Commit Graph
8 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
not 4777ff2b1d feat(workflow): document-wait task + 30-day timeout cancellation (S-10a, closes #102) (#105)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m14s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m37s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m17s
## What & why

S-10a, the **workflow/timeout spine** of the (split) document-upload slice: the registratie process
now parks at a **`WachtOpDocumenten`** user task with an **interrupting `P30D` boundary timer**. When
the documents arrive the task completes and the process continues into the diploma routing (S-13) →
Beoordelen; if the 30 days lapse, the timer cancels the wait, runs a `RegistratieVerlopen`
external-worker task, and the domain expires the aggregate to a new terminal status **`Verlopen`**.
Backend only — the real upload trigger (portal → BFF → ACL → Documenten API) is S-10b (#103).

Closes #102

Mechanism recorded in **ADR-0017**; opened as proposal #104. Mirrors the S-14 escalation
(boundary-timer + external-worker) and S-11 withdrawal (interrupting cancel) patterns.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green pairs per layer).
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #102`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR).
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (no new services; deploy path unchanged).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0017, demo-script, BACKLOG split).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0017-document-wait-timeout-cancellation.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- **Domain** (`Registration.Expire()` + `Verlopen`), **application** (`ExpireRegistrationWorker`),
  **infra** (`RegistratieVerlopenProcessor`/`Pump`, `IRegistratieVerlopenClient`, Flowable
  acquire/complete + `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync`) — the timeout counterpart to the OpenZaak/escalation
  worker trios; idempotent per §8.6.
- **BPMN** verified live against a `flowable-rest` probe: complete `WachtOpDocumenten` → routes to
  Beoordelen; fire the P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job (carrying `registrationId`) + the wait
  task cancelled. `verify-domain` exercises both branches in-stack (completes the wait in every existing
  block; fires the timer and asserts `Verlopen` in a new block).
- **Scope boundary:** on expiry the aggregate goes `Verlopen` and the process ends, but the ZGW *zaak*
  is not yet set to a cancellation status — that needs a new ACL method + statustype seeding and is
  folded into S-10b (noted in ADR-0017).
- `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync` is built and HTTP-tested here but not yet called from a domain endpoint;
  S-10b wires the upload trigger to it.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Reviewed-on: #105
2026-07-20 09:42:02 +00:00
not ccae27b3da feat(workflow): diploma-eligibility DMN routes foreign diplomas via CBGV-advies (S-13, closes #14) (#101)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m16s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 58s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m29s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m20s
## What & why

S-13: a diploma's origin decides its route. A **DMN** (`diploma-eligibility`) is evaluated inline by
the registratie process as a **`businessRuleTask`**; an exclusive gateway routes a **foreign**
(Buitenlands) diploma through a new **CBGVAdvies** user task before `Beoordelen`, a **domestic** one
straight there (PRD flow 4). The domain's only new job is carrying the diploma origin and passing it
as a process start variable.

Chose **Option B (DMN in the BPMN)** over the issue's literal "evaluated by the Domain Service via
Workflow Client" wording — keeps the decision a first-class workflow artefact and §8.2 clean.
Rationale in **ADR-0016** (proposal #100); noted on this issue.

Closes #14

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #14`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (additive; DMN deployed by flowable-init).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0016, demo note).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0016-diploma-eligibility-dmn.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## How it was built (TDD)

- **Domain**: `DiplomaOrigin` on the aggregate + submit command; threaded through the process-start port so the Workflow Client emits a `diplomaOrigin` start variable. Red → green.
- **DMN + BPMN**: `workflows/diploma-eligibility.dmn` (origin → route); `businessRuleTask` + exclusive gateway + `CBGVAdvies` user task in `registratie.bpmn`; DMN deployed to Flowable's DMN engine by `flowable-init`.
- **Both paths**: `Een diploma op herkomst routeren` acceptance scenarios (origin carried into the process) + unit tests; verify-domain drives a foreign registration through CBGVAdvies→Beoordelen and the domestic one straight to Beoordelen — exercising both DMN branches live.

## Notes for reviewers

- Deviation from the issue's Option-A wording is deliberate and recorded (ADR-0016); the outcome is unchanged.
- The self-service eIDAS→foreign wiring is out of scope here (this slice is area:domain + area:workflow); the domain submit accepts an optional `diplomaOrigin` so the foreign path is drivable.
- Local green: domain unit 109, acceptance 15, `dotnet format`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 95.39%** (break 90). The DMN/`businessRuleTask` REST wiring is CI-verified on verify-stack (no local full-stack run here).

