BriefStore.load() now treats a 404 from GET /brief as "no brief exists
yet" and calls the existing reset() command once, instead of showing
the generic load-failed error. BriefAdapter.load() gains a
BriefLoadFailure error channel (notFound | error) so the store can
tell a 404 apart from every other failure; every other adapter method
stays on runSubmit, unchanged.
The once-only bound is a field on the store, not a comment: a second
404 (from a later load() call) always falls through to the ordinary
error path, and the recovery path never calls load() again, so no
loop can form.
This is the expand half of CQ-007's split (04-cqrs-light.md). Today's
backend never 404s GET /brief, so the new branch is dead code until
RB-23 (the backend contract half) ships in a later merge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0002 SS3 models Zorgverlener/Medewerker as different Principal
variants with different login flows. Actor #2 (apps/behandelportal)
landed in WP-61/67 and the union never followed: grep -rn "Principal"
returned one hit, a comment. Both apps' auth/domain/session.ts stayed
byte-identical (`{ bsn, naam }`), so the backoffice's Behandelaar
carried a BSN and logged into the backoffice as a citizen, by DigiD,
under a fabricated citizen's name (login.page.ts). The divergence
ADR-0002 predicted took an orthogonal side door instead
(medewerker.interceptor.ts's X-Medewerker/X-Rollen stamp, which never
touches SessionStore) -- which is why ssp/auth and bhp/auth still
measured as 100%/84% duplicated after ADR-C-006 shared the route
guards. RB-09 (landed the day before) made the backend's
IIdentityProvider able to say "no identity" and fail closed; this
ticket is its named FE half.
Each app's auth/domain/session.ts becomes principal.ts, holding the
one Principal variant that app actually has an actor for: ssp keeps
`{ kind: 'zorgverlener', bsn, naam }` (G1 still strips the BSN before
persisting); behandelportal gets `{ kind: 'medewerker', medewerkerId,
naam, rollen }` (no BSN to strip -- G2 shape validation only). A new
MedewerkerAdapter replaces DigidAdapter in behandelportal, resolving
the existing MEDEWERKER_ID/currentRollen() dev stand-in into a
Principal; because there is no credential to check, it returns
Principal directly rather than a Result whose error variant could
never occur. login.page.ts stops being a BSN/wachtwoord form -- one
explainer line and an "Inloggen met SSO" button -- and its dead
error-handling branch goes with the Result wrapper that justified it.
Measured with tools/baseline-scan.mjs --dup: auth duplication drops
from 168/168 (ssp) and 168/200 (bhp) to 32/179 and 32/259 -- under the
backlog's <40 target. What remains is the ADR-C-006 route-guard
re-export (deliberately identical), generic test/story-file
boilerplate, and one shared fragment of the root-singleton-store
idiom -- not re-converged identity or login-flow logic. SS3's
prediction that the two actors would authenticate differently enough
to justify not sharing auth has now actually been tested, not just
asserted, and held.
Also: renamed Session.bsn to Principal.bsn in two doc comments
(libs/shared/src/infrastructure/subject.ts, subject.interceptor.ts)
that cited the old type name; regenerated
libs/shared/docs/behaviour-spec.mdx (generated file, per its own
banner); recorded the resolution in ADR-0002 as a new amendment,
replacing its "Known debt" section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New backend test classes (RouteInventoryTests, SwaggerGateTests) plus
one added case to StamdataEndpointTests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
runSubmit did two things at once: fold a call into a Result, and mint
an Idempotency-Key for it. Five call sites are reads and had no
business minting one — brief.adapter.ts:load, org-template.adapter.ts
:list/:load, and stamdata.adapter.ts:list/:load. stamdata.adapter.ts's
own docstring already said "Both endpoints are reads … There is no
write method" while both called runSubmit; that mismatch is the
sharpest evidence, and the reason the baseline's original "~13
mutations" count (derived from the helper's name, not the code) was
wrong by five in one direction.
Split submit.ts in place: runResult is the try/catch + problemDetail
fold with no mint; runSubmit is runResult wrapping
withIdempotencyKey. Zero behaviour change for the 8 real mutations
(brief save/submit/approve/reject/send/reset, org-template
save/publish/rollback) — same fold, same mint, same timing. The five
reads now run the fold with no pendingIdempotencyKey touched.
submit.spec.ts asserts the split behaviourally via
currentIdempotencyKey() (two reads inside the same call agree only
when a key was minted and reused) rather than mocking a relative
import, matching this repo's existing vitest convention. Verified red
without the fix by temporarily reintroducing the mint into runResult.
