# OpenZaak integration harness (WP-54) A real OpenZaak, for developing/testing the ZGW seam (`backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Zgw/`) against something that isn't a fixture or a stub `HttpMessageHandler`. Deliberately **not** part of the root `docker-compose.yml` and **not** wired into `npm run ci` / CI — see [docs/reference/openzaak-integration.md](../../docs/reference/openzaak-integration.md) for the full picture; this is just "how to run it". ## Bring it up ```bash cd backend/openzaak docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml up -d # postgres, redis, migrate+configure, OpenZaak ./bootstrap-catalogus.sh # seeds a catalogus/zaaktype/zaak to read back ``` `bootstrap-catalogus.sh` waits for OpenZaak to answer, then over plain REST + a hand-rolled HS256 JWT (same shape as `ZgwTokenProvider.cs`, matching the `bigregister-test` client `setup_configuration/data.yaml` creates): a catalogus, a published zaaktype ("Herregistratie arts", with the statustypen/resultaattype/roltype OpenZaak requires before a zaaktype can be published), and one zaak (`BIG-2026-000123`) with an initiator rol for the seeded BSN (`111222333` — the same fixture BSN `OpenZaakZaakSourceTests.cs` uses). It writes what it seeded to `seeded.env` (gitignored) and prints a summary. **Not idempotent** — re-running against the same (already-seeded) instance fails on OpenZaak's `domein`+`rsin` uniqueness constraint for the catalogus. Reset with: ```bash docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml down -v && docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml up -d ``` ## Run the integration test against it ```bash cd backend dotnet test --filter Category=Integration ``` `OpenZaakIntegrationTests.cs` points a `WebApplicationFactory` at `Zgw:Enabled=true` + `http://localhost:8000` with the harness's credentials, hits `GET /api/v1/admin/cases`, and asserts the seeded zaak comes back — through the real HTTP + JWT + Catalogi-label-resolution path, not a mock. This test is tagged `Category=Integration` and is **excluded** from the default `dotnet test` run and from CI (`ci.yml`, `scripts/ci-local.sh` both filter `Category!=Integration`) — it only passes with this harness up, so it never runs where the harness doesn't exist. ## Tear down ```bash docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml down -v ``` ## What's in here / what isn't - `docker-compose.openzaak.yml` — postgres (postgis), redis, a one-shot `web-init` (runs Django migrations then `setup_configuration` against `setup_configuration/data.yaml`), and `web` (the OpenZaak API on `:8000`). Pinned to `openzaak/open-zaak:1.29.1`. No celery/celery-beat/celery-flower/nginx — trimmed for a lean, fast-booting harness; add them back only if a later WP needs a real async notification delivery round-trip here (WP-52's webhook is already covered by fixture tests against no live instance). `NOTIFICATIONS_DISABLED=true` is required, not optional: without it, OpenZaak 500s (and **rolls back the whole create**) on any notified resource — see the compose file's comment. - `setup_configuration/data.yaml` — the declarative, scripted alternative to clicking through the Django admin (upstream's own documented `setup_configuration` CLI mechanism): creates the one `bigregister-test` client (`heeft_alle_autorisaties: true` — this instance never exists for anything but this harness, so there's no least-privilege boundary worth modeling). - `bootstrap-catalogus.sh` — the business content (catalogus/zaaktype/zaak/…) `setup_configuration` has no YAML for; every field value here was checked against OpenZaak's own OpenAPI spec and a live run of this exact script, not guessed (two OpenZaak quirks it works around: a zaaktype needs ≥1 resultaattype and 2 statustypen before it can be published, and its `selectielijstklasse` and the zaaktype's `selectielijstProcestype` must reference the same `procesType` on the public VNG selectielijst API). - **Not here**: Documenten (DRC) / Notificaties (NRC) content — add if a later WP needs to prove those round-trips against a live instance too (WP-51/52 are fixture-tested today).