Reviewed-on: #101
2026-07-20 07:26:52 +00:00
not 7bcbc726ce feat(workflow): beoordeling escalation to teamlead after 14 days (S-14, closes #15) (#99)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 56s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m11s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m30s
## What & why

S-14: a beoordeling a behandelaar does not pick up within **14 days** escalates to the **teamlead**.

A non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on the `Beoordelen` user task fires an external-worker task
(`BeoordelingEscaleren`); the domain's escalation worker reassigns the still-open task's candidate group
from `behandelaar` to `teamlead`. The task keeps its identity — only who may claim it changes. The
escalation-via-external-worker decision is recorded in **ADR-0015** (proposal #98); it upholds §8.2
(the Workflow Client stays the only code that talks to Flowable) and keeps Flowable a stock image.

Closes #15

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #NN`).
- [x] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (no new services; escalation is additive to the domain worker).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0015, demo note).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0015-beoordeling-escalation.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## How it was built (TDD)

- **Workflow Client** (`IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`): acquire `BeoordelingEscaleren` jobs → find the open `Beoordelen` task in the instance → add `teamlead`/remove `behandelaar` candidate group → complete the job. Red → green.
- **Escalation drain loop** (`BeoordelingEscalatieProcessor`) + hosted `BeoordelingEscalatiePump`, mirroring the OpenZaak worker. Red → green.
- **BPMN**: non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on `Beoordelen` → external task → escalation end.
- **Both branches** (escalate after timeout; no-op when completed in time) covered by the `Een beoordeling escaleren` acceptance scenarios + Workflow Client unit tests.
- **Live integration**: `verify-domain` fires the timer early via Flowable's management API and asserts the reassignment to teamlead.

## Notes for reviewers

- Interface segregation: escalation is on `IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`, separate from the OpenZaak worker's `IExternalWorkerClient`.
- Reassignment is two REST hops (add teamlead, remove behandelaar); idempotent on redelivery — see ADR-0015 consequences.
- Local checks green: domain unit tests (104), acceptance (13), `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 96.69%** (break 90). The `run-domain-check.sh` escalation path is CI-verified on verify-stack (local full-stack run is constrained here).
- `BeoordelingEscalatiePump` excluded from mutation, mirroring the existing `OpenZaakJobPump` exclusion.

Reviewed-on: #99
2026-07-17 09:45:36 +00:00
not a34caba9ea feat(domain): withdrawal cancels the registratie process (S-11b, refs #12) (#89)
CI / build (push) Successful in 57s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m18s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m10s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m38s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m22s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m18s
## What & why

Second sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** (#12). S-11a (#88) made a withdrawal advance the aggregate to INGETROKKEN; this sub-slice **cancels the running Flowable process** so the withdrawn case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak.

- **BPMN** (`registratie.bpmn`): an interrupting message boundary event (`RegistratieIngetrokken`) on the `Beoordelen` task, routing to a dedicated "Registratie ingetrokken" end event.
- **Workflow Client**: `WithdrawBeoordelingAsync(executionId)` delivers `messageEventReceived` to the task's execution (PUT); `BeoordelingTask` now carries its `executionId`.
- **`WithdrawRegistration` handler**: after the domain transition, finds the open `Beoordelen` task for the registration and delivers the withdrawal message — best-effort, mirroring how the beoordeling completes its task.
- **Werkbak**: also filters out registrations that are no longer open, so a withdrawn case never surfaces even in the brief window before cancellation lands.
- **ADR-0014** records the decision (message event in BPMN vs. deleting the instance from code).
- **verify (`run-domain-check.sh`)**: a second registration parks at `Beoordelen`, is withdrawn via the domain, and the check asserts its `Beoordelen` task disappears — so verify-stack validates the live Flowable message correlation.

Refs #12 (S-11c — the BFF + self-service "trek aanvraag in" button + e2e — closes it).

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12).
- [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation (red → green per commit).
- [x] Implementation makes the tests pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` unaffected (BPMN redeploys on a fresh CI DB via flowable-init).
- [x] ADR added (ADR-0014).
- [x] Docs — the user-visible demo note lands with S-11c.

