register-referentie/docs/demo-script.md

Demo script

A running log of demoable outcomes, one section per slice. Each entry is a short, copy-pasteable walkthrough against a local make up stack.

---

S-16c — Prometheus metrics + golden-signal Grafana dashboard (#124, ADR-0023)

Outcome: the five .NET services now expose OpenTelemetry metrics in Prometheus format at /metrics — ASP.NET Core + HttpClient instrumentation plus the built-in System.Runtime meter. Prometheus scrapes each service (one job per service), and a pre-built Grafana dashboard — Request path — golden signals — plots the four golden signals: traffic (req/s), errors (5xx/s), latency (p95 request duration), and saturation (CPU cores in use), split by service. It populates under load.

# 1. Automated (a CI verify-stack step): generate BFF traffic and assert Prometheus scraped the
#    golden-signal metric from every service.
make verify-metrics              # → OK — targets up: [...]; request metric scraped from: [...]

# 2. By hand: drive the stack, generate some load, then open the dashboard.
make up
for i in $(seq 1 50); do curl -s localhost:8080/openbaar/register >/dev/null; done   # BFF → projection-api
open http://localhost:3000       # Grafana → Dashboards → "Request path — golden signals"
open http://localhost:9090/targets   # Prometheus → every service target UP

The path: each host adds .WithMetrics(AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation + AddHttpClientInstrumentation + AddMeter("System.Runtime") + AddPrometheusExporter) and maps /metrics; Prometheus scrapes <service>:8080/metrics (config in infra/observability/prometheus/prometheus.yml); Grafana ships the dashboard via provisioning against the fixed prometheus datasource uid. No metrics are pushed over OTLP — Prometheus pulls, so there is no collector hop (ADR-0023).

---

S-16b — distributed traces across the .NET services (#123, ADR-0023)

Outcome: the five .NET services (BFF, Domain, ACL, projection-api, event-subscriber) now emit OpenTelemetry traces — ASP.NET Core + HttpClient auto-instrumentation, exported over OTLP to Tempo. Because every cross-service call goes through a typed HttpClient, the W3C traceparent propagates for free, so a request is one connected trace across the services (bff → domain → acl → openzaak; bff → projection-api). /health is filtered out. No browser-side instrumentation yet, so the trace begins at the BFF; the async Flowable-poll boundary is a separate trace (ADR-0023).

# 1. Automated (a CI verify-stack step): generate BFF traffic and assert Tempo holds one trace
#    spanning multiple services.
make verify-tracing              # → OK — trace <id> spans ['bff', 'projection-api']

# 2. By hand: drive the stack, then explore traces in Grafana.
make up
curl -s localhost:8080/openbaar/register >/dev/null   # BFF → projection-api
open http://localhost:3000       # Grafana → Explore → Tempo → Search → service.name = bff → open a trace

The path: each host wires AddOpenTelemetry().WithTracing(AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation + AddHttpClientInstrumentation + AddOtlpExporter); OTEL_SERVICE_NAME / OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT come from compose; spans export to tempo:4317 and render in Grafana against the provisioned Tempo datasource.

---

S-16a — observability backplane: Tempo + Prometheus + Grafana (#122, ADR-0023)

Outcome: the compose stack now includes a Grafana-native observability backplane — Tempo (OTLP trace ingest on 4317/4318), Prometheus, and Grafana with both datasources auto-provisioned. Nothing is instrumented yet (traces land in S-16b, metrics + dashboards in S-16c); this slice stands the backplane up and proves Grafana can reach both datasources. Config is baked into small built images (infra/observability/) — no collector, no config-volume seeding.

