fix/91-local-compose-parity
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2397d9196a |
feat(bff): owner-scoped self-service withdraw endpoint (S-11c-1, refs #12) (#90)
## What & why Third sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** (#12) — the **owner-scoped BFF withdraw endpoint** (backend). S-11a/b made a withdrawal transition the aggregate and cancel the workflow; this adds the citizen-facing entry point through the BFF, gated to the registration's owner. - **Domain**: `WithdrawRegistrationCommand` carries the caller's `bsn`; the handler returns a `WithdrawOutcome` and refuses a bsn that doesn't own the registration. Unknown and not-owned are **both 404** (indistinguishable — ownership isn't revealed). `POST /registrations/{id}/withdraw` takes `{bsn}` and maps the outcome (204/404). - **BFF**: `POST /self-service/registrations/{id}/withdraw` (DigiD-authenticated) forwards the token's `bsn` to the domain and relays 204/404. The BFF authenticates; the domain owner-scopes (an aggregate invariant, not the domain doing auth). - OpenAPI spec + Angular client regenerated for the new endpoint. - `run-domain-check.sh` withdrawal step now sends the owner `bsn` (verify-stack). Refs #12 — the self-service "trek aanvraag in" button + e2e (S-11c-2) closes it. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12). - [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation. - [x] Implementation makes the tests pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` unaffected. - [x] No ADR needed (owner-scoping is an aggregate invariant; no boundary change). - [x] Docs — the user-visible demo note lands with S-11c-2. ## Notes for reviewers - **Full local gate run before pushing this time** (lessons from #89): `dotnet format --verify-no-changes` clean; `make unit` green — Acl 27, EventSubscriber 19, BFF 30, Acceptance 9, Big 95; `api-client` lint+test green. - Owner mismatch returns 404 (not 403) so the portal can't be used to probe which references exist. Reviewed-on: #90 |
|||
| 1f1c944a8b |
feat(domain): withdrawal — INGETROKKEN transition + endpoint (S-11a, refs #12) (#88)
All checks were successful
## What & why First sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** (#12). A zorgprofessional can withdraw a still-open registration ("trek aanvraag in"); this sub-slice delivers the **domain transition + endpoint**, mirroring how S-12a shipped the beoordeling decision model on its own (#82). - `RegistrationStatus.Ingetrokken` (terminal). - `Registration.Withdraw()` — allowed from INGEDIEND or IN_BEHANDELING, needs no zaak, idempotent, and rejected once the registration has been decided (INGESCHREVEN/AFGEWEZEN). - `WithdrawRegistration` application handler (load → withdraw → persist; repeated withdrawal is a no-op). - `POST /registrations/{id}/withdraw` on the domain API. Demoable: `POST /registrations/{id}/withdraw` → `GET /registrations/{id}` shows `INGETROKKEN`. Refs #12 (not closing — see below). ## Scope / follow-ups S-11 is bigger than one slice, so it is split (CLAUDE.md §13), like S-12 was: - **S-11a (this PR)** — domain withdrawal transition + endpoint. - **S-11b** — cancel the running Flowable process via a BPMN message event, so a withdrawn case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak. - **S-11c** — owner-scoped BFF self-service withdraw endpoint + "trek aanvraag in" button + e2e. Cancelling the Flowable process is deliberately deferred (documented in `WithdrawRegistration`), exactly as the beoordeling's rejection deferred its zaak propagation. #12 stays open until S-11c. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation. - [x] Implementation makes the test pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` unaffected (no infra/contract change). - [x] Docs — none needed for this backend sub-slice; the user-visible demo note lands with S-11c. - [x] No ADR needed — mirrors existing aggregate/handler/endpoint patterns; no boundary change. ## Notes for reviewers - Verified locally: `Big.Tests` 89/89 pass; `Big.Api` builds clean. - The domain trusts its callers (§8.3); owner-scoping by the caller's bsn is enforced at the BFF in S-11c. Reviewed-on: #88 |
|||
| 9c3da48d8e |
feat(#13): S-12c-1 — behandel BFF auth + werkbak (ADR-0013) (#85)
All checks were successful
## What & why First half of **S-12c** (behandel-portal backend), per **ADR-0013** (decisions recorded in #84): - **BFF multi-realm auth.** A second JWT bearer scheme (`medewerker`) alongside the default `digid` scheme. On validation it lifts Keycloak's `realm_access.roles` onto the principal, and a `behandelaar` policy (medewerker scheme + `behandelaar` role) gates `/behandel/*`. Self-service keeps the digid scheme. - **Werkbak = Flowable tasks.** The domain `Werkbak` query reads the open `Beoordelen` tasks (§8.2, S-12b's `IUserTaskClient`) and enriches each with its aggregate's bsn + status; `GET /behandel/werkbak` (domain) is proxied by the BFF `GET /behandel/werkbak` behind the behandelaar policy. The read projection stays the anonymous openbaar model (no premature `IN_BEHANDELING`/personal-data plumbing — deferred in ADR-0008). Behavior: `/behandel/werkbak` is **401** without a token, **403** for a medewerker lacking the role, **200 + werkbak** for a behandelaar. **S-12c-2** (next): `POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide` → domain decision + complete the Flowable task. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella, `refs`); closes the adr-proposal #84 - [x] Tests first; red → green per layer - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 78, bff 23, acceptance 9 (+ acl/event-subscriber unaffected) - [x] api-client `test` green; openapi.json regenerated (drift guard passes) - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%, bff 100%** - [x] ADR-0013 added; `Keycloak__MedewerkerAuthority` wired into compose - [ ] CI green (pending) Part of #13. closes #84 Reviewed-on: #85 |
|||