## Notes for reviewers

- Verified locally: `Big.Tests` 94/94 pass; `Big.Api` builds; `registratie.bpmn` is well-formed.
- The Flowable message-correlation REST shape is validated **live** by verify-stack (the Workflow Client unit tests stub the exchange and assert only the request shape, per ADR-0009) — the new `run-domain-check.sh` withdrawal step is that live check.
- Known gap (ADR-0014): a withdrawal that races ahead of the process reaching `Beoordelen` finds no task to cancel; the aggregate is still INGETROKKEN and the werkbak filter hides it, but that instance parks unattended. A process-level event subprocess would close the gap — deferred.

Reviewed-on: #89
2026-07-16 11:09:28 +00:00
not 4085bdead7 feat(#13): S-12b — Workflow Client user-tasks + Beoordelen userTask (#83)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m10s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m23s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m45s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m7s
## What & why

Second sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **Workflow Client gains behandelaar user-task operations**, and the process model gains the beoordeling step.

- **BPMN:** `registratie.bpmn` now parks at a `Beoordelen` **userTask** (candidate group `behandelaar`) after `OpenZaakAanmaken`; `registrationId` rides along as a process variable so the werkbak can correlate each task to its aggregate.
- **Workflow Client** (`IUserTaskClient`, the only code that talks to Flowable §8.2):
  - `GetOpenBeoordelingenAsync()` — the werkbak (open `Beoordelen` tasks + their `registrationId`)
  - `ClaimAsync(taskId, behandelaar)`
  - `CompleteBeoordelingAsync(taskId, besluit)` — carries the decision into the process as the `besluit` variable
- **Live integration:** `verify-domain` now drives the full user-task lifecycle against a real Flowable — after the worker opens the zaak, it polls for the task, claims it as `merel-behandelaar`, completes it (`goedkeuren`), and asserts the process finishes. This proves the exact REST contract (`service/runtime/tasks/query` + `…/{id}` claim/complete) the client depends on.

The walking skeleton is unaffected: the temporary `/approve` path still sets the zaak status directly; wiring the domain decision to *complete this task* (and driving the werkbak from the BFF) lands in **S-12c**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; `refs`, does not close)
- [x] Tests first; red → green
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 76, acceptance 9 (acl/event-subscriber/bff unaffected)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%** (killed the new survivors *and* the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline)
- [x] Live Flowable user-task lifecycle asserted in `verify-domain`
- [ ] CI green (pending)

Part of #13.

Reviewed-on: #83
2026-07-15 08:53:33 +00:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 e9a873c152 test(domain): mutation baseline 90 (achieved 97.7%) + CI/Makefile wiring (refs #6)
Stryker.NET config for the domain service (break 90, the repo's ratchet floor),
excluding the OpenZaakJobPump hosted-shell from mutation. Hardened the unit tests
to kill survivors — Basic-credential value, variable types, null/failure response
paths, option defaults, guard clauses, save counts and log output — leaving only
two documented equivalent mutants (Stryker-disabled). make mutation runs the domain
ratchet and CI uploads its report alongside the others.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:24:56 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 0d34d60797 feat(domain): implement the Flowable Workflow Client and ACL client (refs #6)
FlowableWorkflowClient speaks flowable-rest's REST API (Basic auth): start a
registratie process with the registrationId variable, acquire OpenZaakAanmaken
external-worker jobs and parse their registrationId, complete a job with the
zaakUrl variable — the contract verified against a live engine. AclHttpClient
POSTs the bsn to the ACL and returns the zaak URL. InMemoryRegistrationStore is
a concurrent-dictionary upsert. OpenZaakJobProcessor drains parked jobs, opening
a zaak per job and completing it, leaving failures for redelivery; OpenZaakJobPump
is the hosted polling shell that drives it on an interval (ADR-0009).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:10:21 +02:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8 6d4adaf957 test(domain): Workflow Client, ACL client, store and job processor (refs #6)
Failing infrastructure unit tests (stub HttpMessageHandler, fakes):
- FlowableWorkflowClient starts a process with the registrationId variable and
  returns the instance id; acquires OpenZaakAanmaken jobs (topic/workerId/lock)
  and parses their registrationId; completes a job with the zaakUrl variable —
  request URIs match flowable-rest's service/ and external-job-api/ paths.
- AclHttpClient POSTs the bsn to the ACL and returns the zaak URL.
- InMemoryRegistrationStore saves/reads/upserts by id.
- OpenZaakJobProcessor acquires, opens a zaak, completes the job; leaves a failing
  job uncompleted for redelivery; polls harmlessly when idle.

Adapters are stubs so the tests compile and fail on their assertions; the green
commit implements them against the REST contract verified on a live Flowable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:08:56 +02:00