# 1. Bring the stack up, then assert the backplane is live (Grafana healthy + Tempo/Prometheus
#    datasources reachable through Grafana). This is a CI verify-stack step.
make up
make verify-observability        # → ✓ Grafana healthy  ✓ Prometheus reachable  ✓ Tempo reachable

# 2. Or just the backplane, no full stack needed (no external egress):
docker compose -f infra/docker-compose.yml up -d --build tempo prometheus grafana
open http://localhost:3000        # Grafana (admin/admin) → Connections → Data sources: Prometheus + Tempo
open http://localhost:9090        # Prometheus

The path: services will export OTLP → Tempo:4317 and expose /metrics ← Prometheus scrapes; Grafana (:3000) reads both via provisioned datasources with fixed uids tempo / prometheus.

---

S-17 — herregistratie reminder sweep on a Quartz cron (#18, ADR-0022)

Outcome: an inscription (INGESCHREVEN) now carries the moment it was entered in the register, from which its herregistratie deadline is derived (inscription + 5-year validity). A Quartz.NET cron job in the Domain Service sweeps once a day (03:00, overridable via Quartz__Cron): every inscription inside the 90-day window before its deadline is flagged HerregistratieReminderVerstuurd and logged. The sweep is idempotent — a re-fire reminds no one twice — and is a deliberately different mechanism from the queue-draining pumps (Quartz fires time-triggered sweeps; pumps drain Flowable queues, ADR-0022). There is no outbound notification in v1: the reminder is the flag on the aggregate plus a log line.

# 1. The domain unit tests prove the rule and the sweep end to end (rule → store query → sweep):
cd services/domain && dotnet test Big.Tests/Big.Tests.csproj \
  --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Herregistratie|FullyQualifiedName~ReminderSweep"
#    → the reminder is due once the 90-day window opens, not before; a reminded inscription is skipped
#      on the next sweep; the sweep flags + persists every due inscription and returns their ids.

# 2. The read model surfaces the deadline once a registration is approved — the field the sweep acts on:
curl -s localhost:8000/registrations/<id> | jq '{status, herregistratieVoor, herregistratieReminderVerstuurd}'
#    → after approval: herregistratieVoor is inscription + 5 years; the flag flips true once swept.

The path: Registration.Approve(now) stamps IngeschrevenOp → daily Quartz HerregistratieReminderJob → HerregistratieReminderSweep → IRegistrationStore.FindDueForHerregistratieReminderAsync (filtered by the aggregate's own HerregistratieReminderDue rule) → MarkHerregistratieReminderVerstuurd + log.

---

S-B04 — make local completes the whole flow with no manual seeding (#110, ADR-0020)

Outcome: the host-browser stack (make local) now self-seeds at bring-up — it publishes the BIG zaaktype and wires the ACL to it, deploys the diploma-eligibility DMN, and registers the NRC abonnement — so a fresh bring-up runs submit → werkbak → openbaar without the manual seeding the verify-* scripts do for CI. (Previously the process stuck at OpenZaakAanmaken, the werkbak stayed empty, and the openbaar register showed nothing.)

# 1. Fresh bring-up (self-seeding init containers: local-seed, nrc-subscribe; DMN in flowable-init).
make local

# 2. Assert the whole flow works with no manual seeding — submit opens a zaak, documents route it to
#    the werkbak, and the reference appears in the openbaar register:
make verify-local     # → "OK — a fresh local stack completed the flow with no manual seeding ..."

# 3. Or by hand in the browser: log in at http://localhost:8140 (jan-burger / test123), submit +
#    upload a PDF, then approve it in the werkbak at http://localhost:8142 (merel-behandelaar /
#    test123); it shows as INGESCHREVEN in the openbaar register at http://localhost:8141.

The zaaktype is discovered by the ACL itself since S-27 (below); local-seed's acl.env now carries only OpenZaak's IP base URL, which the ACL still needs because OpenZaak rejects a single-label host on zaak-create (ADR-0020 + ADR-0021).

---

S-27 — ACL resolves its zaaktype by identificatie, not a pinned URL (#113, ADR-0021)

Outcome: the ACL discovers its BIG zaaktype (by identificatie) and diploma informatieobjecttype (by omschrijving) from OpenZaak's Catalogi API, instead of being handed the server-assigned URLs. No user-visible behaviour change — the flow runs exactly as before — but no stack captures/injects a zaaktype URL any more, and a missing catalogus now fails with a clear message instead of an opaque 400.

