Files
atomic-design-poc/backend
ehoandClaude Opus 5 ee0d449510 test(backend): assert every route is authz-gated (RB-12)
BL-006: the backend has zero automated architecture enforcement.
BIO-016 names the concrete consequence for authorization — nothing
asserted the *set* of gated endpoints, so BIO-003's X-Admin gate
(outside Authz) and BIO-004's two ungated endpoints were caught only
by a human reading Program.cs, not by CI.

Adds RouteInventoryTests: walks the real app's EndpointDataSource and
asserts every mapped route either carries a .Gate("XAdmin") metadata
marker (added at the 16 call sites that already call one of the five
admin wrappers — OrgAdmin/StamdataAdmin/CasesAdmin/Beoordelen/
FlagsAdmin) or appears in a written-down, reasoned allow-list. Proved
it's hard to fool by adding a throwaway unguarded route, watching the
test go red, and reverting.

The allow-list is not "public routes" as the ticket's shorthand put
it — 19 of its 31 entries are ownership-scoped inline (ctx.Zorgverlener()/
ctx.Caller()) endpoints, not public ones, and labelling them public
would misrepresent the exact property BIO-004 was about. Each entry
instead carries its own reason. Implementation note has the full
route-by-route breakdown and judgement calls.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:36:30 +02:00
..

BIG-register BFF (ASP.NET Core)

The backend that hosts the business rules for the BIG-register portal. The frontend renders the decisions this service computes; it does not recompute them (BFF-lite + decision DTOs — see ../docs/reference/architecture/0001-bff-lite-decision-dtos.md).

No real BRP/DUO: the reference data they'd return (registration, person, diplomas, notes — Data/SeedData.cs) is in-memory and seeded, but the endpoints, DTOs, status codes and error envelope are production-shaped.

Applications, documents and the brief persist to a SQLite file (src/BigRegister.Api/bigregister.db, EF Core-backed — Data/AppDbContext.cs, Data/Db.cs) created and migrated on first run; restarting the process (or docker compose restart api — the existing ./backend:/src bind mount already covers it, see docker-compose.yml) does not lose data. Delete the file to reset demo data back to empty, the same state a fresh clone starts from. This is a deliberate, right-sized choice for a POC (SQLite, no external DB service) — see docs/project/backlog/WP-22-durable-persistence.md.

Run

Everything (docker-compose, from repo root)

docker compose up

Backend only (local)

cd backend
dotnet run --project src/BigRegister.Api
# → http://localhost:5000/swagger

Frontend against a local backend

npm start          # ng serve, proxies /api → http://localhost:5000 (proxy.conf.json)

Tests

cd backend && dotnet test      # rule unit tests + endpoint integration tests

API

Method Route Purpose
GET /api/dashboard-view registration + person + computed herregistratie decision
GET /api/notes specialisms / aantekeningen
GET /api/brp/address BRP address lookup (gevonden:false = no address)
GET /api/duo/diplomas diplomas with derived profession + applicable policy questions, + manual fallback
GET /api/intake/policy scholing threshold (config value)
POST /api/registrations submit registration → reference, or 422 (manual diploma)

Rejections use ProblemDetails (RFC 7807) with status 422. Every request carries an X-Correlation-Id (set by the FE fetch adapter); the backend echoes it into a no-PII submit-audit log line (kind, outcome, reference, correlation id) — the seam for real structured logging / an audit store.

Versioning

Endpoints live under /api/v1. Additive changes (a new optional field) stay on v1: the NSwag-generated client and the FE parse* boundary ignore unknown fields, so old clients keep working. A breaking change (renamed/removed field, changed semantics) is introduced as /api/v2 served alongside v1 until clients migrate.

Where the rules live (src/BigRegister.Api/Domain/)

  • Diplomas/DiplomaRules.cs — profession derivation + which policy questions apply.
  • Registrations/HerregistratieRule.cs — eligibility + reason + status invariant.
  • Intake/IntakePolicy.cs — scholing threshold + completeness re-validation on submit (RejectIncompleteScholing, WP-69).
  • Submissions/SubmissionRules.cs — submit rejections + reference generation.

Typed client (NSwag)

The frontend calls this API through a generated TypeScript client. Regenerate it from the contract after a shape change:

npm run gen:api    # builds backend → swagger.json → src/app/shared/infrastructure/api-client.ts

Maintainability: changing a policy is one backend change

Goal: require every Verpleegkundige diploma to confirm a Dutch skills assessment. This is a new policy question on a diploma type.

Edit one fileDomain/Diplomas/DiplomaRules.cs:

 public static IReadOnlyList<PolicyQuestion> QuestionsFor(Diploma d)
 {
     var questions = new List<PolicyQuestion>();
     if (d.Engelstalig)
         questions.Add(NlTaalEngelstalig);
+    if (d.Opleiding == "verpleegkunde")
+        questions.Add(new PolicyQuestion(
+            "bekwaamheid",
+            "Heeft u in de afgelopen vijf jaar een bekwaamheidstoets afgelegd?",
+            QuestionType.JaNee));
     return questions;
 }

Rebuild the backend (docker compose up or dotnet run). The new question now appears in the registration wizard for HBO-Verpleegkunde.

  • No frontend change. The FE renders whatever questions the API returns.
  • No client regeneration. The wire shape (PolicyQuestionDto) is unchanged — only the data behind it. npm run gen:api is only needed when a DTO shape changes.

Add a unit test for the new rule in tests/BigRegister.Tests/RuleTests.cs and you're done.