OpenZaakWorker forwards registration.Id to IAclClient.OpenZaakAsync so the zaak's
identificatie equals the reference the citizen sees on the submit confirmation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## What & why
S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.
## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)
- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.
## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)
- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).
## Verification
- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).
closes#75
Reviewed-on: #77
Failing infrastructure unit tests (stub HttpMessageHandler, fakes):
- FlowableWorkflowClient starts a process with the registrationId variable and
returns the instance id; acquires OpenZaakAanmaken jobs (topic/workerId/lock)
and parses their registrationId; completes a job with the zaakUrl variable —
request URIs match flowable-rest's service/ and external-job-api/ paths.
- AclHttpClient POSTs the bsn to the ACL and returns the zaak URL.
- InMemoryRegistrationStore saves/reads/upserts by id.
- OpenZaakJobProcessor acquires, opens a zaak, completes the job; leaves a failing
job uncompleted for redelivery; polls harmlessly when idle.
Adapters are stubs so the tests compile and fail on their assertions; the green
commit implements them against the REST contract verified on a live Flowable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing application-layer tests over fake ports (IWorkflowClient, IAclClient,
IRegistrationStore):
- Submit persists an INGEDIEND registration and starts the registratie process,
recording the instance id — and persists *before* starting, so the worker can
correlate the OpenZaakAanmaken job back to its aggregate (ADR-0009).
- The worker opens a zaak via the ACL and attaches it; an unknown registration
throws (job left for redelivery); a redelivered job is idempotent and opens no
second zaak (§8.6).
Handlers are stubs (no persistence / no ACL call) so the tests compile and fail
on their assertions; the green commit implements them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