# The live ACL↔OpenZaak integration test proves resolution against a real seeded OpenZaak:
make verify-acl     # → "resolves the published BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype + Diploma informatieobjecttype by business key"

# End-to-end unchanged (the ACL self-discovers the zaaktype during the flow):
make verify-local   # local stack — still green, now with no zaaktype-URL injection
make verify-domain  # CI stack — recreates the ACL pointed only at OpenZaak's IP (no URL to inject)

The ACL still needs its OpenZaak base URL at a URL-valid host (a container IP): OpenZaak's URLValidator rejects a single-label host like openzaak:8000 on zaak-create. So ADR-0020's base-URL injection stays; only the zaaktype/informatieobjecttype URL injection is gone (ADR-0021).

---

S-08d — Walking skeleton complete: browser → submit, end-to-end

Outcome: the self-service portal is served in the stack and the full front-of-house happy path runs in a real browser — mock DigiD login → submit → confirmation — closing the walking skeleton (portal → BFF → domain → Flowable → ACL → OpenZaak, with the openbaar register reading the projection).

# 1. Bring the whole stack up (portal served on :8140, BFF :8080, Keycloak :8180).
make up

# 2. Automated happy path — Playwright, inside the compose network (issuer-consistent):
make verify-e2e          # → login as jan-burger → submit → "ontvangen" confirmation

# 3. By hand: open the portal, log in as jan-burger / test123, click "Registratie indienen".
open http://localhost:8140

The portal is served same-origin with the BFF (nginx proxies /self-service + /openbaar), so no CORS; the OIDC authority comes from /config.json at runtime. See docs/frontend-decisions.md.

---

S-08c — Self-service submit form (NL Design System + DigiD)

Outcome: a zorgprofessional logs in via mock DigiD and submits a BIG registration through the self-service portal (NL Design System styling); the page confirms with the reference returned by the BFF. The bsn comes from the DigiD token, so it's a confirm-and-submit flow (no bsn field).

# 1. Bring the backend + Keycloak up (BFF on :8080, Keycloak on :8180).
make up

# 2. Serve the portal (dev server); it redirects to Keycloak for DigiD login.
pnpm nx serve self-service        # → http://localhost:4200

# 3. In the browser: log in as the mock DigiD user jan-burger / test123, then submit.
#    The page shows the returned registration reference.

First real UI. The full login → submit → success happy path is automated in S-08d (Playwright, against the compose-served app). Component tests + an axe WCAG 2.1 AA check on the submit page run headless in the frontend CI lane. See docs/frontend-decisions.md.

---

S-08a — Nx workspace + self-service portal skeleton

Outcome: the frontend foundation — an Nx (pnpm) monorepo with the self-service Angular app (standalone + signals), lint/test/build green in a CI Node lane. The login + submit form follow in S-08c.

# From a fresh clone (Node 24 + pnpm 11):
pnpm install                       # native builds are pre-approved in pnpm-workspace.yaml
pnpm nx test self-service          # Vitest component test
pnpm nx build self-service         # production build
pnpm nx serve self-service         # → http://localhost:4200  (placeholder page)
# Or the CI-equivalent one-shot:
make frontend                      # install + nx lint/test/build

Nx manages only apps/+libs/; the .NET services stay on dotnet/the Makefile. NL Design System and the real form arrive in S-08c (#67); see docs/frontend-decisions.md.

---

S-07 — BFF: the portals' single backend

Outcome: the BFF validates Keycloak digid tokens on the self-service submit (forwarding the bsn to the domain) and serves the openbaar register anonymously with only public-safe fields — the front door the portals (S-08/S-09) will talk to.

The path: portal → BFF POST /self-service/registrations (token-gated) → domain; and BFF GET /openbaar/register (anonymous) → projection-api. See ADR-0010.

