3afa5a552ae27db4f910ec10d86a3e6228dd7561
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a34caba9ea |
feat(domain): withdrawal cancels the registratie process (S-11b, refs #12) (#89)
All checks were successful
## What & why Second sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** (#12). S-11a (#88) made a withdrawal advance the aggregate to INGETROKKEN; this sub-slice **cancels the running Flowable process** so the withdrawn case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak. - **BPMN** (`registratie.bpmn`): an interrupting message boundary event (`RegistratieIngetrokken`) on the `Beoordelen` task, routing to a dedicated "Registratie ingetrokken" end event. - **Workflow Client**: `WithdrawBeoordelingAsync(executionId)` delivers `messageEventReceived` to the task's execution (PUT); `BeoordelingTask` now carries its `executionId`. - **`WithdrawRegistration` handler**: after the domain transition, finds the open `Beoordelen` task for the registration and delivers the withdrawal message — best-effort, mirroring how the beoordeling completes its task. - **Werkbak**: also filters out registrations that are no longer open, so a withdrawn case never surfaces even in the brief window before cancellation lands. - **ADR-0014** records the decision (message event in BPMN vs. deleting the instance from code). - **verify (`run-domain-check.sh`)**: a second registration parks at `Beoordelen`, is withdrawn via the domain, and the check asserts its `Beoordelen` task disappears — so verify-stack validates the live Flowable message correlation. Refs #12 (S-11c — the BFF + self-service "trek aanvraag in" button + e2e — closes it). ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12). - [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation (red → green per commit). - [x] Implementation makes the tests pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` unaffected (BPMN redeploys on a fresh CI DB via flowable-init). - [x] ADR added (ADR-0014). - [x] Docs — the user-visible demo note lands with S-11c. ## Notes for reviewers - Verified locally: `Big.Tests` 94/94 pass; `Big.Api` builds; `registratie.bpmn` is well-formed. - The Flowable message-correlation REST shape is validated **live** by verify-stack (the Workflow Client unit tests stub the exchange and assert only the request shape, per ADR-0009) — the new `run-domain-check.sh` withdrawal step is that live check. - Known gap (ADR-0014): a withdrawal that races ahead of the process reaching `Beoordelen` finds no task to cancel; the aggregate is still INGETROKKEN and the werkbak filter hides it, but that instance parks unattended. A process-level event subprocess would close the gap — deferred. Reviewed-on: #89 |
|||
| 4085bdead7 |
feat(#13): S-12b — Workflow Client user-tasks + Beoordelen userTask (#83)
All checks were successful
## What & why Second sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **Workflow Client gains behandelaar user-task operations**, and the process model gains the beoordeling step. - **BPMN:** `registratie.bpmn` now parks at a `Beoordelen` **userTask** (candidate group `behandelaar`) after `OpenZaakAanmaken`; `registrationId` rides along as a process variable so the werkbak can correlate each task to its aggregate. - **Workflow Client** (`IUserTaskClient`, the only code that talks to Flowable §8.2): - `GetOpenBeoordelingenAsync()` — the werkbak (open `Beoordelen` tasks + their `registrationId`) - `ClaimAsync(taskId, behandelaar)` - `CompleteBeoordelingAsync(taskId, besluit)` — carries the decision into the process as the `besluit` variable - **Live integration:** `verify-domain` now drives the full user-task lifecycle against a real Flowable — after the worker opens the zaak, it polls for the task, claims it as `merel-behandelaar`, completes it (`goedkeuren`), and asserts the process finishes. This proves the exact REST contract (`service/runtime/tasks/query` + `…/{id}` claim/complete) the client depends on. The walking skeleton is unaffected: the temporary `/approve` path still sets the zaak status directly; wiring the domain decision to *complete this task* (and driving the werkbak from the BFF) lands in **S-12c**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; `refs`, does not close) - [x] Tests first; red → green - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 76, acceptance 9 (acl/event-subscriber/bff unaffected) - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%** (killed the new survivors *and* the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline) - [x] Live Flowable user-task lifecycle asserted in `verify-domain` - [ ] CI green (pending) Part of #13. Reviewed-on: #83 |
|||
| 9997da8beb |
feat(#78): one citizen reference across self-service and the openbaar register (#79)
All checks were successful
## What & why Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**: - **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`. - **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log. - **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference. Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL. Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #78 - [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7 - [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`) - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched) - [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference - [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green) - [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended - [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose closes #78 Reviewed-on: #79 |
|||
| 1c185e6686 |
S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
All checks were successful
## What & why S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar. ## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD) - **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`. - **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test. - **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status. - **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN. - **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note. ## Key decisions (see ADR-0011) - **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant. - **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+). ## Verification - All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean. - No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it). - The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally). closes #75 Reviewed-on: #77 |
|||
| 8d176c2603 |
test(domain): SubmitRegistration + OpenZaakWorker use cases (refs #6)
Failing application-layer tests over fake ports (IWorkflowClient, IAclClient, IRegistrationStore): - Submit persists an INGEDIEND registration and starts the registratie process, recording the instance id — and persists *before* starting, so the worker can correlate the OpenZaakAanmaken job back to its aggregate (ADR-0009). - The worker opens a zaak via the ACL and attaches it; an unknown registration throws (job left for redelivery); a redelivered job is idempotent and opens no second zaak (§8.6). Handlers are stubs (no persistence / no ACL call) so the tests compile and fail on their assertions; the green commit implements them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
