All three wizard containers read `this.seed()` in the constructor. Angular
binds component inputs after the constructor runs, so the value was always the
`initial` default, `seeded !== initial` was always false, and every mount took
the `draftSync.resume()` branch. The `seed` input was dead code.
The two single-step forms built on the same idiom read the input inside the
microtask and work correctly. That contrast is the diagnosis.
Impact: 21 seeded wizard stories rendered step 1 instead of the state they
asked for. Storybook is this repo's UI test surface, so the states with no
other coverage were exactly the ones not rendering — Submitting, Submitted,
Failed, Ingediend, Mislukt. The a11y runner checks that whatever rendered is
accessible, never that the right thing rendered, so nothing caught it.
Production was unaffected: no route binds `seed`.
Read the input inside the microtask, matching the two forms. Turn the spec's
old `componentInstance.dispatch(...)` workaround into a real regression test
through `componentRef.setInput('seed', ...)`.
Verified: with the intake fix reverted the two spec cases fail; with it, 319
pass. `npm run ci --full` is green, and the newly rendered markup produced no
axe violations. A browser check of seven seeded stories across all three
wizards asserts text only reachable from a seed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Opus 5
f3e5745145