# 1. Bring the full stack up.
make up

# 2. Drive the BFF end-to-end (401 without a token, 202 with a real digid token, anonymous openbaar).
make verify-bff        # → "OK — BFF: 401 without token, 202 with a digid token, anonymous ..."

# 3. Try it by hand (BFF on host port 8080).
#    a) A digid access token for the mock user jan-burger (bsn 123456782):
tok=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8180/realms/digid/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -d grant_type=password -d client_id=big-portal -d username=jan-burger -d password=test123 \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)['access_token'])")

#    b) Submit — without the token it is 401; with it, 202:
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "no token  -> %{http_code}\n" -X POST http://localhost:8080/self-service/registrations
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "with token-> %{http_code}\n" -X POST http://localhost:8080/self-service/registrations \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $tok"

#    c) The openbaar register is anonymous and exposes only id + status (never the bsn):
curl -fsS http://localhost:8080/openbaar/register | jq

The self-service token is validated against Keycloak's digid realm; the openbaar lookup needs no token (S-09). The generated contract lives at services/bff/openapi.json — S-08's client is built from it.

---

S-05 — BIG Domain Service: submit a registration

Outcome: submitting a registration starts a Flowable process; the external-task worker opens a zaak via the ACL and records it on the aggregate — the upstream half of the skeleton that produces the zaak S-06 then projects.

The path: domain POST /registrations → Flowable registratie process → OpenZaakAanmaken worker → ACL → OpenZaak; GET /registrations/{id} shows the opened zaak (ADR-0009).

# 1. Bring the full stack up (seeds config, builds our services, waits for health).
make up

# 2. Drive the full path end-to-end. This also seeds a published BIG zaaktype and points the
#    ACL at it (the zaak's zaaktype URL is server-assigned, so it isn't known at bring-up).
make verify-domain      # → "OK — the domain opened a zaak and recorded it on the registration"

# 3. Submit one yourself (domain on host port 8130). Returns 202 + a Location to read back.
loc=$(curl -fsS -D - -o /dev/null -X POST http://localhost:8130/registrations \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"bsn":"123456782"}' | sed -n 's/\r$//; s/^[Ll]ocation: //p')

# 4. The worker opens the zaak off the request path (eventual consistency, ADR-0009); poll
#    until zaakUrl is filled. (Step 2 must have run first, so the ACL knows the zaaktype.)
curl -fsS "http://localhost:8130$loc" | jq
# → { "registrationId": "...", "status": "Ingediend", "zaakUrl": "http://.../zaken/api/v1/zaken/<uuid>" }

Registration state is in-memory for this slice (ADR-0009); the rebuildable read model is the projection (S-06), fed by the very zaak this flow opens.

---

S-06 — Event Subscriber + read projection

Outcome: a zaak created in OpenZaak flows through NRC to the Event Subscriber, which projects it into a rebuildable read projection the projection-api serves.

The path: OpenZaak → (notification) NRC → (abonnement callback) Event Subscriber → register_projection → projection-api GET /register.

# 1. Bring the full stack up (seeds config, builds our services, waits for health).
make up

# 2. Register the Event Subscriber's abonnement and create a zaak, then read it back.
#    (The verify-projection check does exactly this end-to-end and asserts the result.)
make verify-projection            # → "OK — projection-api serves zaak <uuid> with status INGEDIEND"

# 3. Observe the projection directly via the read API (host port 8120).
curl -fsS http://localhost:8120/register | jq
# → [ { "id": "<zaak-uuid>", "status": "INGEDIEND", "bsn": null, "naamPlaceholder": null } ]

# 4. Idempotency + rebuild: replays don't duplicate; a rebuild repopulates from the
#    notification log (no OpenZaak access needed — ADR-0008).
curl -fsS -X POST http://localhost:8110/admin/rebuild   # Event Subscriber, host port 8110
curl -fsS http://localhost:8120/register | jq 'length'  # → unchanged

bsn / naam_placeholder are deferred (ADR-0008) — the notification doesn't carry them and the subscriber may not read OpenZaak directly (§8.1). They surface in a later slice.

