RuleTests/OpenZaakZaakSourceTests hand-built Aanvraag fixtures by initializer,
keeping Submitted/Referentie/SubmittedAt/BesluitStatus consistent by hand. A
type-state builder (Given.Concept().Submitted().Decided()) makes an illegal
sequence a compile error instead, and delegates the toelichting-required rule
to the real BeoordelingRules so it can't drift from production. Adds
BesluitLifecycleTests covering the WP-68 besluit invariants end to end.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Concurrent_besluiten_on_the_same_aanvraag_yield_exactly_one_success: races two
besluiten on the same open aanvraag, asserts exactly one 200 and one 409 — the
behavior F2's in-lock guard exists to guarantee.
- Only_a_non_approval_requires_a_toelichting: unit test for
BeoordelingRules.RequiresToelichting (F6).
- A_terminal_decision_refuses_any_further_besluit /
MeerInfoOpvragen_is_not_terminal_a_further_besluit_is_still_legal: the transition
table at the aggregate level (T3) — an Aanvraag whose BesluitStatus already records
a decision computes a terminal StatusAt, and CanDecide refuses a further besluit,
independent of the endpoint-level equivalent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The status was derived in Contracts/Mappers.ToStatusDto, not the domain; Concept was
a magic "Concept" string with no AanvraagStatusTag member; and the besluit endpoint
re-derived its own guard by reading the status back out of the DTO and Enum.Parse-ing
it. New Domain/Applications/AanvraagStatus.cs models the full status (Concept
included, via a null Tag rather than a sixth enum member) as a closed type,
constructible only through its factories. Aanvraag.StatusAt(now) carries the logic
verbatim; Mappers.ToStatusDto and ZgwZaakMapper's two status producers become
one-line projections onto the same wire DTO, so the wire shape is unchanged (gen:api
shows zero diff beyond F1's). The one remaining Enum.Parse (the beoordeling GET,
which crosses the IZaakSource wire boundary) is now non-throwing on an unrecognised
tag.
Also, WP-68 F2: the besluit transition-legality check now runs inside
ApplicationStore.RecordBesluit's write lock instead of in the endpoint beforehand —
two concurrent besluiten used to both pass the check before either wrote, letting
the second silently overwrite a terminal decision. RecordBesluit returns an
Ok/NotFound/Conflict outcome, mirroring DocumentStore.DeleteResult.
Also, WP-68 F6: the "toelichting required" rule moves from an inline endpoint check
into BeoordelingRules.RequiresToelichting, alongside CanDecide.
The three tests naming this refactor's regression net
(AanvraagStatusTag_covers_the_published_lifecycle,
AutoApprovable_flips_to_goedgekeurd_after_the_window, ZgwZaakMapperTests) pass
unmodified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New GET /beoordeling/{id} shows one aanvraag's status, linked documents, and a
canBesluiten decision flag, gated by the same CanBeoordelen capability as the
werkvoorraad list. Reads through IZaakSource.ListCases rather than a new seam
method (WP-66 needs one anyway for the real write); owner BSN is masked.
Fixes a real gap found while wiring this up: the behandelportal's login was still
WP-61's copied citizen/BSN DigiD flow, so nothing ever sent X-Medewerker and the
werkvoorraad screen (WP-64) always denied in a real browser. A dev-only
medewerkerInterceptor (mirrors the existing ?role= stand-in as ?rollen=) fixes that.
WP-65's own Risks note authorized splitting read from write across sessions given
its size; this is the read half. The decision-recording mutation is next (65b).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reshape the adreswijziging form into a contact-change form: the BRP address is
authoritative and shown read-only (you change it at the gemeente), and the phone
number becomes the editable/submittable field. New Telefoonnummer value object
(parse-don't-validate); backend RejectPhoneChange re-validates as authority.
POST /change-requests now carries { telefoon } (typed client regenerated).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Categories stay server-owned (ADR-0001); the FE sends its answers to
/uploads/categories and re-fetches reactively when they change:
- Diplomabewijs required only for a handmatig diploma (DUO is verified digitally;
nothing required before a diploma is chosen).
- Bewijs Nederlandse taalvaardigheid required only when the applicant answers "ja"
to the nl-taalvaardigheid (B2) policy question.
CategoriesFor(wizardId, diplomaHerkomst, taalvaardigheid) decides; Find uses the
maximal set so uploads still validate. CategoriesLoaded drops orphaned uploads
when a category disappears. Also: show the foreground-only upload banner only when
there is at least one category.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the authoritative business rules off the frontend into a real backend,
realising the BFF-lite + decision-DTO design (ADR-0001) that until now lived
only in static mock JSON.
Backend (backend/):
- ASP.NET Core (.NET 10) minimal API, contract-first, Swagger UI at /swagger.
- DDD Domain/ rules layer: profession derivation + applicable policy questions
(DiplomaRules), herregistratie eligibility + reason (HerregistratieRule),
scholing threshold (IntakePolicy), submit rejections + reference generation
(SubmissionRules). In-memory seeded data, ProblemDetails (RFC 7807) errors.
- 27 xUnit tests: rule units + endpoint integration incl. BRP no-address and
DUO not-found fallbacks and 422 submit paths.
Frontend (only infrastructure/ + contracts/ change, as the architecture promised):
- NSwag-generated typed client (api-client.ts), routed through Angular HttpClient
via a small fetch adapter so the ?scenario= interceptor still applies.
- GET adapters use resource({ loader: client.x }); submit commands call the client
and map ProblemDetails -> err. The hardcoded uren==0 / manual-diploma rules are
deleted (now server-side). Domain, stores, UI and format validators unchanged.
- Deleted the now-dead public/mock/*.json.
Tooling/docs:
- npm start proxies /api -> backend; npm run gen:api regenerates the client;
docker compose up runs both (bind mounts use :z for SELinux/Fedora).
- backend/README.md walkthrough: adding a policy question is a one-file backend
change, no FE change, no client regen. Updated CLAUDE.md + ARCHITECTURE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5