ApplicationsStore.cancel/AdminCasesStore.delete (RB-20) and
FeatureFlagStore.set are out of scope and untouched — the latter
already calls runSubmit correctly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BIO-012: roleInterceptor/subjectInterceptor are correctly registered
only under isDevMode(), but three hand-written fetch adapters
(reveal-bignummer, letter-preview, org-template's proefbrief) bypass
HttpClient and set X-Role/X-Subject themselves with no guard. The
readers underneath, role.ts and subject.ts, were ungated too: they
read ?role=/?subject= and wrote it into sessionStorage on any
navigation, in any build -- for ?subject= that value is a BSN, which
is exactly what SessionStore's G1 comment promises never happens.
Gate both layers: currentRole()/currentSubject() return their safe
default immediately outside isDevMode() (no query-param read, no
sessionStorage write), and the three adapters additionally wrap their
headers in isDevMode() so a production request carries neither header
at all, matching what an HttpClient request already does once the
interceptors aren't registered.
TE-002: reveal-bignummer's response-shape validation was a "Trust
boundary" a spec could only reach by stubbing globalThis.fetch.
Exported it as parseRevealed(body), matching the other 30 parse*
boundaries in the repo. Same treatment for letter-preview's
errorMessage and org-template's proefbrief error mapping (extracted
from an inline try/catch into a named, exported function first, since
it wasn't already separate).
BIO-006(a): reveal-bignummer sent X-Step-Up: 'true' unconditionally,
so the backend's step-up precondition constrained nothing. reveal()
now takes a stepUp flag; BriefStore.revealBigNummer() -- reachable
only after the UI's confirm() gesture -- is the one that supplies it,
so the literal no longer lives in the transport adapter.
BIO-006(b): documented in roles-and-access.md that drafter is also
the backend's fallback identity (StubIdentityProvider's catch-all
arm), not just the dev switcher's initial choice -- so the
least-privilege consequence of it also being the only role that may
reveal a BSN is visible.
Doc correction, same diff: roles-and-access.md's "wired only under
isDevMode()" claim was false for the three hand-written fetch paths;
it now says where the gate lives (interceptor registration and the
reader functions) so it doesn't go stale the same way again.
CLAUDE.md's dev-only claims needed no correction -- they already
noted these three calls bypass the interceptor.
Every fix has a test confirmed red by temporarily reverting the
source change and rerunning the suite before restoring it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`npm run gen:behaviour-spec`'s drift check (part of `npm run ci`)
caught two things: RB-07 had already left this generated doc stale
(three of its new AuthzAuditTests cases were never picked up), and
RB-08/RB-09 added more test names since. Regenerated so the doc
matches the suite it claims to mirror.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SessionStore.restore() — identical in both apps — read localStorage itself
and did the parse plus shape validation in the same module-private function,
invoked from a field initializer, so the storage read happened the instant
the singleton was constructed and no spec could feed it a raw string. The
logic it guards is a trust boundary, not incidental validation: the comment
above it names G1 (never persist the BSN) and G2 (validate the shape before
trusting it), and CLAUDE.md mandates a spec for boundary parse* adapters.
ssp/auth and bhp/auth were jointly the worst-covered frontend modules.
parseStoredSession(raw) moves into each app's auth/domain/session.ts, which
is pure TS and already had a spec, so no new scaffolding was needed;
restore() collapses to one line. Four cases: absent, non-JSON, wrong shape,
and — BIO-017's addition — a stored {"bsn":…,"naam":…} restoring with bsn
'', which makes the G1 guarantee executable rather than merely commented.
Verified red without the fix.
Landed twice, once per app, deliberately. TE-001 and BL-002 both say an
extract-to-shared here would contradict ADR-0002, which models the two
actors as different Principal variants and expects the two auth contexts to
diverge; RB-13 is what differentiates them.
Also specs redactProfile (BIO-017's second half) — a pure exported
PII-redaction function that had none.
behaviour-spec.mdx is regenerated, which also picks up the test names RB-07
added; that commit should have carried them and did not.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
POST /registrations passed its Documents list straight to Submit, which calls
DocumentStore.Link on every digital documentId in it — and linking a document
blocks its owner from ever deleting it (DeleteOwned returns 409 Linked). That
path had no ForeignIds ownership check, so any authenticated citizen could
post another citizen's document id and permanently block them from deleting
their own diploma scan. POST /applications/{id}/submit, the endpoint actually
in use, has had that guard since it was written.
Deleted rather than guarded: the endpoint is dead. No frontend caller, and
the whole registratie flow goes through /applications/{id}/submit.