---

S-09 — Openbaar Register portal (public visibility)

Outcome: the entry a zorgprofessional submits via self-service becomes publicly visible in the anonymous openbaar register portal — closing the walking-skeleton loop (submit → process → projection → public visibility).

The path: self-service submit → BFF → domain → (zaak) OpenZaak → NRC → Event Subscriber → projection → openbaar portal reads the BFF's public-safe GET /openbaar/register.

# 1. Bring the full stack up (self-service :8140, openbaar :8141).
make up

# 2. Submit a registration via the self-service portal (mock DigiD: jan-burger / test123),
#    or drive the whole happy path automatically (login → submit → public visibility):
make verify-e2e

# 3. Open the public register — no login. It lists the submitted entry (id + status only).
#    Only public-safe fields cross the BFF: bsn / naam never appear.
open http://localhost:8141/            # search box; searches the BFF by referentie
curl -fsS http://localhost:8140/openbaar/register | jq   # same public-safe view via the BFF proxy
# → [ { "id": "<zaak-uuid>", "status": "INGEDIEND" } ]

The register shows INGEDIEND on submit; approval flips it to INGESCHREVEN — see S-09b below.

---

S-09b — Approval flow (public visibility flips to INGESCHREVEN)

Outcome: a behandelaar approves a submitted registration via a temporary admin endpoint (no behandel-portal yet — S-12). The approval sets the zaak's final status through the ACL, which flows back to the projection over NRC, and the openbaar register then shows the entry as INGESCHREVEN.

The path: POST /registrations/{id}/approve (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW /statussen) → OpenZaak → NRC → Event Subscriber projects INGESCHREVEN → openbaar register.

# 1. Full stack up, then drive submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN:
make up
make verify-e2e

# 2. Or by hand: submit (as in S-09), note the reference, then approve it.
#    The zaak is opened off the request path, so approve once GET shows a zaakUrl.
ref="<registration-reference-from-the-confirmation>"
curl -fsS http://localhost:8130/registrations/$ref | jq       # domain (host port 8130): wait for .zaakUrl
curl -fsS -X POST http://localhost:8130/registrations/$ref/approve -i   # → 204 No Content

# 3. The public register now shows the entry as approved.
curl -fsS http://localhost:8140/openbaar/register | jq
# → [ { "id": "<zaak-uuid>", "status": "INGESCHREVEN" } ]

End of walking skeleton (S-09 + S-09b): submit → process → projection → public visibility, from INGEDIEND through approval to INGESCHREVEN. The subscriber takes any post-creation status-set as the approval (ADR-0011) — a walking-skeleton assumption that tightens when more transitions arrive (S-12+).

#78 — One reference across both portals (ADR-0012)

Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed different identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up. Now both show the same reference: the domain registrationId is set as the zaak's identificatie by the ACL, and the Event Subscriber enriches the projection with it by reading the zaak through the ACL (§8.1) — storing it in the replay log so rebuild stays log-only (ADR-0008).

The path: domain passes registrationId → ACL sets it as zaak.identificatie → NRC → Event Subscriber asks the ACL for the reference → projection row + replay log → openbaar register.

# Submit as in S-09 and note the reference on the confirmation, then find it in the public register:
ref="<registration-reference-from-the-confirmation>"
curl -fsS "http://localhost:8140/openbaar/register?q=$ref" | jq
# → [ { "id": "<zaak-uuid>", "status": "INGEDIEND", "reference": "<same-ref-as-confirmation>" } ]

The openbaar register's "Referentie" column and its search now use this reference — the exact value the citizen saw on submit. Asserted end-to-end by the Playwright happy path.

S-12 — Behandel portal: werkbak + beoordeling (#13, ADR-0013)

A behandelaar now works submitted registrations in a real portal instead of the temporary admin endpoint. After a citizen submits (as above), the workflow parks the registration at the Flowable Beoordelen user task, and it shows up in the werkbak. The behandelaar logs in against the Keycloak medewerker realm and decides — goedkeuren (→ INGESCHREVEN via the ACL, per ADR-0011) or afwijzen — which also completes the Beoordelen task so the process advances.

