Commit Graph
12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ehoandClaude Opus 5 e270b8612f refactor(backend): reorder Program.cs sections into reads-then-writes (RB-19)
CQ-006 found that Program.cs states a reads-then-writes principle at the
top of the file, then abandons it for five feature sections that mix GET
and mutating endpoints in mapping order. This is a pure reorder: within
Document upload, Applications, Admin cases, Brief, and Organization
templates, every GET now precedes every POST/PUT/DELETE, each split by a
`--- reads ---`/`--- writes ---` sub-banner in the style WP-65 already
established for Beoordeling/Besluit.

DELETE /admin/cases/{id} and GET /admin/audit move up beside GET
/admin/cases, closing the 129-line gap CQ-006 measured. GET
/admin/org-template/{subOrgId}/preview moves from the Brief section to
the Organization-templates section it actually belongs to.

No route, signature, DTO, or handler body changed. Every block was cut
by exact line-range slicing, never retyped. The sorted list of mapped
HTTP-method-plus-path strings is byte-identical before and after; every
.Gate(...) count is unchanged; the three routes that moved with a gate
were checked by eye against the wrapper their handler actually calls,
per RB-12's stated limitation that the route-table test only proves a
marker is present, not that it still matches the handler.

npm run gen:api regenerated backend/swagger.json and
libs/shared/src/infrastructure/api-client.ts; both diffs are ordering
only (sorted-file diff is empty), committed alongside per the ticket's
own guidance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 19:16:05 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 d0fda08bcc fix(brief): make GET /brief a pure query, 404 when absent (RB-23)
GET /brief allocated a row on first call (BriefStore.GetOrCreate) — the
one endpoint in the backend where a read performed a persisted write.
The FE retries GETs automatically, so a transient failure could enter
the create path more than once; a lock prevented a duplicate row, but
the safety depended on the lock, not on the endpoint being a query.

Split GetOrCreate into Get (a pure query) and the already-existing
ResetAndCreate (POST /brief/reset owns creation). GET /brief now 404s
when the owner has no brief yet. GET /brief/preview used GetOrCreate
too, so it gets the same Get + 404 treatment, forced by the split.

RB-22 already made BriefStore.load() on the FE tolerate a 404 by
calling reset() once; this ticket is what makes that branch live.

Updated the brief/preview/org-template backend tests that assumed
GET seeded a brief on first call to create one explicitly first, and
added a test that GET 404s and writes no row without the fix (verified
red beforehand). Regenerated the API client (npm run gen:api).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 19:01:06 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 2627799284 fix(backend): 400 instead of 500 on an unparseable peildatum (RB-16)
BIO-019: GET /stamdata/{table}?peildatum= called DateOnly.Parse
directly, which throws FormatException on anything unparseable — an
unhandled 500 (leaking exception detail in Development) instead of
the 400-with-problem-details every other bad-input check in this file
returns. §3c named backend/Stamdata's 71.7% branch coverage (BL-005)
as the weak spot this bug lived in.

Switched to DateOnly.TryParse; an unparseable value now returns
Results.Problem(detail: ..., statusCode: 400), matching the shape the
upload/change-request endpoints already use. Endpoint doc gained
.ProducesProblem(400), so the OpenAPI doc + generated client were
regenerated and committed in this same diff (RB-09's note records a
prior incident where a response-shape change shipped without this and
the drift went unnoticed).

No FE change needed: libs/beheer's stamdata adapter already funnels
every call through runSubmit, which folds any thrown ApiException
(now including this 400) into a generic Result error — ADR-0001's
"the FE renders the decision" already covers "the server rejected
this input".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:53:29 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 1fad740606 fix(api): regenerate client for RB-08's 403 response shape
RB-08 changed DELETE /admin/uploads/{documentId}'s 403 mapping from
.Produces to .ProducesProblem, matching CasesAdmin's actual
Results.Problem() response - but the generated OpenAPI doc and typed
client were never regenerated alongside it, so CI's api-client-drift
check (npm run gen:api && git diff --exit-code) was left red. No
frontend consumes this admin-only endpoint (confirmed by grep), so
this is a pure regeneration with no consumer impact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 14:21:26 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 0298ecc506 fix(uploads): delete the dead POST /registrations (RB-06)
POST /registrations passed its Documents list straight to Submit, which calls
DocumentStore.Link on every digital documentId in it — and linking a document
blocks its owner from ever deleting it (DeleteOwned returns 409 Linked). That
path had no ForeignIds ownership check, so any authenticated citizen could
post another citizen's document id and permanently block them from deleting
their own diploma scan. POST /applications/{id}/submit, the endpoint actually
in use, has had that guard since it was written.

