Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7bcbc726ce feat(workflow): beoordeling escalation to teamlead after 14 days (S-14, closes #15) (#99)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 56s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m11s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m30s
## What & why

S-14: a beoordeling a behandelaar does not pick up within **14 days** escalates to the **teamlead**.

A non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on the `Beoordelen` user task fires an external-worker task
(`BeoordelingEscaleren`); the domain's escalation worker reassigns the still-open task's candidate group
from `behandelaar` to `teamlead`. The task keeps its identity — only who may claim it changes. The
escalation-via-external-worker decision is recorded in **ADR-0015** (proposal #98); it upholds §8.2
(the Workflow Client stays the only code that talks to Flowable) and keeps Flowable a stock image.

Closes #15

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #NN`).
- [x] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (no new services; escalation is additive to the domain worker).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0015, demo note).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0015-beoordeling-escalation.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## How it was built (TDD)

- **Workflow Client** (`IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`): acquire `BeoordelingEscaleren` jobs → find the open `Beoordelen` task in the instance → add `teamlead`/remove `behandelaar` candidate group → complete the job. Red → green.
- **Escalation drain loop** (`BeoordelingEscalatieProcessor`) + hosted `BeoordelingEscalatiePump`, mirroring the OpenZaak worker. Red → green.
- **BPMN**: non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on `Beoordelen` → external task → escalation end.
- **Both branches** (escalate after timeout; no-op when completed in time) covered by the `Een beoordeling escaleren` acceptance scenarios + Workflow Client unit tests.
- **Live integration**: `verify-domain` fires the timer early via Flowable's management API and asserts the reassignment to teamlead.

## Notes for reviewers

- Interface segregation: escalation is on `IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`, separate from the OpenZaak worker's `IExternalWorkerClient`.
- Reassignment is two REST hops (add teamlead, remove behandelaar); idempotent on redelivery — see ADR-0015 consequences.
- Local checks green: domain unit tests (104), acceptance (13), `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 96.69%** (break 90). The `run-domain-check.sh` escalation path is CI-verified on verify-stack (local full-stack run is constrained here).
- `BeoordelingEscalatiePump` excluded from mutation, mirroring the existing `OpenZaakJobPump` exclusion.

Reviewed-on: #99
2026-07-17 09:45:36 +00:00
5d32d4f15e test(bff): acceptance scenario for BFF access (valid/invalid tokens) (refs #8)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) driving the real BFF over HTTP with fake downstreams
and locally-minted tokens: a valid DigiD token is accepted and the bsn forwarded
to the domain; a tokenless submit is 401; the openbaar register is anonymous and
never exposes the bsn (ADR-0010). Real Keycloak validation is the verify-bff check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:03:37 +02:00
79dcd8f14b test(domain): acceptance scenario for submitting a registration (refs #6)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) for S-05: a zorgprofessional submits a registration;
the Domain Service starts the registratie process and the OpenZaakAanmaken external
task opens a zaak via the ACL, recorded on the aggregate (ADR-0009). Driven against
in-memory Workflow Client and ACL stand-ins; real Flowable+ACL+OpenZaak delivery is
the live-stack verify-domain check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:15:23 +02:00
c70840e5b7 test(event-subscriber): project zaak-created notifications into the read projection (refs #7)
Failing unit + acceptance tests for the Event Subscriber's NotificationProjector:
a zaken/zaak/create notification yields one INGEDIEND projection row, duplicate
deliveries collapse to one row, non-zaak/non-create notifications are ignored, and
a rebuild repopulates the projection from the durable notification log (PRD §8.4).

The projector is a no-op stub so the tests compile and fail on the assertions; the
implementation follows in the green commit. The notification log doubles as the
idempotency guard and rebuild source so a rebuild needs no OpenZaak access (§8.1).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 14:47:16 +02:00
28041228bd test(acl): BDD acceptance scenario for opening a zaak (closes #5) (#49)
Some checks failed
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / unit (push) Has been cancelled
CI / compose-smoke (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-08 11:25:26 +00:00