# 1. Open the behandel portal and log in as a behandelaar (medewerker realm):
#    http://localhost:8142/   →  merel-behandelaar / test123
#
# 2. The werkbak lists the registrations awaiting beoordeling (referentie / bsn / status).
#    Find the reference from the submit confirmation and click "Goedkeuren" on that row.
#
# 3. The row drops off the werkbak (its Beoordelen task is completed) and the openbaar register
#    (http://localhost:8141/) now shows that reference as INGESCHREVEN.

The path: behandel portal → BFF POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide (behandelaar policy, medewerker realm) → domain applies the decision + completes the Flowable Beoordelen task → ACL → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar register shows INGESCHREVEN.

The full round-trip — DigiD submit → public INGEDIEND → behandelaar goedkeurt in the werkbak → public INGESCHREVEN — is the Playwright happy path (tests/e2e/registration.spec.ts), which now drives the behandel portal in place of the old admin endpoint.

S-11 — Withdrawal: "trek aanvraag in" (#12, ADR-0014)

A zorgprofessional can withdraw their own still-open registration from the self-service portal. The withdrawal is owner-scoped (the BFF forwards the DigiD token's bsn; the domain only lets the owner withdraw) and cancels the running workflow via a BPMN message event, so the case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak.

# 1. Log in and submit at the self-service portal (http://localhost:8140/, jan-burger / test123),
#    note the "Referentie" on the confirmation.
# 2. Click "Trek aanvraag in" → the page confirms the registration is ingetrokken.
# 3. In the behandel werkbak (http://localhost:8142/, merel-behandelaar) the registration no longer
#    appears — its Beoordelen task was cancelled.

The path: self-service → BFF POST /self-service/registrations/{id}/withdraw (DigiD, owner-scoped) → domain sets INGETROKKEN + correlates the RegistratieIngetrokken message to the process → the interrupting boundary event ends it → the werkbak drops the case.

DigiD submit → trek aanvraag in → ingetrokken is the Playwright happy path (tests/e2e/withdrawal.spec.ts); the owner-scoping + workflow cancellation are covered by the Een registratie intrekken acceptance scenarios and the domain live check.

S-14 — Beoordeling escalation: 14 days unclaimed → teamlead (#15, ADR-0015)

A beoordeling a behandelaar does not pick up within 14 days escalates to the teamlead. A non-interrupting boundary timer on the Beoordelen task fires a BeoordelingEscaleren external task; the domain's escalation worker reassigns the still-open task's candidate group from behandelaar to teamlead, so it moves from the behandelaar werkbak into the teamlead's. The Beoordelen task keeps its identity throughout — only who may claim it changes.

The timer is 14 days, so the demo fires it early through Flowable's management API (exactly what the verify-domain check automates):

# 1. Submit at the self-service portal (http://localhost:8140/, jan-burger / test123). The case
#    parks at Beoordelen, visible in the behandelaar werkbak (http://localhost:8142/, merel-behandelaar)
#    but NOT claimed.
#
# 2. Find the parked instance and its Beoordelen task, then fire the boundary timer early:
FL=http://localhost:8090/flowable-rest/service
PID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"processDefinitionKey":"registratie","taskDefinitionKey":"Beoordelen"}' \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["processInstanceId"])')
TID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"processDefinitionKey":"registratie","taskDefinitionKey":"Beoordelen"}' \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
TJ=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test "$FL/management/timer-jobs?processInstanceId=$PID" \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/management/timer-jobs/$TJ" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"action":"move"}'
AJ=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test "$FL/management/jobs?processInstanceId=$PID" \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/management/jobs/$AJ" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"action":"execute"}'
#
# 3. Within a couple of poll cycles the task's candidate group flips to teamlead:
curl -s -u rest-admin:test "$FL/runtime/tasks/$TID/identitylinks"   # → [{"group":"teamlead","type":"candidate"}]

The path: BPMN non-interrupting P14D boundary timer on Beoordelen → BeoordelingEscaleren external task → domain escalation worker (BeoordelingEscalatiePump) → Workflow Client swaps the task's candidate group behandelaar → teamlead (§8.2).