Deleted rather than guarded: the endpoint is dead. No frontend caller, and
the whole registratie flow goes through /applications/{id}/submit.
RegistratieRequest went with it, and so did SubmissionRules.RejectRegistratie
— reachable only from here, and contradicted by the live path, which treats a
handmatig diploma as "does not auto-approve" rather than a 422 rejection. Its
own message said as much while being returned as a rejection. That last part
is a judgement call beyond the ticket's wording; reverting the two
SubmissionRules hunks restores it in isolation.

Coverage moved rather than vanished: the problem+json shape assertion is now
on /change-requests (the other endpoint on the same Submit helper), and the
linked-delete 409 test goes through the real submit path.

swagger.json, the generated client and the behaviour spec regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 11:04:03 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 6bc00a917c refactor(backend): delete dead legacy endpoints, make domain types unions (WP-72 + WP-73)
Two work packages in one commit because both edit Program.cs and splitting
them would leave a commit that does not build.

WP-72 — deletes POST /api/v1/intakes and /herregistraties. Both were dead
from the UI (the wizard submits via /applications/{id}/submit) and strictly
less capable: they minted a bare reference and wrote no Aanvraag, made no
ZGW call, and did no document-ownership check. The shared Submit(...) helper
survives — /registrations and /change-requests still use it. WP-69 hardened
/intakes with a 400 last session; removing the surface is the stronger fix,
and WP-69's /applications/{id}/submit enforcement is untouched.

WP-73 — RegistrationStatus becomes an abstract record with three sealed
variants behind a private base ctor, so only Geregistreerd carries a
herregistratie deadline and reden is required on Geschorst/Doorgehaald
(matching the FE union, which was already right). HerregistratieRule
.IsStatusConsistent and its test are deleted: the type now guarantees what
the runtime check was for, and the test could no longer construct the
illegal state it existed to catch.

Aanvraag splits into a Concept | Submitted | Decided union with the EF row
demoted to AanvraagEntity behind a two-way mapper. Submitted carries a
non-null Referentie and SubmittedAt, and Decided.Afgewezen/MeerInfoGevraagd
require a Toelichting — so the five Referentie! null-forgiving derefs in
StatusAt are gone, not merely suppressed. IZaakSource.CreateZaak narrows to
Aanvraag.Submitted, removing the same class of deref in both zaak sources.

Draft is now cleared on submit rather than lingering: ApplicationStore's
doc-comment claimed "Concept only" but Submit never cleared it. Verified
nothing reads a submitted aanvraag's draft (draft-sync's applyResume only
resumes unsubmitted wizards), so the comment is now true instead of
aspirational.

No migration, no schema change, no wire change — RegistrationStatusDto and
the application DTOs are byte-identical, confirmed against a live swagger.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 16:31:38 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 5d73ca21f6 feat(backend): enforce the scholing threshold server-side (WP-69)
ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.

IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.

Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.

Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 22:42:14 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 fd04221d2f chore(api): regenerate client for F1's new 400 responses
npm run gen:api after WP-68 F1 — draft-sync and submit now document their
document-ownership 400 ProblemDetails response.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:33:50 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 af8a011819 feat(behandelportal): WP-65b beoordeling besluit (decision write)
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 56s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m19s
CI / backend (pull_request) Failing after 1m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Canceled after 40s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Canceled after 24s
Adds POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit: a Besluit enum (Goedkeuren/Afwijzen/
MeerInfoOpvragen) backed by new Aanvraag.BesluitStatus/BesluitToelichting
columns, gated by the same BeoordelingRules.CanDecide the read side's
canBesluiten flag already uses (409 on an illegal transition, 400 on a
missing required toelichting). Mappers.ToStatusDto gains the "a recorded
decision wins" branch. FE: besluit.machine.ts + besluit-form organism
(same form idiom as change-request-form), wired into the beoordeling page
behind the server's canBesluiten flag.

