feat(zgw): docker OpenZaak integration-test harness (WP-54)

Opt-in docker-compose (postgres+redis+OpenZaak, no celery/nginx) +
bootstrap-catalogus.sh seed a real OpenZaak instance; OpenZaakIntegrationTests
(Category=Integration, excluded from default dotnet test/CI) proves the ZGW
seam against it for the first time. That live run caught a real bug:
ZgwHttpClient never sent Content-Crs/Accept-Crs headers, so every write would
412 against a spec-compliant OpenZaak — fixed alongside the harness.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/project/backlog/README.md

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ for its existing violations, so every WP ends green.
 | [WP-51](WP-51-openzaak-documenten.md)                  | OpenZaak Documenten (DRC) upload + zaak link                                       | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
 | [WP-52](WP-52-openzaak-notificaties.md)                | OpenZaak Notificaties (NRC) live status via webhook                                | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
 | [WP-53](WP-53-inbound-identity-and-citizen-scoping.md) | Inbound identity seam + citizen-scoping (per-request BSN, ZGW audit claims)        | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
-| [WP-54](WP-54-openzaak-integration-harness.md)         | Docker OpenZaak integration-test harness (opt-in, live round-trip)                 | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | todo   |
+| [WP-54](WP-54-openzaak-integration-harness.md)         | Docker OpenZaak integration-test harness (opt-in, live round-trip)                 | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
 
 Sequencing dependencies (stated in the WPs too): 01 before 10–15 (axe covers story churn);
 03/04 before 05–09 (boundaries stop new violations during refactors); 06 before 07 (typed

docs/project/backlog/WP-54-openzaak-integration-harness.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # WP-54 — Docker OpenZaak integration-test harness
 
-Status: todo
+Status: done
 Phase: 9 — OpenZaak / ZGW integration
 
 ## Why
@@ -87,17 +87,19 @@ OpenZaak facts that shape the harness (from the ZGW research):
 
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
-- [ ] `docker compose -f backend/openzaak/docker-compose.openzaak.yml up` yields a reachable
+- [x] `docker compose -f backend/openzaak/docker-compose.openzaak.yml up` yields a reachable
       OpenZaak with the seeded catalogus + zaak, and credentials matching `ZgwOptions`.
-- [ ] The Category=Integration test passes against it; the BFF returns the seeded zaak mapped to
+- [x] The Category=Integration test passes against it; the BFF returns the seeded zaak mapped to
       `ApplicationSummaryDto` through the real HTTP + JWT path.
-- [ ] Default `dotnet test` and `npm run ci` are unaffected (integration test excluded, no docker
+- [x] Default `dotnet test` and `npm run ci` are unaffected (integration test excluded, no docker
       needed); `docker compose up` (root) is unchanged.
 
 ## Verification
 
 `docker compose -f backend/openzaak/docker-compose.openzaak.yml up -d` →
-`dotnet test --filter Category=Integration` → green; then teardown.
+`./backend/openzaak/bootstrap-catalogus.sh` → `dotnet test --filter Category=Integration` →
+green; then teardown. Actually run (not just planned) during this WP — see Deviations below
+for what that surfaced.
 
 ## Out of scope
 
@@ -112,3 +114,32 @@ always-on CI job (keep it opt-in/manual — OpenZaak startup is slow), performan
   keep the fixture in the repo.
 - Bootstrap client scopes must include `catalogi.lezen` or zaaktype resolution 403s — cover in
   the setup script.
+
+## Deviations from the original plan
+
+- **`heeft_alle_autorisaties: true` instead of granular scopes.** The plan called out
+  `zaken.lezen`/`catalogi.lezen` specifically; in practice OpenZaak's scripted config
+  (`vng_api_common_applicaties_config`, upstream's own documented `setup_configuration` YAML
+  mechanism) exposes an all-scopes flag on the one `Applicatie` this harness ever creates. Since
+  that application exists for nothing but this throwaway test instance, granular scopes would
+  add YAML-schema risk for no real least-privilege benefit — took the simpler, equally-scripted
+  option.
+- **A live run found a real production bug, not just a harness wrinkle**: `ZgwHttpClient.cs`
+  never sent `Content-Crs`/`Accept-Crs` on any ZGW call. Every ZGW write 412s ("Content-Crs
+  header ontbreekt") without it — a real OpenZaak enforces this; the stub `HttpMessageHandler`
+  every prior Zgw test used never modelled header requirements, so nothing from WP-49/50 caught
+  it before now. Fixed in `ZgwHttpClient.cs` alongside the harness (see
+  `docs/reference/openzaak-integration.md`) — this is precisely the class of bug this WP exists
+  to catch.
+- **Publishing a zaaktype needs more seed data than the plan anticipated**: OpenZaak refuses to
+  publish a zaaktype with fewer than one resultaattype or fewer than two statustypen (begin +
+  eind), and a resultaattype's `selectielijstklasse` must share a `procesType` with the
+  zaaktype's own `selectielijstProcestype` — both cross-checked live against the public VNG
+  selectielijst API (`selectielijst.openzaak.nl`). `bootstrap-catalogus.sh` seeds all of this;
+  see its comments for the exact values used and why.
+- **No celery/celery-beat/nginx in the harness**, unlike upstream's own compose — trimmed for a
+  faster-booting, single-purpose harness (this test never asserts on notification delivery,
+  which is celery's job). `NOTIFICATIONS_DISABLED=true` is required as a consequence: without a
+  celery worker, `NotificationsConfig` has no client, and OpenZaak's `notify()` hook otherwise
+  raises inside the same DB transaction as the create — turning a missing-worker problem into a
+  500 that rolls back the create it was supposed to just notify about.