,3 +25,15 @@ storage:
path: /var/tempo/blocks
wal:
path: /var/tempo/wal
# #156: don't let the distributor evict its own ingester. Tempo runs single-binary here, so the
# distributor and the ingester are the same process and the "pool" holds exactly one, in-process,
# member. dskit still health-checks it over loopback gRPC with a 1s deadline (checkinterval 15s);
# on the shared CI runner a transient stall blows that deadline, the only ingester is dropped from
# the pool ("removing distributor_pool failing healthcheck"), and every push then fails ("pusher
# failed to consume trace data", err="context canceled") until the next check — silently losing
# spans, which is how verify-tracing flaked. With one in-process ingester the check can never route
# around a failure, so it can only ever discard data. Turn it off.
ingester_client:
pool_config:
healthcheckenabled: false
+15
View File
@@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ def services_in_trace(trace_id):
return names
def tempo_ingest_state():
"""#156: distinguish a broken trace chain from Tempo dropping spans. `ingester_clients` is 0
when the distributor has evicted its (single, in-process) ingester over a failed loopback
health check — pushes fail and spans are lost, which looks identical to missing instrumentation
from here. Diagnostics only; never fails the check."""
try:
for line in _get(f"{TEMPO}/metrics").decode().splitlines():
if line.startswith("tempo_distributor_ingester_clients "):
return f"tempo {line.strip()} (0 = no ingester in the pool — evicted, so pushes\n are failing and spans are being dropped; see #156)"
except Exception as e:
return f"tempo /metrics unreadable: {e}"
return "tempo_distributor_ingester_clients not reported"
def main():
deadline = time.time() + TIMEOUT
generate_traffic()
@@ -74,6 +88,7 @@ def main():
generate_traffic()
print(f"FAIL — no single trace spanned {sorted(WANT)}; services seen: {sorted(seen)}",
file=sys.stderr)
print(f" {tempo_ingest_state()}", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test';
import { loginMedewerker } from './medewerker-login';
// S-15a walking skeleton: a beheerder logs in to the beheer portal (medewerker realm) and sees the
// read-only ZTC catalogus. The verify stack seeds and publishes the BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype (the
@@ -7,10 +8,9 @@ import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test';
test('a beheerder sees the published zaaktypen in the catalogus', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('http://beheer/');
// The beheer portal redirects to the Keycloak medewerker realm login (same realm as behandel).
await page.locator('#username').fill('bram-beheerder');
await page.locator('#password').fill('test123');
await page.locator('#kc-login').click();
// The beheer portal redirects to the Keycloak medewerker realm login (same realm as behandel),
// which enforces MFA: password, then a TOTP code.
await loginMedewerker(page, 'bram-beheerder');
await expect(page.getByRole('heading', { name: /Catalogus/i })).toBeVisible();
+3 -4
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test';
import { loginMedewerker } from './medewerker-login';
// S-15b: a beheerder edits the ACL default-fill in the beheer portal and gets a saved confirmation.
// Runs against the shared verify stack; it edits + saves (the ACL store is in-memory, ADR-0026) and
@@ -6,10 +7,8 @@ import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test';
test('a beheerder edits and saves the default-fill', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('http://beheer/');
// Keycloak medewerker-realm login (same realm as behandel).
await page.locator('#username').fill('bram-beheerder');
await page.locator('#password').fill('test123');
await page.locator('#kc-login').click();
// Keycloak medewerker-realm login (same realm as behandel) — password + enforced TOTP.
await loginMedewerker(page, 'bram-beheerder');
await expect(page.getByRole('heading', { name: /Catalogus/i })).toBeVisible();
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
import { createHmac } from 'node:crypto';
import type { Page } from '@playwright/test';
// The medewerker realm enforces MFA (S-15c), so a staff login is two steps: password, then a TOTP
// code. The realm export seeds every medewerker with this fixture secret — Keycloak HMACs the raw
// secret bytes — so the e2e can compute a valid code instead of enrolling an authenticator.
const OTP_SECRET = 'BIGMEDEWERKEROTPSEED';
// RFC 6238 TOTP: HMAC-SHA1 over the 30-second counter, dynamically truncated to 6 digits.
export function totp(secret = OTP_SECRET, at = Date.now()): string {
const counter = Buffer.alloc(8);
counter.writeBigUInt64BE(BigInt(Math.floor(at / 1000 / 30)));
const mac = createHmac('sha1', secret).update(counter).digest();
const offset = mac[mac.length - 1] & 0x0f;
return String((mac.readUInt32BE(offset) & 0x7fffffff) % 1_000_000).padStart(6, '0');
}
export async function loginMedewerker(page: Page, username: string): Promise<void> {
await page.locator('#username').fill(username);
await page.locator('#password').fill('test123');
await page.locator('#kc-login').click();
// Keycloak's conditional-OTP step. Its lookAheadWindow accepts the neighbouring counters, so a
// code computed just before a 30-second boundary still validates — no retry needed.
await page.locator('#otp').fill(totp());
await page.locator('#kc-login').click();
}
+3 -3
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import { expect, request, test } from '@playwright/test';
import { loginMedewerker } from './medewerker-login';
// Walking-skeleton happy path (S-08d + S-09 + S-09b + S-12 + S-10a + S-19b-2): a zorgprofessional
// logs in via mock DigiD and submits through the self-service portal → BFF → domain; the entry
@@ -76,9 +77,8 @@ test('DigiD submit → public INGEDIEND → documenten → behandelaar goedkeurt
// — the S-12 flow that replaces the temporary admin endpoint. The staff tab switches to the
// medewerker realm (a different Keycloak realm than the citizen's digid session).
await staff.goto('http://behandel/');
await staff.locator('#username').fill('merel-behandelaar');
await staff.locator('#password').fill('test123');
await staff.locator('#kc-login').click();
// That realm enforces MFA (S-15c), so the behandelaar logs in with password + TOTP.
await loginMedewerker(staff, 'merel-behandelaar');
await expect(staff.getByRole('heading', { name: /Werkbak/i })).toBeVisible();