Both branches (escalate after 14 days; no-op when completed in time) are covered by the Een beoordeling escaleren acceptance scenarios and the Workflow Client unit tests; the timer firing and reassignment are asserted live by the verify-domain check.

S-13 — Diploma-eligibility: foreign diplomas route through CBGV-advies (#14, ADR-0016)

A registration's diploma origin decides its route. A DMN service task in the registratie process evaluates the diploma-eligibility decision on the diplomaOrigin start variable: a foreign (Buitenlands) diploma is routed through an extra CBGV-advies user task before beoordeling; a domestic (Binnenlands) one goes straight to beoordeling. The decision lives in the DMN, not in code — a beheerder can read and adjust the decision table directly.

The self-service portal's eIDAS→foreign wiring is a later slice; for now the origin is submitted to the domain directly, so the demo drives it through the domain endpoint:

# 1. Submit a foreign-diploma registration to the domain (note the returned Location/reference):
DOM=http://localhost:8080   # domain service
curl -s -i -X POST "$DOM/registrations" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"bsn":"123456782","diplomaOrigin":"Buitenlands"}' | grep -i '^location:'
#
# 2. Once the zaak is opened, the process first parks at WachtOpDocumenten (S-10a); complete that task
#    (documents received) — then it parks at the CBGV-advies task (NOT Beoordelen). In Flowable:
FL=http://localhost:8090/flowable-rest/service
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"processDefinitionKey":"registratie","taskDefinitionKey":"CBGVAdvies"}' | python3 -m json.tool
#
# 3. Complete the CBGV-advies task; the case then advances to the regular Beoordelen task:
TID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"processDefinitionKey":"registratie","taskDefinitionKey":"CBGVAdvies"}' \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/runtime/tasks/$TID" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"action":"complete"}'
# A domestic submission (default, or "Binnenlands") skips CBGV-advies and parks straight at Beoordelen.

The path: domain sets the diplomaOrigin start variable → registratie process DMN DMN service task sets route → exclusive gateway → foreign: CBGVAdvies user task → Beoordelen; domestic: Beoordelen directly (§8.2, ADR-0016).

The domestic/foreign paths are covered by the Een diploma op herkomst routeren acceptance scenarios and unit tests (the origin is carried into the process); the DMN decision and the foreign→CBGV routing are asserted live by the verify-domain check.

S-10a — Document wait + 30-day timeout cancels the registration (#102, ADR-0017)

After the zaak is opened the registratie process parks at a WachtOpDocumenten user task, waiting for the citizen's documents (their diploma). Two things can happen:

• Documents arrive in time → the task completes and the process continues to the diploma-eligibility routing (S-13) → beoordeling.
• 30 days pass with no documents → an interrupting P30D boundary timer cancels the wait, runs the RegistratieVerlopen external task, and the domain expires the registration to the terminal status VERLOPEN (the case is cancelled).

The "documents received" trigger is wired end-to-end in S-10a: the self-service page shows a "Documenten aanleveren" button after submit (portal → BFF → domain → completes the wait). S-10b turns that into a real file upload stored in the ZGW Documenten API via the ACL. The timeout branch is demonstrated by firing the 30-day timer early via the management API.

