S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m35s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m6s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m34s

## What & why

S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.

## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)

- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.

## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)

- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).

## Verification

- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).

closes #75

Reviewed-on: #77
This commit was merged in pull request #77.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-14 09:04:57 +00:00
parent bc9831c113
commit 1c185e6686
36 changed files with 1109 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@@ -41,4 +41,37 @@ public class AclHttpClientTests
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<InvalidOperationException>(() => client.OpenZaakAsync("123456782"));
Assert.Contains("empty", ex.Message, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
}
[Fact]
public async Task Approves_a_zaak_by_posting_its_url_to_statussen()
{
var capture = new RequestCapture();
var client = Client(capture.Responds(HttpStatusCode.NoContent));
await client.ApproveZaakAsync(new Uri("http://openzaak/zaken/api/v1/zaken/abc"));
Assert.Equal(HttpMethod.Post, capture.Seen!.Method);
Assert.Equal("http://acl/statussen", capture.Seen.RequestUri!.ToString());
Assert.Contains("\"zaakUrl\":\"http://openzaak/zaken/api/v1/zaken/abc\"", capture.Body);
}
[Fact]
public async Task Approve_throws_when_the_acl_rejects_the_request()
{
var capture = new RequestCapture();
var client = Client(capture.Responds(HttpStatusCode.BadGateway));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(
() => client.ApproveZaakAsync(new Uri("http://openzaak/zaken/api/v1/zaken/abc")));
}
[Fact]
public async Task Approve_rejects_a_null_zaak_url_without_sending_a_request()
{
var capture = new RequestCapture();
var client = Client(capture.Responds(HttpStatusCode.NoContent));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<ArgumentNullException>(() => client.ApproveZaakAsync(null!));
Assert.Null(capture.Seen);
}
}