1 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
not	6cfcc4cf83	ci(deploy): deploy the stack to Talos on merge to main (closes #175) (#176) ... ## What & why The chart has been deployable by hand since #25 and linted in CI since #168. This makes a merged PR actually ship it to the Talos VM on the lab server. `.gitea/workflows/deploy.yaml` runs on a push to `main` (a squash-merged PR) and on manual dispatch: 1. **Tunnel** — neither the Kubernetes API nor the in-cluster registry is publicly reachable, so 6443, 30500 and 30141 are forwarded over the same SSH hop into the Fedora host that the Gitea-runner pipeline uses (`ssh -p 6667 user@labs.respellion.tech`). 2. **Images** — `make k8s-images K8S_REGISTRY=localhost:30500`, pushed *through* the tunnel. 3. **Deploy** — `make k8s-reseed TALOS_HOST=… K8S_REGISTRY=<vm-ip>:30500`, pulled by the node from its own NodePort. 4. **Roll** — `rollout restart` + `rollout status` on the nine repo deployments. 5. **Smoke** — `GET /openbaar/register` through the openbaar portal. Three decisions worth the review: - **One registry, two names.** The push target (`localhost:30500`, the tunnel) and the pull target (`<vm-ip>:30500`, the node's own NodePort) address the same store. The pull name has to be the one in the node's registry-mirror patch, which is what makes plain HTTP acceptable. - **`k8s-reseed`, not `k8s-up`.** A Job's pod template is immutable, so a chart change to any bootstrap Job would otherwise fail the upgrade with `cannot patch … with kind Job`. The Jobs are idempotent by design, so re-running them every deploy is safe and removes that whole class of failure. Cost: a few minutes per deploy, and `seed-zaaktype` needs egress from the VM. - **No re-run of the checks.** PR CI is the merge gate, so `main` is green by construction. Deploys **queue** (`cancel-in-progress: false`) — a `helm upgrade` killed half-way leaves the release in `pending-upgrade` and has to be unwedged by hand. Settings on the repo (already added): secrets `TALOS_SSH_KEY` and `TALOS_KUBECONFIG` (base64, and its `server:` must be `https://127.0.0.1:6443` — Talos puts `127.0.0.1` in the apiserver cert SANs, so TLS still verifies through the tunnel); variables `TALOS_VM_IP` (default `192.168.122.173`) and `TALOS_HOST` (default `localhost`). Closes #175 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [ ] Failing test committed before the implementation — **n/a**: this is a deployment workflow with no unit under test. Its check is the run itself: `rollout status` and the public-register smoke both have to pass or the job fails. `make k8s-lint` / `make k8s-drift` (#168) already gate the chart it deploys. - [x] Implementation — one workflow file, no production code touched. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #175`). - [ ] CI green — awaiting the run on this PR. - [x] `docker compose up` unaffected — no service, image or compose file is touched. - [x] Docs updated — `docs/runbooks/kubernetes-talos.md` §9 (the tunnel, the two registry names, the secrets table, the smoke) and a pointer from `docs/runbooks/ci.md`. - [x] No ADR needed: no new dependency (kubectl/helm/crane are already prerequisites of the `k8s-*` targets), no service boundary moved, no CLAUDE.md §8 rule bent. - [ ] Demo note — not user-visible. ## Notes for reviewers - **The first deploy is the real test.** It cannot be dry-run: the tunnel, the secrets and the registry only exist on the lab server. Merging is how we find out; `Pods on failure` dumps `get pods,jobs` if it doesn't. - **Known gap — the portals still aren't browsable.** PKCE needs a secure context, so a NodePort on an IP can't serve them (runbook §5); they need `make k8s-portals` or an SSH forward. Giving the server a hostname + TLS is the follow-up, and is where `TALOS_HOST` stops defaulting to `localhost`. - **Databases are `emptyDir`.** Any change to a database pod's template wipes it; the `k8s-reseed` in the deploy re-runs the bootstrap, so the stack recovers, but submitted registrations do not. Persistence is runbook §6. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #176	2026-09-18 13:53:58 +00:00