DOM=http://localhost:8080                      # domain service
FL=http://localhost:8090/flowable-rest/service # flowable-rest

# 1. Submit a registration; once the zaak is opened it parks at WachtOpDocumenten:
curl -s -i -X POST "$DOM/registrations" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"bsn":"123456782"}' | grep -i '^location:'          # note the /registrations/<id> reference
WQ='{"processDefinitionKey":"registratie","taskDefinitionKey":"WachtOpDocumenten"}'

# 2a. Documents-in-time: complete the WachtOpDocumenten task → the process advances to beoordeling.
TID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "$WQ" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/runtime/tasks/$TID" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"action":"complete"}'

# 2b. Timeout: instead of completing it, fire the 30-day timer early via the management API. Find the
#     instance's timer job, "move" it to executable; the async executor fires the interrupting event.
PID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/query/tasks" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "$WQ" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["processInstanceId"])')
JID=$(curl -s -u rest-admin:test "$FL/management/timer-jobs?processInstanceId=$PID" \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"][0]["id"])')
curl -s -u rest-admin:test -X POST "$FL/management/timer-jobs/$JID" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"action":"move"}'
#     The RegistratieVerlopen worker then expires the aggregate — read it back as VERLOPEN:
curl -s "$DOM/registrations/<id>"   # → {"status":"Verlopen", ...}

The path: registratie process parks at WachtOpDocumenten → documents received completes it (→ routing → Beoordelen), OR the P30D interrupting timer fires → RegistratieVerlopen external task → domain worker expires the aggregate to Verlopen → endVerlopen (§8.2, ADR-0017).

Both branches are covered by the Een documenttermijn laten verlopen acceptance scenarios (worker + aggregate) and unit tests; the wait completion and the 30-day timer firing are asserted live by the verify-domain check.

S-10b — Diploma upload stored in the ZGW Documenten API (#103, ADR-0018)

The self-service "Documenten aanleveren" action (S-10a) is now a real file upload: after submitting, the citizen picks a PDF and uploads it. The portal base64-encodes the file client-side and posts it to the BFF; the BFF forwards it to the domain, which stores it via the ACL as a ZGW enkelvoudiginformatieobject in the Documenten (DRC) API and relates it to the zaak — then completes the WachtOpDocumenten wait so beoordeling can proceed. Per §8.1 only the ACL talks to ZGW.

make up
# 1. Log in as jan-burger / test123, submit, then — once the openbaar register shows the row —
#    choose a PDF under "Documenten aanleveren" and upload it. The page confirms "aangeleverd".
open http://localhost:8140
#
# 2. Automated: the walking-skeleton e2e now uploads a real PDF before the behandelaar approves.
make verify-e2e
#
# 3. The ACL integration test proves the document is really created in the Documenten API and
#    related to the zaak (against a live OpenZaak):
make verify-acl        # → "Storing a diploma creates a real informatieobject related to the zaak"

The path: portal (base64) → BFF POST /self-service/registrations/{id}/documents → domain ProvideDocuments → ACL POST /documenten → ZGW enkelvoudiginformatieobjecten + zaakinformatieobjecten; the wait is then completed and the case advances to Beoordelen (§8.1, ADR-0018).

S-10c — the ZGW zaak is cancelled when the document term lapses (#106)

When the 30-day document term lapses (S-10a), the domain no longer only marks the aggregate Verlopen — it now also cancels the ZGW zaak through the ACL, so OpenZaak and the register agree. The zaak is set to a distinct, non-terminal Geannuleerd status with a Vervallen resultaat (as opposed to the approval Afgehandeld + Geregistreerd), resolved by name in the ACL (§8.1, ADR-0019).

# 1. The ACL integration test proves cancellation records the Geannuleerd status + a resultaat
#    against a live OpenZaak:
make verify-acl        # → "Cancelling a zaak records the geannuleerd status and a resultaat"
#
# 2. End-to-end: the domain check submits a registration, fires its 30-day timer early, and asserts
#    the timeout worker both expires the registration (VERLOPEN) and cancels its zaak (Geannuleerd):
make verify-domain     # → "the timed-out registration's zaak was cancelled to Geannuleerd in OpenZaak"

The path: Flowable P30D timer → RegistratieVerlopen job → domain ExpireRegistrationWorker → ACL POST /annuleringen → ZGW resultaten + statussen (Geannuleerd); the aggregate then moves to Verlopen. The ACL cancels the zaak before the aggregate is expired, so a failed ZGW call leaves the job for redelivery rather than diverging the two (ADR-0019).