The wire said Application, the domain said Aanvraag — one aggregate with
two names at every hop. Rename the backend DTOs and the /applications
route to /aanvragen, regenerate the typed client, and rename the frontend
adapter/store to match.
Renamed: ApplicationSummaryDto/DetailDto, CreateApplicationRequest,
SubmitApplicationRequest/Response → Aanvraag* equivalents;
ApplicationsAdapter/Store → AanvragenAdapter/Store;
applications.adapter.ts/applications.store.ts → aanvragen.*.
Left untouched: the admin Case/Zaak vocabulary (/admin/cases,
AdminCasesStore) — a separate read model, not part of this rename; the
internal BigRegister.Domain.Applications namespace and the Applications
EF table (renaming those needs a new EF migration, out of scope here).
Part of the dashboard-readability refactor (see the approved plan).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two work packages in one commit because both edit Program.cs and splitting
them would leave a commit that does not build.
WP-72 — deletes POST /api/v1/intakes and /herregistraties. Both were dead
from the UI (the wizard submits via /applications/{id}/submit) and strictly
less capable: they minted a bare reference and wrote no Aanvraag, made no
ZGW call, and did no document-ownership check. The shared Submit(...) helper
survives — /registrations and /change-requests still use it. WP-69 hardened
/intakes with a 400 last session; removing the surface is the stronger fix,
and WP-69's /applications/{id}/submit enforcement is untouched.
WP-73 — RegistrationStatus becomes an abstract record with three sealed
variants behind a private base ctor, so only Geregistreerd carries a
herregistratie deadline and reden is required on Geschorst/Doorgehaald
(matching the FE union, which was already right). HerregistratieRule
.IsStatusConsistent and its test are deleted: the type now guarantees what
the runtime check was for, and the test could no longer construct the
illegal state it existed to catch.
Aanvraag splits into a Concept | Submitted | Decided union with the EF row
demoted to AanvraagEntity behind a two-way mapper. Submitted carries a
non-null Referentie and SubmittedAt, and Decided.Afgewezen/MeerInfoGevraagd
require a Toelichting — so the five Referentie! null-forgiving derefs in
StatusAt are gone, not merely suppressed. IZaakSource.CreateZaak narrows to
Aanvraag.Submitted, removing the same class of deref in both zaak sources.
Draft is now cleared on submit rather than lingering: ApplicationStore's
doc-comment claimed "Concept only" but Submit never cleared it. Verified
nothing reads a submitted aanvraag's draft (draft-sync's applyResume only
resumes unsubmitted wizards), so the comment is now true instead of
aspirational.
No migration, no schema change, no wire change — RegistrationStatusDto and
the application DTOs are byte-identical, confirmed against a live swagger.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.
IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.
Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.
Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The doc-comment claimed "the backend re-validates on submit as the authority" —
it doesn't. Neither SubmitApplicationRequest nor IntakeRequest carries a scholing
answer at all, so there's nothing to re-validate; both submit paths only apply
SubmissionRules.RejectZeroUren. A crafted POST can bypass the scholing requirement
entirely. States the gap and points to WP-69 (opened, not yet planned) for the
enforcement, which needs a wire change.
Also strengthens the F2 concurrency test to assert the persisted status matches
whichever request actually won the race, and updates WP-68's own Decisions/
acceptance-criteria text to reflect two implementation choices that improved on
the original write-up once real constraints surfaced: ProcessingWindow stays on
ApplicationStore (StatusAt is already in the same file), and AanvraagStatusTag is
not given a Concept member (would have broken
AanvraagStatusTag_covers_the_published_lifecycle) — AanvraagStatus.Tag is nullable
instead, null exactly for Concept.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the authoritative business rules off the frontend into a real backend,
realising the BFF-lite + decision-DTO design (ADR-0001) that until now lived
only in static mock JSON.
Backend (backend/):
- ASP.NET Core (.NET 10) minimal API, contract-first, Swagger UI at /swagger.
- DDD Domain/ rules layer: profession derivation + applicable policy questions
(DiplomaRules), herregistratie eligibility + reason (HerregistratieRule),
scholing threshold (IntakePolicy), submit rejections + reference generation
(SubmissionRules). In-memory seeded data, ProblemDetails (RFC 7807) errors.
- 27 xUnit tests: rule units + endpoint integration incl. BRP no-address and
DUO not-found fallbacks and 422 submit paths.
Frontend (only infrastructure/ + contracts/ change, as the architecture promised):
- NSwag-generated typed client (api-client.ts), routed through Angular HttpClient
via a small fetch adapter so the ?scenario= interceptor still applies.
- GET adapters use resource({ loader: client.x }); submit commands call the client
and map ProblemDetails -> err. The hardcoded uren==0 / manual-diploma rules are
deleted (now server-side). Domain, stores, UI and format validators unchanged.
- Deleted the now-dead public/mock/*.json.
Tooling/docs:
- npm start proxies /api -> backend; npm run gen:api regenerates the client;
docker compose up runs both (bind mounts use :z for SELinux/Fedora).
- backend/README.md walkthrough: adding a policy question is a one-file backend
change, no FE change, no client regen. Updated CLAUDE.md + ARCHITECTURE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Opus 5