Realizes ADR-0004's "future low-code editor that commits a PR": an
admin-only stamdata maintenance editor built on the stamdata-as-code
foundation.
Backend: `professions` moves from a hardcoded C# dictionary to an embedded
`professions.json` data-file (typed as `ProfessionMapping`) with valid-time
(geldigVan/geldigTot, half-open). A generic, reflection-driven
StamdataCatalog/StamdataTable/StamdataFile describes every table so one
endpoint pair + one grid editor serve all of them; add a table in one line.
Two read-only, admin-gated endpoints (GET /stamdata, GET /stamdata/{table}
?peildatum=) — no runtime write path. Generic build gate
`Every_catalog_table_is_valid` (keys non-blank, no overlapping validity,
well-formed windows).
Frontend: new `beheer` context (route beheer/stamdata, capabilityGuard
'stamdata:edit'). A schema-driven grid editor edits rows locally; download()
emits {table}.json for the admin to commit as a reviewed PR (no mutation
command — the CI build + StamdataValidationTests stay the authority).
Full gate GREEN both sides; gen:api leaves no drift; new stamdata story
passes axe. See WP-29 + ADR-0004.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Applications, documents (+ audit log) and the brief move off static in-memory
Dictionaries onto a real SQLite file via EF Core, so demo data survives a
process restart or `docker compose restart api` for the first time. The three
stores (ApplicationStore/DocumentStore/BriefStore) keep their exact public
signatures and static-class shape — no DI, no async ripple into Program.cs's
minimal-API handlers — each method just opens a short-lived AppDbContext via
Db.Create() under the same lock it already had. Opaque nested shapes (a
wizard's draft snapshot, a brief's sections/placeholders/status) are stored as
JSON text columns rather than redesigned into relational tables, matching the
existing "don't interpret it" posture.
Found two things the WP's own text got wrong, corrected in
docs/backlog/WP-22-durable-persistence.md's Deviations section: SeedData never
seeded these three stores (only the read-only BRP/DUO-mimicking GETs, which
stay in-memory) so there's no seed step; and no new docker-compose volume is
needed since the existing bind mount already covers the SQLite file — verified
against this environment's real podman-backed compose stack, not just by
reading the file.
Also: pinned SQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite3 to 3.0.3 (EF Core Sqlite's own
transitive default bundles a pre-3.50.2 SQLite with a known high-severity
memory-corruption advisory); found and fixed a real xUnit test race where
concurrent test-class hosts stomped a shared static connection-string field,
fixed by disabling cross-class test parallelization rather than adding DI the
stores don't otherwise need.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the authoritative business rules off the frontend into a real backend,
realising the BFF-lite + decision-DTO design (ADR-0001) that until now lived
only in static mock JSON.
Backend (backend/):
- ASP.NET Core (.NET 10) minimal API, contract-first, Swagger UI at /swagger.
- DDD Domain/ rules layer: profession derivation + applicable policy questions
(DiplomaRules), herregistratie eligibility + reason (HerregistratieRule),
scholing threshold (IntakePolicy), submit rejections + reference generation
(SubmissionRules). In-memory seeded data, ProblemDetails (RFC 7807) errors.
- 27 xUnit tests: rule units + endpoint integration incl. BRP no-address and
DUO not-found fallbacks and 422 submit paths.
Frontend (only infrastructure/ + contracts/ change, as the architecture promised):
- NSwag-generated typed client (api-client.ts), routed through Angular HttpClient
via a small fetch adapter so the ?scenario= interceptor still applies.
- GET adapters use resource({ loader: client.x }); submit commands call the client
and map ProblemDetails -> err. The hardcoded uren==0 / manual-diploma rules are
deleted (now server-side). Domain, stores, UI and format validators unchanged.
- Deleted the now-dead public/mock/*.json.
Tooling/docs:
- npm start proxies /api -> backend; npm run gen:api regenerates the client;
docker compose up runs both (bind mounts use :z for SELinux/Fedora).
- backend/README.md walkthrough: adding a policy question is a one-file backend
change, no FE change, no client regen. Updated CLAUDE.md + ARCHITECTURE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>