RegistratieRequest went with it, and so did SubmissionRules.RejectRegistratie
— reachable only from here, and contradicted by the live path, which treats a
handmatig diploma as "does not auto-approve" rather than a 422 rejection. Its
own message said as much while being returned as a rejection. That last part
is a judgement call beyond the ticket's wording; reverting the two
SubmissionRules hunks restores it in isolation.
Coverage moved rather than vanished: the problem+json shape assertion is now
on /change-requests (the other endpoint on the same Submit helper), and the
linked-delete 409 test goes through the real submit path.
swagger.json, the generated client and the behaviour spec regenerated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
FeatureFlagStore.set() was try/finally with no catch. A rejected
PUT /admin/flags/{key} escaped into the `void this.store.set(...)` call site
as an unhandled promise rejection; the finally-block reload then snapped the
control back to its old value. The admin saw a toggle that silently refused
to move, with no error rendered anywhere and nothing in the state.
set() now folds through the existing runSubmit helper and returns
Result<string, void>, reloading either way so the state still reflects the
server. The page awaits it and renders the failure in an app-alert.
Found by the CQRS-light pass (CQ-002/CQ-004) as one of three mutations that
reach the raw ApiClient without producing a Result — the baseline's BL-007
inventory had missed all three.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
authGuard and capabilityGuard were duplicated byte-for-byte across both
apps, along with their specs — 57 of the 211 duplicated lines BL-002
measured in the two auth contexts, the largest block after session.store.ts.
They are not actor-specific. They ask "is anyone logged in" and "may they do
X", never "who are you or how did you get here". ADR-0002 §3's non-sharing
decision scopes to identity and login flow — Principal, DigiD vs employee
SSO — and a route guard is neither; §Consequences names auth.guard.ts only
as a seam that localises the change, not as something that must be
duplicated.
Moves both to libs/shared/src/application/auth.guard.ts, reading SESSION_PORT
instead of an app-local SessionStore. The port gains one member,
isAuthenticated: Signal<boolean> — free, because both SessionStores already
expose exactly that (session.store.ts:40) and both apps already register
{ provide: SESSION_PORT, useExisting: SessionStore }. The seam existed; it
was just narrower than what it already carried.
Each app keeps a re-export at @auth/auth.guard so app.routes.ts is untouched
— routing asks the auth context for its guards, which is the direction the
boundary should read. The two identical specs collapse into one, plus a case
asserting the guard resolves through the port.
Deliberately NOT merged: session.store.ts, session.ts, digid.adapter.ts,
login-form.component.ts, login.page.ts. Those are identical only because
ADR-C-004 (Session -> Principal) was never executed. Merging them would make
a citizen DigiD/BSN login the backoffice's shared login.
Measured with tools/baseline-scan.mjs: ssp/auth duplicated lines 211 -> 151,
bhp/auth 86.8% -> 82.5%, repo-wide 7.1% -> 6.6%. Both guard clone pairs drop
out of the top-clones list. What remains is exactly the three files
ADR-C-004 should differentiate.
behaviour-spec.mdx regenerated (the spec moved libraries).
Verified: lint, typecheck, dep:check (0 violations, 224 modules), prettier,
ng build --localize for both apps, and 407 tests passing across all four
projects.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four close-outs and their README rows. The behaviour spec is regenerated
once here rather than per-track — it derives from every test name in the
repo, so any track running it would have conflicted with the other three.
Records two findings the arc surfaced but did not cause: the /brief/preview
staleness for non-DemoOwner identities (blocking per-spec identity isolation
in brief-v2.spec.ts), and that WP-72/73 had to share a commit because both
edit Program.cs — separate execution waves prevented build collisions but
did not produce separable diffs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.
IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.
Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.
Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gherkin/Cucumber was considered and rejected for business-readable BDD
scenarios: step-binding by runtime string match undoes the compile-time
guarantees WP-70 just added, and needs two frameworks for .NET+TS with
no non-technical co-author in view. Instead scripts/gen-behaviour-spec.mjs
(modeled on the existing gen-snippets.mjs) extracts every describe/it
and [Fact]/[Theory] name straight from the real suites into
libs/shared/docs/behaviour-spec.mdx, gated for drift in CI exactly like
gen-snippets/gen-api — the page can never diverge from the tests because
it's generated from them, and test names stay the single source of truth.
scripts/check-seam.sh guards the one FE/BE rule duplication most likely
to silently diverge: IntakePolicy.cs's ScholingThreshold vs
intake.machine.ts's SCHOLING_THRESHOLD_DEFAULT, two unlinked literals
pinned separately in each side's own tests but never against each other.
package.json/CI wiring for both (gen:behaviour-spec, check:seam) shipped
in the prior commit alongside the typecheck gate, since all three touch
the same few config files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Opus 5