| 4085bdead7 |
feat(#13): S-12b — Workflow Client user-tasks + Beoordelen userTask (#83)
All checks were successful
## What & why Second sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **Workflow Client gains behandelaar user-task operations**, and the process model gains the beoordeling step. - **BPMN:** `registratie.bpmn` now parks at a `Beoordelen` **userTask** (candidate group `behandelaar`) after `OpenZaakAanmaken`; `registrationId` rides along as a process variable so the werkbak can correlate each task to its aggregate. - **Workflow Client** (`IUserTaskClient`, the only code that talks to Flowable §8.2): - `GetOpenBeoordelingenAsync()` — the werkbak (open `Beoordelen` tasks + their `registrationId`) - `ClaimAsync(taskId, behandelaar)` - `CompleteBeoordelingAsync(taskId, besluit)` — carries the decision into the process as the `besluit` variable - **Live integration:** `verify-domain` now drives the full user-task lifecycle against a real Flowable — after the worker opens the zaak, it polls for the task, claims it as `merel-behandelaar`, completes it (`goedkeuren`), and asserts the process finishes. This proves the exact REST contract (`service/runtime/tasks/query` + `…/{id}` claim/complete) the client depends on. The walking skeleton is unaffected: the temporary `/approve` path still sets the zaak status directly; wiring the domain decision to *complete this task* (and driving the werkbak from the BFF) lands in **S-12c**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; `refs`, does not close) - [x] Tests first; red → green - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 76, acceptance 9 (acl/event-subscriber/bff unaffected) - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%** (killed the new survivors *and* the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline) - [x] Live Flowable user-task lifecycle asserted in `verify-domain` - [ ] CI green (pending) Part of #13. Reviewed-on: #83 |
|||
| d4ed0ffc22 |
feat(#13): S-12a — beoordeling decision model (domain) (#82)
All checks were successful
## What & why First sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **beoordeling decision model** in the Domain Service. Foundation for the behandel-portal: it gives the domain a proper decision lifecycle before any UI/Flowable/BFF work. - **Statuses:** add `InBehandeling` and `Afgewezen` to `RegistrationStatus`. - **Aggregate:** `TakeIntoBehandeling()` (`Ingediend → InBehandeling`, idempotent, guards terminal states); generalise the behandelaar decision — `Approve()` (requires a zaak) and new `Reject()` both act on an `Ingediend`/`InBehandeling` registration → `Ingeschreven`/`Afgewezen`. - **Use-case:** `BeoordeelRegistratie` (`goedkeuren` sets the zaak's final status via the ACL §8.1 → `Ingeschreven`; `afwijzen` → `Afgewezen`, domain-only for now). Idempotent. - **Endpoint:** `POST /registrations/{id}/decide` (`{ "besluit": "goedkeuren" | "afwijzen" }`), superseding the temporary `/approve` (retired when the portal lands, S-12d). - **BDD:** `EenRegistratieBeoordelen.feature` — goedkeuren + afwijzen scenarios (feature-scoped bindings). **Scoped out** to later S-12 sub-slices: Flowable user-task claim/complete + BPMN `userTask` (S-12b), BFF `/behandel/*` + medewerker authz (S-12c), the Angular behandel-portal + e2e (S-12d), and propagating a *rejection* to the zaak/projection via the ACL. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; this PR `refs`, does not close) - [x] Tests first; red → green per behaviour - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 65, acceptance 9 - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): domain 98.77%, no survivors in new code (the one unkilled mutant is the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline) - [ ] CI green (pending) Part of #13. Reviewed-on: #82 |
|||
| 1c185e6686 |
S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
All checks were successful
## What & why S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar. ## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD) - **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`. - **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test. - **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status. - **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN. - **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note. ## Key decisions (see ADR-0011) - **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant. - **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+). ## Verification - All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean. - No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it). - The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally). closes #75 Reviewed-on: #77 |
|||
| 22ab38f328 |
feat(domain): expose POST /registrations and the read endpoint (refs #6)
The BIG Domain Service Api wires the use cases and the hosted job worker:
POST /registrations creates the aggregate and starts the registratie process,
returning 202 with a location; GET /registrations/{id} reads the aggregate so
the eventually-opened zaak URL can be observed (ADR-0009). The Workflow Client
is registered once behind both Flowable ports; the ACL client and in-memory
store complete the wiring. Verified against a live flowable-rest: submit starts
a parked process and the worker polls it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