Completes WP-65 (65a + 65b) — verified end-to-end against a running
backend (werkvoorraad -> beoordeling -> besluit -> status reflected back).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:46:20 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 4133b30e5d feat(behandelportal): WP-65a beoordeling detail (read) + fix unreachable medewerker login
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m38s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m28s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 2m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /beoordeling/{id} shows one aanvraag's status, linked documents, and a
canBesluiten decision flag, gated by the same CanBeoordelen capability as the
werkvoorraad list. Reads through IZaakSource.ListCases rather than a new seam
method (WP-66 needs one anyway for the real write); owner BSN is masked.

Fixes a real gap found while wiring this up: the behandelportal's login was still
WP-61's copied citizen/BSN DigiD flow, so nothing ever sent X-Medewerker and the
werkvoorraad screen (WP-64) always denied in a real browser. A dev-only
medewerkerInterceptor (mirrors the existing ?role= stand-in as ?rollen=) fixes that.

WP-65's own Risks note authorized splitting read from write across sessions given
its size; this is the read half. The decision-recording mutation is next (65b).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:01:09 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 fe69caee63 feat(behandelportal): WP-64 werkvoorraad (queue) screen
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m14s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /werkvoorraad endpoint lists aanvragen still open (Ingediend/InBehandeling),
gated by the medewerker capability (CanBeoordelen) rather than the admin role — reuses
the existing ApplicationSummaryDto, no new DTO. GET /me now surfaces aanvraag:beoordelen
for a behandelaar so the FE can gate with the same AccessStore/capabilityGuard idiom
every other page uses.

FE: a behandeling domain type deliberately narrower than ssp's full AanvraagStatus
union (only the two open tags — illegal states unrepresentable), composed into a
werkvoorraad-list organism from existing shared/ui molecules. Replaces WP-61's
scaffold placeholder as the app's real landing page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 22:02:35 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 e7156c5132 feat(WP-67): merge behandelportal into this repo as a monorepo
Restructures into apps/ssp + apps/behandelportal (two Angular projects)
plus libs/shared + libs/beheer (cross-app libraries), replacing WP-61's
separate sibling repo. That split had already produced real drift: a
hand-vendored copy of the backend's OpenAPI doc, a shared/ui+layout tree
forked and silently diverging (7 files), and beheer + the styles.scss
token bridge duplicated byte-for-byte across both repos.

- git mv the SSP's src/app/* into apps/ssp/; fold shared/, beheer/,
  environments/, the Storybook docs/*.mdx, and styles.scss into
  libs/shared + libs/beheer (all confirmed identical between the two
  repos before merging). auth stays deliberately duplicated per
  ADR-0002 (actor-specific, expected to diverge) - amended there.
- One generated API client (libs/shared), no more vendored swagger.json.
- .dependency-cruiser split into a base factory + one config per app,
  and Storybook into .storybook-ssp/.storybook-behandelportal - both
  forced by the @auth/* alias resolving to different directories per app.
- SiteHeaderComponent/ShellComponent gained HEADER_NAV_ITEMS/
  HEADER_ADMIN_LINKS/DEBUG_PANEL injection tokens so each app supplies
  its own nav/admin-links/dev-panel instead of one being hardcoded.
- CLAUDE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, dependencies.md, and ADR-0002 updated;
  WP-67 backlog entry documents the full decision trail.

npm run ci green (lint, dep:check x2, 360 tests across ssp/
behandelportal/shared/beheer, both localized builds, backend tests,
snippet + api-client drift); both dev servers, both Storybook
instances, and docker compose verified working.

The old sibling repo (/home/eho/repos/behandelportal) is left
untouched, not deleted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 21:01:57 +02:00